YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
ability  artistry  better  control  create  defenders  dribbles  dribbling  effective  football  messi's  ronaldo  ronaldo's  success  successful  
LATEST POSTS

Who is better at dribbling, Messi or CR7?

Who is better at dribbling, Messi or CR7?

The fundamentals: What makes a great dribbler?

Dribbling isn't just about running with the ball—it's about control, balance, agility, vision, and unpredictability. Great dribblers can change direction in a split second, shield the ball under pressure, and create space where none exists. Messi and Ronaldo both possess elite dribbling skills, but their approaches differ dramatically.

Messi: The maestro of close control

Lionel Messi's dribbling is often described as magical. His low center of gravity, lightning-quick feet, and ability to shift the ball from one foot to the other in milliseconds make him nearly impossible to dispossess. Messi doesn't just dribble to beat players—he dribbles to manipulate space, drag defenders out of position, and create openings for teammates.

His signature moves include the body feint, the La Croqueta (a quick lateral shuffle of the ball), and the ability to glide past multiple defenders in tight spaces. Messi's dribbling feels spontaneous, almost improvised, as if he's composing a melody in real time.

Ronaldo: Power, pace, and precision

Cristiano Ronaldo's dribbling is built on raw athleticism. His explosive acceleration, upper body strength, and long stride allow him to bulldoze through defenses or sprint past them with ease. Ronaldo's style is more direct—he uses his speed to create separation, then relies on his physicality to protect the ball.

His go-to moves include the step-over, the chop, and the sudden burst of pace that leaves defenders flat-footed. While not as intricate as Messi's, Ronaldo's dribbling is brutally effective, especially in transition and counter-attacks.

Statistical comparison: Numbers don't lie

Stats provide a clearer picture of their dribbling effectiveness. According to Opta and other football analytics platforms:

  • Messi averages 4.9 successful dribbles per 90 minutes in La Liga and Ligue 1.
  • Ronaldo averages 2.1 successful dribbles per 90 minutes in the Premier League, La Liga, and Serie A.
  • Messi's dribble success rate hovers around 65-70%, while Ronaldo's is closer to 55-60%.
  • In one-on-one situations, Messi completes 8.2 take-ons per 90 minutes versus Ronaldo's 3.8.

These numbers show Messi not only attempts more dribbles but succeeds at a higher rate. Ronaldo's lower volume reflects his team role—he often operates in the final third, where space is tighter and defenders are more compact.

Key moments that define their dribbling legacies

Messi's dribbling brilliance is immortalized in moments like his 2007 El Clásico goal against Real Madrid, where he dribbled past five defenders from the halfway line. Or his 2015 UEFA Champions League semifinal second leg against Bayern Munich, where he left Jerome Boateng on the ground before chipping Manuel Neuer.

Ronaldo's iconic dribbles include his 2007 FA Cup goal against Arsenal, where he beat three defenders before finishing, and his 2018 Champions League bicycle kick against Juventus, which showcased his aerial control and confidence in one-on-one duels.

Context matters: Role, era, and team tactics

It's unfair to judge their dribbling in isolation. Messi spent most of his career as a false nine or playmaker, drifting into pockets of space and dictating play. This role naturally involves more dribbling as he drops deep to receive the ball and initiates attacks.

Ronaldo, especially in his later years, evolved into a penalty-box poacher. His dribbling decreased as he focused on finishing chances rather than creating them. In his early Manchester United days, however, Ronaldo was a winger who relied heavily on dribbling to beat full-backs and deliver crosses.

The evolution of their styles

Messi's dribbling has remained remarkably consistent throughout his career. Even at 36, he maintains elite close control, though he now conserves energy by picking his moments more carefully.

Ronaldo's dribbling peaked in his mid-20s. As he aged, he sacrificed some flair for efficiency, focusing on positioning and finishing. His step-overs became less frequent, replaced by smarter movement and clinical finishing.

Expert opinions and player testimonies

Former players and coaches consistently rank Messi higher in dribbling artistry. Pep Guardiola once said, "Messi is the only player who can change the tempo of the game with the ball at his feet." Johan Cruyff called him "a PlayStation player" for his ability to execute impossible moves.

Ronaldo's peers admire his physicality and determination. Rio Ferdinand described him as "a machine" whose dribbling was powered by relentless work ethic. Gary Neville noted that Ronaldo's dribbling was "designed to hurt you," while Messi's was "designed to entertain you."

What defenders say

Defenders who faced both players often highlight the different challenges they posed. Philipp Lahm, who marked both, said Messi was harder to defend because "you never know what he'll do next." Sergio Ramos, despite being a rival, admitted Messi's dribbling made him "feel powerless."

Defenders found Ronaldo more predictable but equally dangerous due to his speed and strength. "With Ronaldo, you know he'll try to go past you, but stopping him is another story," said former Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic.

Who is better at dribbling, Messi or CR7?

If we define dribbling purely as the ability to beat defenders with the ball, Messi is the superior dribbler. His creativity, close control, and success rate are unmatched. Ronaldo's dribbling, while effective, is more about power and pace than finesse.

But football isn't just about artistry. Ronaldo's dribbling served his team's needs perfectly—he used it to create chances, draw fouls, and score goals. Messi's dribbling often created magic, but sometimes at the cost of team structure.

So the answer depends on what you value: Messi for pure dribbling mastery, Ronaldo for effective, goal-oriented dribbling. Personally, I lean toward Messi—his ability to dribble in tight spaces, under pressure, and with such consistency is unparalleled in modern football.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who has more successful dribbles in their career?

Lionel Messi has significantly more successful dribbles than Cristiano Ronaldo. Across all competitions, Messi has completed over 2,000 successful dribbles, while Ronaldo has around 800-900. Messi's higher volume and success rate reflect his role as a playmaker and his superior close control.

Did Ronaldo ever have better dribbling than Messi?

In his early Manchester United days (2003-2009), Ronaldo's dribbling was spectacular, especially as a winger. He frequently beat defenders with step-overs and sudden bursts of pace. However, even then, Messi's dribbling was more refined and effective. Ronaldo's peak dribbling years were impressive but not quite at Messi's level of consistency and creativity.

How do their dribbling styles differ?

Messi's dribbling is about close control, quick changes of direction, and improvisation. He uses his low center of gravity to glide past defenders in tight spaces. Ronaldo's dribbling relies on explosive speed, strength, and direct running. He beats defenders with pace and power rather than intricate footwork.

Which player is more effective in one-on-one situations?

Messi is more effective in one-on-one situations, with a higher success rate and more attempts per game. His ability to change direction instantly and protect the ball makes him extremely difficult to dispossess. Ronaldo is effective too, but his one-on-one success rate is lower, and he often chooses to pass or shoot rather than take on defenders.

The bottom line

When comparing Messi and Ronaldo's dribbling, the evidence overwhelmingly favors Messi. His creativity, consistency, and success rate are unmatched. Ronaldo's dribbling, while powerful and effective, doesn't reach the same artistic or statistical heights.

But this debate isn't just about numbers. It's about two different philosophies of play. Messi's dribbling is a form of expression, a way to create beauty on the pitch. Ronaldo's is a weapon, designed to win games and break records.

So who is better at dribbling? If you value artistry and consistency, Messi wins hands down. If you value power and directness, Ronaldo has his merits. But in the pantheon of great dribblers, Messi stands alone.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.