YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
actress  animation  enable  hermione  markdown  personal  potter  public  regarding  relationship  rowling  screen  shared  watson  watson's  
LATEST POSTS

What did JK Rowling say about Emma?

What did JK Rowling say about Emma?

The relationship between J.K. Rowling and Emma Watson—the author who created Hermione Granger and the actress who brought her to life on screen—presents one of the most intriguing cultural studies in modern literature and cinema. For over a decade, their public bond appeared ideal, rooted in mutual admiration and a shared connection to one of fiction's most beloved characters. However, as public commentary and personal convictions shifted over time, the narrative surrounding their relationship evolved significantly.

The Audition and Early Admiration

To understand what J.K. Rowling has said about Emma Watson, one must return to the initial casting of the Harry Potter film adaptation around the year 2000. Rowling held significant creative control over the casting process, maintaining a firm stance that the lead actors must be British to preserve the integrity and authentic spirit of her books.

When nine-year-old Emma Watson auditioned for the role of Hermione Granger, Rowling was captivated by her sharp intellect and confidence. However, Rowling later admitted to a subtle irony regarding Watson's initial casting: the actress was simply too pretty for the Hermione she had originally envisioned on the page. In the books, Hermione was described as having bushy brown hair, large front teeth, and a somewhat geeky demeanor.

In a well-documented 2014 interview with Wonderland magazine—guest-edited by Watson herself—Rowling reflected on meeting the young actress for the first time over the phone before seeing her on screen. Rowling remarked that after speaking to Watson, she realized the young girl was exceptionally bright and perfectly suited to capture Hermione's intellectual spirit. When she finally met Watson in person, Rowling jokingly admitted thinking that Watson was far more glamorous than the awkward book character, but Watson's fierce, screen-testing energy won her over completely.

The Character vs. The Actress

Throughout the decade of filming the eight Harry Potter movies, Rowling repeatedly expressed her deep respect for Watson's dedication to her education and her craft. In various behind-the-scenes interviews, featurettes, and literary panel discussions, Rowling praised Watson for embodying the core traits of Hermione: curiosity, fierce loyalty, and a commitment to academic excellence.

Rowling frequently noted that among the "Big Three" cast members—Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson—Watson mirrored her character's real-world counterpart most closely in terms of discipline. While Grint shared Ron's laid-back humor and Radcliffe possessed Harry's quiet resilience, Watson shared Hermione's intense drive and passion for learning.

During the release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Rowling famously spoke about the "Big Seven"—a group comprising the main trio alongside Evanna Lynch, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton, and Matthew Lewis—stating that their performances influenced how she wrote the final books to a degree, even if unconsciously. Regarding Watson specifically, Rowling noted that Watson's portrayal brought a warmth and emotional depth that enriched the audience's understanding of Hermione's internal struggles.

The Regret Over Hermione's Ending

Perhaps the most famous—and widely debated—statement Rowling ever made regarding Hermione (and by extension Watson's portrayal) occurred during the aforementioned 2014 Wonderland conversation.

Rowling admitted to Watson that, in hindsight, matching Hermione with Ron Weasley was a choice driven by personal fulfillment rather than narrative logic. She stated that for reasons that had little to do with literature and much more to do with clinging to the plot as she first imagined it, Hermione ended up with Ron. Rowling acknowledged that some fans wondered if Ron could have truly made her happy, suggesting that Harry and Hermione might have been a better fit.

Watson agreed with Rowling's assessment during the interview, noting that fans also questioned whether Ron could realistically make Hermione happy in the long run. This admission caused a massive ripple across the Harry Potter fandom worldwide, reigniting debates about character dynamics that persist to this day.

Shifting Dynamics and Public Stances

In more recent years, public discussions surrounding Rowling and Watson have taken a noticeable turn. As Rowling began publicly expressing her views on gender identity and sex-based rights starting around 2019 and 2020, several cast members, including Watson, publicly shared their own stances on these issues.

In June 2020, Watson posted statements on social media reiterating her support for the transgender community. While Watson did not directly name Rowling in her posts, media outlets and commentators widely framed these statements as a direct response to Rowling's published essays and tweets.

Following these events, media scrutiny regarding Rowling's opinion of Watson—and vice versa—intensified dramatically. Fans and commentators began dissecting every past statement, social media post, and interview to evaluate the current state of their relationship.

Analyzing the Public Record

When evaluating what Rowling has said about Watson in recent years, it is essential to distinguish between verified quotes, media interpretations, and online commentary.

Honestly, it's unclear to what extent their personal, off-screen contact exists today. While some media commentators suggest that the professional relationship has permanently cooled due to starkly differing socio-political views, experts disagree on whether public statements fully reflect their private interactions or mutual respect for the work they accomplished together over a decade.

Rowling has generally refrained from issuing harsh personal attacks against the young actors she helped elevate to global stardom. Instead, her commentary regarding the original cast members often focuses on the distinction between the children she knew on set and the independent adults they have become, each with their own worldviews and autonomy.

(End of Part 1)

It looks like your prompt might have gotten a bit scrambled or garbled! Could you please clarify what topic or question you would like help with?

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.