YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
distance  football  goalkeeper  goalkeepers  happens  inside  keeper  launch  meters  opposing  penalty  possible  scoring  throwing  throws  
LATEST POSTS

Can a Goalkeeper Throw the Ball Into the Goal?

Let’s be clear about this: goalkeepers aren’t supposed to score. Their job description involves stopping goals, not creating them. But the Laws of the Game don’t care about job descriptions. They care about boundaries, timing, and procedures. And nowhere in Law 10 (The Method of Scoring) or Law 12 (Fouls and Misconduct) does it say a goalkeeper can’t launch the ball like a quarterback and watch it sail 80 meters into the net. That changes everything—at least in theory.

Understanding the Rules: What the Laws Actually Say About Goalkeeper Goals

The question “Can a goalkeeper throw the ball into the goal?” assumes a rulebook limitation where there isn’t one. According to Law 9 (The Ball In and Out of Play), the ball remains in play from the moment it crosses the goal line—provided no infringement occurs—regardless of who touched it last. And Law 12 explicitly permits goalkeepers to handle the ball within their own penalty area. That includes picking it up, catching it, and, yes, throwing it. There’s no clause banning long-range throws from resulting in goals. So if a keeper hurls the ball from his six-yard box and it flies over the halfway line, bounces once, evades the opposing goalkeeper, and rolls in? Goal counts. Full stop.

And that’s exactly where people get tripped up. They assume scoring from a throw is prohibited because it feels wrong. Unfair, almost. Like a chess player moving a pawn backward. But football isn’t chess. It’s messy. Human. Occasionally ridiculous. The rules are designed to be minimal, not predictive of every absurd outcome. Which explains why a goalkeeper scoring directly from a throw isn’t illegal—it’s just improbable to the point of near-fiction.

Still, there’s a catch. The goalkeeper must not violate other rules while attempting it. For example, if he throws the ball while still holding it outside the penalty area—say, stepping over the line mid-throw—that’s an indirect free kick to the opposition. Or if he throws it at an opponent’s head on purpose, that’s violent conduct. But clean execution? No whistles. No cards. Just silence, then stunned realization.

Direct Throws From Inside the Penalty Area

A goalkeeper is fully entitled to release the ball from any part of his own penalty area—hands, feet, even a dramatic overhead toss if he feels like it. The key is control: once he’s released it into play, he can’t touch it again until another player has. But during that initial release, throwing is completely legal. The Laws don’t distinguish between throwing, rolling, or kicking as methods of restarting play. So if the throw travels 75 meters and scores? It’s a valid goal.

What Happens if the Keeper Throws From Outside the Box?

That’s a different story. If the goalkeeper handles the ball outside his penalty area—say, chasing a long through ball beyond the 18-yard line—any subsequent throw or touch is a handball offense. Direct free kick. Possibly a yellow card if it’s deemed to deny an obvious goal-scoring opportunity. So distance isn’t the problem. Geography is. The line matters more than arm strength.

Why It Almost Never Happens: The Practical Barriers to a Goalkeeper Goal by Throw

Let’s face it: human arms aren’t built for 80-meter precision throws. Quarterbacks in the NFL max out at around 70 yards with spiral passes, and they’re trained athletes in peak condition, launching aerodynamic footballs. Soccer balls? Round, bouncy, and built for feet, not fingers. The average goalkeeper can throw roughly 35 to 45 meters—maybe 50 on a perfect day with tailwind and divine intervention. That gets the ball near the halfway line, sure, but not close enough to threaten the net.

And even if physics were on their side, timing isn’t. Imagine a goalkeeper deciding to launch it: he’d need a moment of complete defensive security, no pressure from strikers, and an opposing keeper caught way off his line. Those moments exist—like Alisson Becker’s 95th-minute header for Liverpool in 2021—but they’re fleeting. Usually, if the opposing keeper is that far out, it’s because a forward is already charging toward an open net. Risk versus reward? The risk of missing and leaving your own goal exposed is astronomical.

Plus, there’s the social contract. Goalkeepers aren’t expected to be scorers. If one does try this and fails? Mockery follows. Memes. Pundits calling it “a moment of madness.” There’s institutional pressure against it. Coaches don’t train for it. Broadcasters treat it as a freak show, not strategy. So while the rules allow it, the culture discourages it. And that’s a powerful deterrent.

The Aerodynamics of a Soccer Ball vs. a Football

A regulation soccer ball weighs about 410–450 grams and has a circumference of 68–70 cm. Thrown through the air, it creates massive drag. Unlike the pointed shape of an American football, which cuts through the wind, a spherical ball slows down fast. After 40 meters, its speed drops by more than half. By 60, it’s descending rapidly. To reach the opposite goal from a throw, you’d need a launch speed exceeding 30 m/s—something no human goalkeeper has recorded.

Psychological and Tactical Constraints

Because football is as much about timing as talent. You can’t just decide to throw it 80 meters because the mood strikes you. The game has rhythms. Pressures. A goalkeeper trying this in a tight 1–1 match at Anfield? His manager would bench him next week. But in a 5–0 loss with five minutes left? Maybe. Still, the opportunity is vanishingly small. It’s a bit like trying to catch a bullet with your teeth—not impossible, just utterly unreasonable.

Famous Attempts and Near-Misses: When Keepers Came Close

There are no confirmed instances of a goalkeeper scoring directly from a throw in professional football. None in FIFA competitions, none in the top five European leagues. But there have been moments—fleeting, glorious—that suggest it’s not pure fantasy.

In 2006, Asmir Begović, then at Portsmouth, launched a goal kick that bounced and flew into the net against Southampton. That was a kick, not a throw, but it proved distance is possible. His throw? Probably maxed out around 48 meters. Still, it raised eyebrows. Then there’s René Higuita, the Colombian maverick who scored from open play in 1995—and once attempted a 70-meter dribble. Would he have tried a throw-in goal? Without hesitation. But data is still lacking.

Lower leagues tell different stories. In 2019, a semi-pro goalkeeper in Romania allegedly scored from a throw during a regional match, but video evidence is shaky. Officials disputed it. Was it a throw? Or did he punt it? Honestly, it is unclear. But the rumor persists. And that’s telling: we want it to be possible. We need it to be possible. Football thrives on the improbable.

Throws vs. Kicks: Which Gives a Keeper a Better Shot at Scoring?

Let’s cut through the noise: if a goalkeeper wants to score, he should kick, not throw. A drop punt or goal kick can travel 70+ meters. Throwing? 50 max. Even under ideal conditions—a dry ball, no wind, perfect technique—a throw loses energy faster. Which explains why every legitimate keeper goal in history (Begović, José Luis Chilavert, Rogério Ceni) came from a kick or a penalty, never a throw.

But—and this is a fun but—throws offer more control in short bursts. A quick release to a fullback? Yes. A surprise long ball catching an offside line napping? Absolutely. But for pure distance and scoring potential? Kicks win. Always. So if you’re asking whether a throw can result in a goal, the answer is yes. But if you’re asking whether it’s the best method? We’re far from it.

Goal Kicks: The Real Scoring Tool for Keepers

Modern analytics show that elite keepers can launch goal kicks between 60 and 75 meters. That puts the ball in or near the opposition’s penalty area. One bounce, a deflection, a misjudgment—that’s how goals happen. Throwing simply can’t match that range.

Throwing for Distribution, Not Scoring

And yet, throws have their place. In youth football, you’ll see keepers using long throws as tactical weapons—hitting tall forwards near the edge of the box. The “long throw-in” tactic, popularized by Rory Delap at Stoke City, created dozens of chances. But that’s from the touchline, not the hands inside the area. Inside the box, throwing is for speed, not distance. It’s a tool for transition, not glory.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a goalkeeper score from a throw-in during the game?

No—because goalkeepers don’t take throw-ins. That’s a different rule. Only outfield players can take throw-ins. So if a keeper tries to, it’s an incorrect restart. But during active play, when he’s in possession inside his box, he can throw the ball forward legally. The confusion comes from mixing throw-ins with open-play throws.

Has any goalkeeper ever scored from a throw?

There are no verified cases in professional football. All confirmed keeper goals have come from kicks, penalties, or headers from set pieces. Throwing? Still a myth. A beautiful, enduring myth.

What happens if the ball hits the referee and goes in after a goalkeeper’s throw?

It still counts—as long as the throw was legal. The referee is part of the field. If the ball deflects off him and into the net, it’s a valid goal. No redos. No do-overs. That’s football.

The Bottom Line

Yes, a goalkeeper can throw the ball into the goal. The Laws allow it. The physics barely permit it. The game has never seen it. That’s the paradox. It’s legal, possible, and utterly impractical. I find this overrated as a tactical option—but fascinating as a cultural test. Would fans celebrate it? Or would they laugh? That says more about football than any rule ever could.

Here’s my personal recommendation: if you’re a young goalkeeper dreaming of glory, work on your long kicks, not your javelin throw. The odds are better. The recognition, too. But keep the dream alive. Because football’s beauty isn’t just in what happens—it’s in what could. Even if it never does.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.