YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
choose  cristiano  different  entirely  football  footballing  french  frenchman  madrid  manager  player  ronaldo  tactical  ultimate  zidane  
LATEST POSTS

The Elusive Verdict: Who Did Zidane Choose, Messi or Ronaldo, When Pundits Demanded an Answer?

The Elusive Verdict: Who Did Zidane Choose, Messi or Ronaldo, When Pundits Demanded an Answer?

Deconstructing the Santiago Bernabéu Diplomacy: The Context Behind the Choice

To truly understand why the question of who did Zidane choose, Messi or Ronaldo, became such a massive talking point, we have to travel back to the late 2010s. It was a time when the football world was gripped by a tribal warfare of statistics, and the manager’s seat at Chamartín was the hottest in Europe. Zidane, stepping into the dugout in January 2016, found himself managing an ego-heavy dressing room that required a masterclass in psychological alignment. Ronaldo was the crown jewel, a goal-scoring cyborg whose insatiable appetite for individual accolades powered the team’s collective success.

The Real Madrid Dressing Room Dynamics

Imagine managing a player who treats every missed chance like a personal tragedy; that was the reality of handling CR7 during Madrid's historic run to three consecutive Champions League titles. Zidane knew this, which explains why his public statements were often calculated to boost his talisman's confidence. When the media asked him to choose between his number seven and the diminutive magician of Barcelona, the Frenchman chose loyalty. He boldly stated that Cristiano was the best, a move that secured absolute devotion from his star player before they conquered the 2017 Champions League final in Cardiff.

The Weight of the Ballon d'Or Era

People don't think about this enough, but the sheer gravity of the individual awards race forced everyone—managers included—to pick a side. During that specific window, Ronaldo and Messi were trading the golden ball like a casual game of catch. Zidane, having won the award in 1998 himself, possessed a rare peer-to-peer understanding of that immense pressure. His public backing wasn't just tactical PR; it was a protective shield thrown over a player whose legacy was being forged in real-time against a relentless Argentinian counterpart.

The Technical Blueprint: Analyzing Ronaldo Through the Eyes of Zizou

What did the French maestro actually see when he watched Cristiano on the pitch every single weekend? It wasn't just the raw numbers—though the 450 goals in 438 appearances for Los Blancos are frankly ridiculous—but rather an unmatched aerial dominance and a clutch gene that manifested when the stakes were highest. Zidane’s own game was built on elegance and spatial awareness, whereas Ronaldo brought a furious, athletic pragmatism to the pitch. The contrast between manager and player was stark, yet the mutual respect was total.

The Evolution from Winger to Lethal Number Nine

Where it gets tricky is tracking how Zidane actually deployed Ronaldo to maximize his output against low-block defenses. The Portuguese international started out wide, tormenting full-backs with stepovers, but under Zizou’s stewardship, he morphed into the ultimate penalty-box predator. This tactical shift allowed Madrid to sustain attacks while utilizing crossing triangles involving Marcelo and Toni Kroos. It was a lethal formula, culminating in the destruction of Juventus in Cardiff, where Ronaldo scored twice by exploiting tiny defensive gaps that normal strikers wouldn't even notice.

The Big-Match Temperament as a Deciding Factor

But the thing is, Zidane valued the ability to decide a semi-final in the dying seconds above absolute aesthetic perfection. Ronaldo possessed that terrifying ability to look a crisis in the eye and simply overpower it, a trait vividly demonstrated against Atletico Madrid and Bayern Munich in April 2017. He didn't need to touch the ball eighty times a game to destroy an opponent. Two touches, two goals, tie over. For a manager who lived through the high-pressure nights of a World Cup final, that specific brand of efficiency was worth more than gold.

The Hidden Admiration: What Zidane Really Thought of Lionel Messi

Except that you cannot talk about a genius without acknowledging his mirror image, and Zidane’s relationship with Messi’s game was far more complex than a simple rejection. The Frenchman has never been blind to the pure, unadulterated street football that Messi brought to the pitch for Barcelona. In fact, years after leaving the Madrid dugout, during a promotional sit-down in November 2023, the two legends shared a moment of profound mutual appreciation that shifted the narrative entirely.

The Magic of the Untouchable Number Ten

During that specific encounter, the French legend admitted that it was a pity they never got to play together, describing Messi with a word he rarely uses: magic. He spoke of the Argentinian's ability to see things three seconds before anyone else on the pitch, a quality that Zidane himself famously possessed during his playing days at Juventus and Real Madrid. It was an admission that cut through years of El Clásico rivalry, showing that while Ronaldo was the choice for his system, Messi was the player who triggered his deepest footballing nostalgia.

The Conceptual Split: System Player vs. Pure Anarchy

So, who did Zidane choose, Messi or Ronaldo, when we strip away the club politics and look at the actual philosophy of football? The issue remains that we are trying to compare two entirely different sporting manifestations—one representing the pinnacle of athletic optimization and the other representing pure, natural anarchy. Experts disagree on which approach is superior, and honestly, it's unclear if a definitive answer even exists outside of personal preference. Zidane's ultimate choice was Ronaldo for the results, but his heart clearly beat for the kind of football Messi played.

The Construct of the Ultimate Athlete

Ronaldo is a machine built in a laboratory of self-discipline, a player who conquered Europe through sheer force of will and an absurd training regimen. He fits perfectly into a structured system that creates space for his lethal finishing. Zidane, a man who valued precision and physical dominance, saw in Cristiano the perfect weapon to execute a direct, transition-heavy style of football that dominated the Champions League. We're far from the days of romantic, slow-paced football; Ronaldo was the future, wrapped in a muscle-bound package.

Common misconceptions regarding the French tactician's preference

The myth of absolute Real Madrid bias

We often assume that loyalty dictates every single word uttered by footballing royalty. Because Zinedine Zidane managed Cristiano Ronaldo through a golden era of three consecutive Champions League trophies, a narrative emerged that the Frenchman was entirely blind to Lionel Messi’s genius. This is a complete fabrication. Footballing debates are rarely that black and white. Let's be clear: working daily with a Portuguese machine who scored 450 goals in 438 games for Los Blancos naturally forces a manager to champion his talisman publicly. Yet, tactical appreciation operates independently of club employment contracts. When you look closely at the actual transcripts, the French manager never locked himself into a narrow, biased prison. He recognized the astronomical reality of both icons.

Misinterpreting the soundbites for media bait

The problem is that the modern media environment thrives on polarization. Every time the Frenchman praised his star winger's unique training work ethic, headline writers transformed it into an absolute rejection of the Argentine wizard. Except that it wasn't. Headlines conveniently stripped away the nuanced context of pre-match press conferences where managers must protect team morale. Did you really expect a Madrid manager to declare the Barcelona number ten as the greatest right before a crucial El Clasico fixture? Hardly. The issue remains that observers conflate political diplomacy with genuine tactical assessment, creating a fabricated rivalry between the coach's loyalty and his objective footballing eye.

The timeline confusion

Another major blunder fans make is treating opinions as static monuments. Opinions evolve. Statements made in January 2016 during his initial managerial appointment carried a distinctly different weight compared to reflections shared after his second departure from the Bernabeu dugout. As a result: observers mix quotes from different eras to construct a false narrative of contradiction, failing to realize a manager's perspective shifts depending on whether he is actively coaching an athlete or observing the sport from a relaxed, neutral retirement penthouse.

The tactical nuance: Why systemic fit dictates his praise

The transition mechanics versus low-block manipulation

When analyzing who did Zidane choose, Messi or Ronaldo, we must look through the specific lens of elite tactical execution. The Frenchman’s Madrid side mastered the art of vertical transitions and crossing overloads. For this specific blueprint, the Portuguese forward was the ultimate lethal weapon, registering an absurd 0.93 goals per game under the manager's tenure. But consider the alternative reality. The Argentine maestro offers an entirely different tactical chessboard solution, specializing in deep progressive carries and half-space manipulation. A little-known aspect of this debate is how the coach adapted his defensive blocks specifically to stifle the little magician's creative passing lanes, which explains why his public admiration for the playmaker often focused on the sheer impossibility of stealing the ball from his left foot. (Even elite defenders like Sergio Ramos confessed to feeling completely helpless during those tactical breakdowns). He saw one as the ultimate finisher of his system, and the other as the ultimate disruptor of it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the French coach ever explicitly state that Cristiano Ronaldo was better than Lionel Messi?

Yes, during the height of their shared success in Spain, the manager explicitly stated that the Portuguese star was the greatest of all time. This declaration was backed by staggering individual returns, including the forward winning 2 Ballon d'Or awards under the Frenchman's direct guidance between 2016 and 2017. He frequently emphasized that his player's ability to score consistently in high-stakes knockout matches made him entirely unique in football history. However, seasoned analysts viewed these declarations as vital squad management rather than an objective, permanent footballing judgment. It was the necessary fuel to keep an ultra-competitive goalscorer happy and firing on all cylinders.

How did the manager react when Lionel Messi won the World Cup in 2022?

While the former Madrid boss maintained his characteristic public reserve, his historical comments regarding international excellence paint a very clear picture of immense respect. Having won the tournament himself in 1998 by scoring twice in the final, the Frenchman possesses a profound, firsthand understanding of the immense psychological pressure involved in carrying a nation to global glory. He has previously noted that achieving international immortality elevates a player into a completely different stratosphere of sporting history. Witnessing the Argentine captain secure that elusive trophy at the age of 35 merely solidified the perspective that comparing these two titans requires acknowledging different types of footballing greatness.

Is it possible to find quotes where he openly praises the Barcelona legend?

Absolutely, because true footballing masters cannot help but admire sublime technical execution regardless of the jersey color. During various interviews detached from his managerial obligations at Real Madrid, the Frenchman openly marveled at the playmaker's ability to decide games entirely on his own. Who did Zidane choose, Messi or Ronaldo, when discussing pure aesthetic joy on the pitch? He frequently leaned toward the sheer magic of the South American's dribbling, describing his unique style as a magnificent spectacle for anyone who truly loves the sport. This proves that his allegiance was never a simplistic, dogmatic refusal to acknowledge the genius operating on the opposite side of the fierce Spanish divide.

A definitive verdict on a legendary debate

Let us stop pretending that an elite footballing mind must view this debate through the simplistic eyes of an internet troll. The French icon chose both, but he utilized them for entirely different intellectual arguments. For the brutal efficiency of winning elite trophies under immense pressure, he locked arms with the Portuguese machine. For the pure, unadulterated romance of creative footballing expression, he bowed to the Argentine magician. It is a spectacular cop-out to demand a single name from a man who mastered every single blade of grass himself. My conviction is firm: he viewed the forward as the ultimate extension of his own competitive will, while viewing the playmaker as the ultimate expression of the game's artistic soul. We are looking at a master who refused to let tribalism blind his appreciation of historic greatness.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.