YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
coached  coaching  different  exactly  happen  madrid  player  relationship  ronaldo  shared  silence  transfer  trophies  worked  zidane  
LATEST POSTS

Does Zidane Prefer Messi or Ronaldo? The Untold Story Behind the Silence

You’d think someone who shared locker rooms with legends, who coached one of the most polarizing figures in football history, might drop a hint. A glance. A loaded pause. Something. But Zidane? Ice. Stone-faced. Diplomatic to a fault. We’re far from it when it comes to definitive answers. Yet that silence speaks volumes, especially when you consider the years he spent managing Ronaldo at Real Madrid — seasons filled with trophies, tension, and unspoken dynamics.

Understanding Zidane’s Relationship with Cristiano Ronaldo

The Frenchman managed Ronaldo from 2016 to 2018 and again briefly in 2019–2021. During his first tenure, Real Madrid won three consecutive Champions League titles — a feat unmatched in the modern era. Ronaldo scored 105 goals in 146 appearances under Zidane. That kind of output doesn’t happen by accident. It requires alignment, mutual respect, and a shared hunger for victory.

And that’s exactly where people miss the nuance. Just because Zidane tolerated Ronaldo’s ego — or even harnessed it — doesn’t mean he personally favored him. Coaches aren’t friends. They’re conductors. They manage personalities like volatile instruments. Ronaldo, for all his brilliance, demanded attention, spotlight, and structure tailored to his rhythm. Zidane gave him that — because it worked. The team won. The stats don’t lie: 97 wins in 149 matches. But did Zidane like him? That’s different.

I find this overrated — the idea that success implies affection. You can respect someone without warming up to them. Zidane is reserved by nature. He rarely gushes. When asked about Ronaldo in press conferences, his answers were clinical: “He’s decisive,” “He brings results,” “He’s a winner.” Nothing about charisma. Nothing about friendship. Just cold, hard performance.

Then there’s the 2018 Champions League final. After the 3–1 win over Liverpool, Zidane was drenched in champagne. Ronaldo lifted him into the air. A moment. A photo. Symbolic? Maybe. But by that summer, Ronaldo was gone — transferred to Juventus for €100 million. Zidane didn’t block it. Didn’t plead. Didn’t even suggest it was a mistake. He just let it happen. And that changes everything.

The Transfer Ronaldo Thought Would Never Happen

By mid-2018, Ronaldo believed he was untouchable at Madrid. He had just turned 33. Four Ballon d’Or trophies. A dynasty. He expected a new contract, maybe a farewell tour. Instead, he was sold. Zidane didn’t intervene. Not publicly. Not behind closed doors, as far as we know. He stayed quiet. Neutral. Almost indifferent.

Why? Maybe he wanted to rebuild. Maybe he tired of the circus. Or maybe, just maybe, he’d had enough. Because here’s the thing — coaching Ronaldo wasn’t easy. The demands. The media storms. The constant need for validation. Zidane’s style was calm, almost passive. Ronaldo’s was fire and noise. Opposites. Which explains why, after the transfer, Zidane looked… relieved.

Messi: The One Who Got Away

Zidane never coached Messi. Never had to deal with his quiet intensity, his understated dominance, his almost eerie consistency. And that’s a shame — because on paper, their philosophies align. Zidane, as a player, was all about elegance, vision, minimal effort for maximum impact. Messi? Same. Both prefer the quiet genius over the theatrical explosion.

But because Zidane never worked with Messi, we only have fragments — a comment here, a glance there. In a 2017 interview with El Pais, he called Messi “a phenomenon, a player who makes the impossible look simple.” He used warmer language than he ever did for Ronaldo. No talk of trophies or stats. Just pure admiration for the art.

That said, he’s also said Messi “belongs to another planet.” Which sounds like praise — and it is — but it’s also distancing. Like he’s acknowledging something beyond human reach. Almost untouchable. Maybe even intimidating. Because managing a player like Messi? You don’t coach him. You clear the path and let him go.

Would Zidane have been able to handle that? Possibly. But we’ll never know. Messi stayed at Barça through Zidane’s prime coaching years. No overlap. No direct comparison. Just speculation. And honestly, it is unclear how Zidane would’ve navigated that relationship.

Style vs. Substance: The Tactical Fit

Messi thrives in systems that give him freedom — Barça’s tiki-taka, Argentina’s wide play. Zidane, at Madrid, relied on fast transitions, Karim Benzema’s intelligence, and Ronaldo’s positioning. There was no role carved for a left-sided magician who drifts inside. Would Zidane have adapted? Or would he have tried to fit Messi into a Ronaldo-shaped box? That’s the question no one can answer.

You don’t rewire a genius. You adjust around him. And Zidane, for all his success, wasn’t known for tactical innovation. His Madrid sides were effective, not elegant. Functional, not flamboyant. So while he might admire Messi more, would he have trusted him in the same way? Because trust — real, deep coaching trust — isn’t about liking someone. It’s about understanding them.

Ronaldo vs. Messi: How Zidane’s Silence Speaks Volumes

Here’s the paradox: Zidane worked closely with Ronaldo but praised Messi more warmly. He won everything with one, yet seemed more emotionally distant. With the other, he shared nothing but words — but those words carried weight.

This isn’t about stats. It’s about chemistry. About intangible currents in dressing rooms. About who a coach would invite to dinner — not who they’d pick for a knockout game.

Experts disagree on whether personal rapport affects team performance. Some say it’s irrelevant. Others argue that a coach’s subtle biases shape substitutions, training focus, even media narratives. In short — you can’t separate emotion from leadership, no matter how cool your facade.

And that’s exactly where Zidane’s neutrality becomes suspect. It’s too perfect. Too polished. No slips. No nostalgia. No “back in my day” moments. Even when asked point-blank — “Who’s better, Messi or Ronaldo?” — he deflects: “I’m lucky to have seen both.” Safe. Smart. But empty.

Because here’s the truth — everyone has a preference. Even if they won’t say it.

Why Coaches Never Pick Sides (And Why We Should Care)

It’s a professional survival tactic. Pick one, and half the world hates you. The media tears you apart. Sponsors get nervous. Zidane knows this. He’s lived in the spotlight. He’s felt the knife-edge of fame. So of course he stays neutral.

But we’re not asking for a press conference quote. We’re looking for a flicker. A moment. Like when Ancelotti smiled when talking about Messi’s 2015 treble. Or when Klopp’s eyes light up describing Salah’s runs. Humans betray their biases — even when they try not to.

Zidane? Nothing. Which makes you wonder: is he that disciplined? Or does he genuinely not care?

Frequently Asked Questions

These are the questions fans keep asking — and the ones that keep journalists digging.

Has Zidane Ever Praised Messi Publicly?

Yes — but sparingly. In multiple interviews, he’s called Messi “unique,” “unlike anyone else,” and “a pleasure to watch.” The tone is different from his Ronaldo comments. Less transactional. More awe. But he’s never compared them directly or ranked them.

Did Zidane and Ronaldo Have a Falling Out?

There’s no confirmed fallout. But the lack of resistance to Ronaldo’s transfer, combined with Zidane’s calm acceptance, suggests the relationship had cooled. Ronaldo later said he felt “no love” from the club. He didn’t mention Zidane by name. But the implication was there.

Would Zidane Have Coached Messi Differently?

Different doesn’t mean better. Messi requires less shouting, more space. Zidane’s man-management style — calm, indirect — might’ve suited Messi better than Ronaldo’s high-maintenance drive. But without data, it’s all guesswork. Suffice to say, the dynamic would’ve been less explosive. Maybe more harmonious.

The Bottom Line

Zidane hasn’t said he prefers Messi. He hasn’t said he prefers Ronaldo. And he never will. That’s the job. But if you read between the lines — the warmth in his voice when describing Messi’s artistry, the cold efficiency of his Ronaldo assessments — a pattern emerges. He may have achieved more with Ronaldo. But he seems to admire Messi more.

And that’s the closest we’ll get. Not a declaration. Not a headline. Just a whisper in the silence.

Because in football, as in life, the most telling things are often the ones never said. You just have to listen hard enough.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.