YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
dominance  european  italian  juventus  league  number  people  points  reached  reality  record  records  scored  season  stands  
LATEST POSTS

Did Juventus Really Score 102 Points in a Serie A Season?

The thing is, people don’t think about this enough: point totals can be misquoted, records misremembered, and legacy inflated by narrative. And that’s exactly where the 102 myth slips in. It’s a blend of admiration, selective memory, and the way records get passed around like campfire tales. That said, let’s untangle the real history—because the truth is almost as impressive as the myth.

The Myth and the Math: Where 102 Points Came From

Juventus did finish the 2013–14 Serie A season with a record-breaking 102 points. But—and this is where it gets tricky—this total is often cited without context. People forget that before the 1994–95 season, wins were worth only two points. But we’re far from it now. Since 1995, it’s been three points per win. So yes, 102 is possible. The math isn’t the problem. The issue remains how that number became synonymous with dominance—even perfection—when, ironically, it wasn’t even the highest total in their own modern era.

Juventus actually topped 102 the very next year. In 2014–15, they scored 102 again? No. They earned 102 in 2013–14. In 2014–15, they had 102 points? Again? Wait. No. They had 97. But in 2015–16, they hit 91. So 102 stands out. But only once. And even then, it wasn’t an invincible season like 2011–12, when they went unbeaten but only scored 84 points—because draws eat into tallies when you’re chasing records.

The 2013–14 campaign remains their highest point total in history, a season where they won 33 games, drew three, and lost just two. That’s a 86.8% win rate—insane by any metric. To give a sense of scale: if you played 10 seasons like that, you’d win the league nine times easily. But still, no other Italian team has topped 100. AC Milan’s 1950–51 side got 78 under a two-point system. Inter Milan hit 97 in 2006–07. Napoli reached 91 in 2017–18. So 102? It’s a landmark, even if it’s only been hit once, by one team, for one fleeting year.

Breaking Down the 2013–14 Season: How It Actually Happened

That season wasn’t just about points. It was about control. Juventus dropped points only six times—three draws, two losses, and… wait, no, only five games yielded less than three points. They lost to Roma and Atalanta. Roma beat them 1–0 in January—a match where Totti scored from the spot. Atalanta? That was a 2–1 loss in December, a blip no one saw coming. The draws? Fiorentina, Chievo, and Bologna—three games where the offense sputtered just enough.

Antonio Conte was manager, and his 3–5–2 formation had become a machine. Pirlo pulled strings from deep, Vidal stormed through midfield, Tevez and Llorente tore up defenses. Tevez scored 19 league goals. Llorente added 15. They were clinical. Efficient. But it wasn’t just attack—Juventus conceded only 23 goals all season. That’s 0.6 goals per game. For comparison, Atalanta in 2023–24 conceded 48. That changes everything when you're talking about consistency.

And yet, despite the dominance, the team wasn’t flashy. No galaxy of superstars. No endless highlight reels. It was systemic, almost mechanical. Which explains why some fans find it overrated. Where’s the flair? The drama? But I am convinced that this version of Juve was more terrifying than glamorous—because they didn’t need to dazzle. They just had to show up.

Why 102 Points Feels Bigger Than It Is

Let’s be clear about this: 102 sounds bigger than it plays out on paper. Because in England, Manchester City hit 100 in 2017–18. Liverpool got 99 in 2019–20. But Serie A is different. The league has 20 teams, 38 matches—same as the Premier League. But the depth? Historically thinner. The competition? Less financially stacked. So a dominant team can run away with it. In 2013–14, Juve finished 17 points ahead of Roma. That’s a canyon. In the Premier League, a 17-point lead is rare. In Italy, under Juve’s decade of control, it became routine.

But—and this is a big but—just because it’s repeatable doesn’t make it easy. You still have to do it. Night after night. Year after year. And they did. From 2011–12 to 2019–20, Juventus won nine straight titles. No other European giant has done that. Bayern? Close. Real Madrid? Not even close. That consistency is what makes the 102-point season a symbol, not just a stat.

Yet, experts disagree on whether that season was their best. Some point to 2011–12: unbeaten, 84 points, a statement after Calciopoli. Others argue 2014–15 was stronger—they lost fewer goals, had better balance. But the problem is, we measure greatness by trophies, not spreadsheets. And 102 points didn’t bring a Champions League. It didn’t silence critics. It just made the domestic haul look even more lopsided.

The Psychological Weight of a Big Number

Numbers stick. 102 is round. It crosses the century mark. It feels like a milestone. But in reality, 97 points with a trophy is the same as 102. The extra five don’t change the metal. So why do we care? Maybe because in sports, records are all we have when the games end. We cling to them. We quote them. We use them to argue, to rank, to feel something long after the final whistle.

And honestly, it is unclear whether future teams will ever threaten that total again. Financial fair play, squad rotation, fixture congestion—modern football makes sustained dominance harder. PSG hit 97 in 2015–16. Barcelona once got 100. But none have cracked 102 in a truly competitive league. Maybe that’s why the number lingers.

2013–14 vs. Other Dominant Seasons: How It Stacks Up

Let’s compare. Bayern Munich in 2012–13: 91 points, won the treble. Real Madrid in 2011–12: 100 points, a record in Spain. But they lost to Dortmund in the semis. Juventus in 2013–14: 102 points, but lost in the Champions League round of 16—to Borussia Dortmund. Again. That’s the irony. Domestically untouchable. Continentally frustrating.

The Italian side outpaced their rivals by raw dominance, but didn’t translate it beyond borders. Meanwhile, Celtic once got 106 points in Scotland—but in a 38-game season with 34 wins? Wait, no. The Scottish Premiership has 38 games, but only 12 teams. The gap in competition level is massive. So 106 there isn’t comparable to 102 in Italy. It’s a bit like comparing marathon times on flat terrain versus mountain trails.

Which explains why some statisticians argue that point totals only matter within context. A 102 in Serie A circa 2014 means more than 106 in Ligue 1, where PSG took 96 in 2015–16 and faced minimal resistance. But even then, France has improved. Lille won in 2020–21 with just 83 points—proof that parity can deflate tallies.

Domestic Dominance vs. European Failure: The Paradox

Juventus won the league, but their Champions League exit stung. They finished first, but were seen as underachievers. How does that happen? Because expectations warp reality. When you dominate at home, people assume you should conquer Europe. But it’s not that simple. Tactics, luck, injuries—all collide on the continental stage.

And because Juve kept winning domestically, the European drought became louder. By 2015, they reached the final. Then again in 2017. But never won. So the 102-point season? It became a footnote in a larger story of near-misses. A brilliant season, buried under “what ifs.”

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Juventus get 102 points in more than one season?

No. They reached 102 points only once—in 2013–14. In 2014–15, they finished with 97. In 2015–16, 91. No other season has crossed the 100-point threshold. Despite consistent dominance, injuries, rotation, and occasional slips kept them just below.

Has any other Italian team scored over 100 points?

No Italian team has ever reached 100 points in a Serie A season. Inter Milan came closest with 97 in 2006–07 under Roberto Mancini. Napoli hit 91 in 2017–18. The structural competitiveness of the league, plus stricter financial limits, makes such tallies nearly impossible now.

Why is 102 points so rare in football?

Because it requires near-perfection. You can lose only two games and draw three. Any more dropped points, and you’re below 100. Sustaining that level over 38 weeks—through injuries, fixture congestion, and psychological lows—is incredibly difficult. Even the best teams slip. That’s why only a handful of clubs in Europe have ever done it.

The Bottom Line: A Record That Stands Alone

Juventus did get 102 points—in 2013–14. It was real. It was historic. But it wasn’t magic. It was the product of a well-oiled system, smart recruitment, and a league that, for a decade, couldn’t match their depth. I find this overrated in terms of legacy—because it didn’t lead to European glory—but undeniable in statistical terms.

But here’s the kicker: records like this may never be broken in Italy. With financial regulations, squad rotation, and growing parity, the era of 100-point seasons might already be over. So while 102 stands as a peak, it might also be a relic. A number frozen in time. And that’s the quiet tragedy of dominance—once you reach the top, all that’s left is the wait for someone else to climb.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.