YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
_ngcontent  _nghost  c2123806936  c2732433176  c2886815909  carousel  citation  container  footnote  inline  inserted  placeholder  source  sources  version  
LATEST POSTS

Navigating the Architecture of IFRS 17: A Comprehensive Guide to Measurement Methods (Part I)

The implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards 17 (IFRS 17) Insurance Contracts marked a fundamental paradigm shift in insurance accounting globally. Replacing the legacy standard, IFRS 4—which largely permitted local accounting practices and historical cost models—IFRS 17 established a unified, market-consistent, and transparent framework for evaluating insurance obligations.

At the structural heart of IFRS 17 lies a dynamic balance-sheet philosophy: measuring liabilities at current economic value while deferring unearned profit to reflect services delivered over time. To capture the vastly different economic realities across life, non-life, health, and investment-linked products, IFRS 17 codifies three primary measurement approaches (or valuation models):

  1. The General Measurement Model (GMM), traditionally referred to as the Building Block Approach (BBA).

  2. The Variable Fee Approach (VFA), tailored specifically for direct participating contracts.

  3. The Premium Allocation Approach (PAA), a simplified model for short-duration business.

Understanding these methods requires examining the operational mechanics, cash-flow assumptions, discount rates, and profit-deferral systems that govern each approach.

1. Structural Foundations: Aggregation and Scope

Before choosing or executing a measurement method, an reporting entity must establish its foundational structure through aggregation. Under IFRS 17, accounting units are not individual contracts, nor are they entire lines of business. Instead, entities must follow a three-tier hierarchy to construct a Group of Contracts:

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Portfolio |
| (Contracts subject to similar risks & managed together) |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
 |
 v
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Annual Cohort |
| (Issued no more than 12 months apart) |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
 |
 v
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Profitability Buckets |
| 1. Onerous at initial recognition |
| 2. No significant risk of becoming onerous |
| 3. Remaining profitable contracts |
+-------------------------------------------------------+

Once contracts are appropriately grouped, the insurer must determine the applicable valuation model based on contract characteristics and legal boundaries.

2. Method 1: The General Measurement Model (GMM / BBA)

The General Measurement Model (GMM)—or Building Block Approach (BBA)—serves as the default baseline valuation framework for all insurance contracts under IFRS 17. Unless a contract specifically qualifies for the VFA or PAA, GMM must be applied. It applies heavily to long-tail protection products, non-participating term life insurance, traditional annuities, and long-term disability coverages.

The Four Core Building Blocks

The total insurance liability under the GMM consists of two main pillars: the Liability for Remaining Coverage (LRC)—representing future coverage periods—and the Liability for Incurred Claims (LIC)—representing claims already incurred but not yet settled. The total valuation is constructed using four distinct building blocks:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| IFRS 17 GMM Balance Sheet |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| [Block 1] Expected Future Cash Inflows & Outflows (Best Est.) |
| [Block 2] Discounting / Time Value of Money (Bottom-Up/Top-Down)|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| = Fulfillment Cash Flows (FCF) before Risk Adjustment |
| + [Block 3] Risk Adjustment for Non-Financial Risk (RA) |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| = Fulfillment Cash Flows (FCF) |
| + [Block 4] Contractual Service Margin (CSM) [If Profitable] |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| = Total Insurance Contract Liability |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+

Block 1: Probability-Weighted Estimates of Future Cash Flows

Insurers must project all explicit, unbiased, probability-weighted cash inflows and outflows within the contract boundary.

  • Cash Inflows: Premiums, policy fees, and recovery receivables.

  • Cash Outflows: Claims, benefits, directly attributable acquisition costs, and ongoing policy administration expenses.

  • Contract Boundary Rule: Cash flows fall within the boundary if the entity can compel the policyholder to pay premiums or if the entity has a substantive obligation to provide services. Once the insurer has the practical ability to reassess the risk profile and re-price the contract, future cash flows beyond that point are excluded.

Block 2: Time Value of Money and Financial Risk Adjustment

Because fulfillment cash flows occur across future years, they must be discounted using current market-consistent discount rates. IFRS 17 prohibits using historical locked-in book rates for liability measurement, requiring entities to construct an entity-specific yield curve using one of two methods:

  • Bottom-Up Approach: Starts with a liquid risk-free yield curve (e.g., swap rates or sovereign bond curves) and adds an illiquidity premium to reflect the liquidity characteristics of the insurance liabilities.

  • Top-Down Approach: Starts with the expected return on a reference asset portfolio held by the insurer and deducts market risk premiums (such as credit default risk and asset illiquidity mismatches) irrelevant to insurance obligations.

Block 3: Risk Adjustment for Non-Financial Risk (RA)

The Risk Adjustment (RA) measures the compensation the insurer requires for bearing the uncertainty associated with the amount and timing of non-financial risks (e.g., mortality, morbidity, lapse, persistence, and expense volatility). Financial risks are captured separately in the discount rate or economic scenario generators.

Unlike Solvency II—which prescribes a fixed 4.75% Cost of Capital method—IFRS 17 allows entities methodological choice to estimate RA, typically employing:

  • Value at Risk (VaR)

  • Tail Value at Risk (TVaR) / Expected Shortfall

  • Cost of Capital (CoC) formulations

Entities must explicitly disclose the confidence level equivalent corresponding to their chosen Risk Adjustment methodology.

Block 4: The Contractual Service Margin (CSM)

The Contractual Service Margin (CSM) represents the unearned, expected profit that the entity will recognize as it provides services over the contract lifecycle.

At initial recognition:

  • If Fulfillment Cash Flows (FCF) (Blocks 1 + 2 + 3) result in a net inflow (a net structural credit), the contract group is profitable. The initial CSM is established as an equal and opposite offsetting balance so that no day-one gain hits profit or loss ().

  • If FCF results in a net outflow, the contract group is onerous. The CSM is set to zero, and the net loss is recognized immediately in as a Loss Component within the LRC.

Subsequent Measurement under GMM / BBA

At each subsequent balance-sheet reporting date, the CSM is systematically unlocked and updated. Under GMM, the roll-forward mechanism operates as follows:

  1. Interest Accrual: The opening CSM is accreted using the locked-in discount rates determined at initial recognition.

  2. Unlocking for Operating Assumptions: Changes in future fulfillment cash flows relating to future service—such as revised lapse assumptions, updated mortality tables, or administrative cost shifts—adjust the CSM balance directly, absorbing P&L volatility.

  3. Financial Deviations: Changes in financial variables (interest rate shifts, market movements) do not unlock the CSM under GMM. They flow directly through or through Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) if the entity elects the OCI option to mitigate accounting mismatches.

  4. CSM Release (Amortization): The remaining balance is multiplied by a ratio based on Coverage Units delivered during the period relative to total remaining coverage units. This calculated amount is recognized as Insurance Revenue in profit or loss.

This concludes Part I: The Foundational Mechanics and the General Measurement Model (GMM).

1. The General Measurement Model (GMM) / Building Block Approach (BBA)

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.