YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
athletes  coverage  defense  defensive  football  linebackers  lineman  linemen  offenses  offensive  running  rushers  safety  spread  tackle  
LATEST POSTS

What Is the Weakness of the 335 Defense?

What Is the Weakness of the 335 Defense?

Football isn’t chess. It’s more like barroom brawls disguised as strategy sessions, where coaches send 250-pound men to do psychological warfare with shoulder pads. The 335—three down linemen, three linebackers, five defensive backs—emerged from necessity. Spread offenses were eating traditional 4-3 defenses alive. So someone said, “Fine. Let’s go lighter. Faster. Let’s match their athletes with ours.” Smart. But not bulletproof.

How the 335 Defense Works: Speed Over Size

At its core, the 335 is a response. Not just to spread offenses, but to the evolution of college football in the early 2000s. You couldn’t out-line-em up anymore—teams were lining up in shotgun with four receivers and a running back who looked more like a slot receiver. The old rules didn’t apply. So coordinators got creative. The base alignment uses three defensive linemen: two ends and a nose tackle, typically undersized. Their job? Penetrate. Collapse the pocket. Cause chaos. The three linebackers—often hybrids—are free to flow, blitz, or drop into coverage. Then there are the five DBs, ready to cover sideline to sideline.

It’s a bit like bringing a knife to a gunfight—except your knife is faster, and you’ve trained your guys to dodge bullets. That works… until someone fires a cannon. And that’s exactly where the weakness starts to show.

The issue remains: this scheme demands elite athletes, not just good players. You need edge rushers who can beat tackles one-on-one. You need safeties who play like linebackers. You need discipline in gap control—because if one guy gets washed out, there’s no fat lineman behind him to absorb the hit. There’s just open field and a quarterback grinning.

Personnel Requirements: Not Every Program Can Run It

Let’s be clear about this: the 335 defense is not plug-and-play. You can’t just draw it up on a whiteboard and expect results. You need specific bodies. A 280-pound defensive end who can beat 320-pound tackles off the snap? Rare. A safety who can take on a fullback at the point of attack and then cover a tight end downfield? That’s a first-round draft pick, not a walk-on.

And because most schools don’t stockpile those kinds of athletes, they end up trying to fit square pegs into round holes. A linebacker playing safety because he’s the fastest guy available. A defensive tackle forced to play end despite lacking the burst. It’s duct tape and hope. That explains why you see the 335 thrive at Alabama or Texas but collapse at mid-majors without top-tier recruiting.

Gap Integrity: One Mistake and the House Falls

Imagine you’re a defensive lineman. You’re responsible for controlling a B-gap—the space between guard and tackle. You’re supposed to hold it, force the runner back inside. But the guard pulls and seals you off. In a 4-3, there’s a linebacker behind you, maybe even a second lineman. In the 335? You’re the last line of defense on that side. Once you’re moved, there’s nothing but green grass.

And that’s the reality. Because only three linemen are on the field, each bears double the responsibility. They can’t get pushed back. They can’t hesitate. They can’t miss assignments. One slip—one misstep in gap discipline—and the running back is into the second level before the linebackers even turn their heads. It happened to Oklahoma in 2019 against LSU. Joe Burrow wasn’t even the problem. It was Clyde Edwards-Helaire slicing through A-gaps like butter because the nose tackle got double-teamed and no one rotated over in time.

Why the 335 Struggles Against Power Running Games

You want to beat a 335? Run straight at it. Not with draws or counters. Not with misdirection. Just brute force, downhill, line-of-scrimmage football. The kind old-school coaches used to love. Because here’s the truth: three linemen can’t hold the point against four offensive linemen unless they’re superheroes. Physics don’t lie. That’s why teams like Iowa and Wisconsin still run the ball 40 times a game and win. They don’t care about tempo. They care about leverage, weight, and time of possession.

In 2022, Michigan ran for 297 yards against Ohio State’s hybrid 335 setup. Hassan Haskins had 169 of those. How? Simple: they double-teamed the ends, sealed the C-gaps, and let fullbacks lead through the A-gap. The linebackers? They were blocked or delayed. The safeties? They were too far off the ball to matter. It was a clinic in how to exploit light fronts.

And that’s the contradiction. The 335 was designed to counter speed. But it folds under power. It’s like building a sports car to win a tractor pull.

Two-Back Sets Expose the Undermanned Front

When an offense lines up with two tight ends and a fullback, the 335 has to adjust. Fast. Maybe they shift into a more traditional front. Maybe they substitute in a bigger lineman. But that takes time. And substitutions tip your hand. So now you’re reacting, not dictating. The offense controls the pace.

That’s what happened at the 2021 Cotton Bowl. Alabama’s 335 faced off against Cincinnati’s power spread. But Cincy didn’t just spread it out—they ran 18 plays with two backs or an H-back. Result? 4.7 yards per carry. Not flashy, but enough to sustain drives and keep Tua Tagovailoa on the bench longer than expected. It wasn’t a blowout. It was a grind. And the 335 didn’t grind well.

Short Yardage and Goal-Line Situations Are Problematic

Goal-line stands are about mass, not finesse. The 335 isn’t built for that. Most teams switch to a 4-3 or even a 5-2 in those situations. Which means you’re admitting the scheme has limits. Why run a defense that gives up 68% conversion rate in short-yardage scenarios when you can plug in extra linemen and stop it 82% of the time?

And because you’re constantly substituting, you lose continuity. The rhythm breaks. The defense gets disjointed. Opponents notice. They start calling timeout, watching your personnel, waiting for the switch. Then they run the exact play you’re weakest against. That’s not theoretical—that’s what Oregon did to USC in 2023, third-and-goal from the 1. Fake dive, pitch to the corner. Touchdown. The safety had come up hard. The corner was blocked. The end was sealed. Nothing worked.

Pass Protection and the Blitz Blind Spot

The 335 loves to blitz. It’s part of the identity. Rotate a safety. Bring a linebacker from the backside. Confuse the quarterback. But here’s the catch: when you only have three linemen, you can’t afford to send extra rushers if the protection holds. Because if the O-line picks it up, there’s no fourth guy to collapse the pocket.

And that’s exactly where elite offensive lines feast. Think about it: you’re dropping seven into coverage, rushing four. But in the 335, you’re often rushing three. So you better win your individual matchups. If the left tackle walls off the edge rusher, and the center handles the nose, the quarterback has all day. And with five DBs on the field, there’s no safety lurking in the middle of the field to break up the slant or jump the out route.

It happened in the 2020 Peach Bowl. Notre Dame’s offensive line didn’t allow a sack. They gave Ian Book 3.2 seconds on average per dropback. And he wasn’t even a top-tier QB. Now imagine a guy like Jayden Daniels facing that same front. He sees a three-man rush, recognizes coverage, hits the deep cross in rhythm. Touchdown.

335 vs 4-3: Which Is Better Against Modern Offenses?

Let’s cut through the noise. The 4-3 is predictable. The 335 is flexible. But flexibility comes at a cost. The 4-3 has built-in redundancy. If the defensive tackle gets moved, the linebacker has a chance to fill. In the 335, if the nose gets washed out, the back is in the secondary before you blink.

But—and this is a big but—the 4-3 can’t cover modern passing attacks without nickel packages. Which means they’re subbing too. So now you’re comparing two sub-packages: the 4-3 nickel (four down linemen, three linebackers, four DBs, one extra corner) versus the base 335. The difference? One lineman. But that one lineman changes how the entire front operates.

Data from the 2023 season shows that 335 defenses allowed 7.1 yards per pass attempt, while 4-3 nickel schemes allowed 6.8. Not a massive gap. But on the ground? 335 units gave up 4.9 yards per carry. The 4-3 nickel? 4.3. That’s a real difference over 25 carries.

I find this overrated—the idea that speed always beats size. Sometimes, mass wins. Especially in December.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the 335 Defense Work in the NFL?

Not as a base defense. The NFL has too many elite offensive linemen and power-running schemes. Some teams use 3-4 looks that resemble the 335, but they have bigger, more versatile linemen. Think of the Ravens’ hybrid fronts—they bring extra rushers, but they don’t stay light. The physicality of the pros exposes light fronts too easily. That said, college teams will keep using it—because college offenses are faster, lighter, and more spread out.

What Teams Run the 335 Successfully?

Alabama under Nick Saban used it to dominate for years. So did Oklahoma under Lincoln Riley (defensively coordinated by Alex Grinch). LSU in their 2019 championship run. The common thread? Five-star athletes at key positions. Elite edge rushers. Safeties who could tackle and cover. Without that talent, it’s a liability.

How Do You Attack a 335 Defense?

Two ways: power run between the tackles, or quick passes to stress the linebackers in coverage. Use tight ends. Use fullbacks. Force them to defend the middle of the field. Make the safeties make tackles in space. And on third down, look for the two-receiver run—where the defense thinks pass, but you hand off behind a pulling guard. It works more often than you’d think.

The Bottom Line

The 335 defense is a calculated risk. It sacrifices control in the trenches for adaptability in space. That works—until it doesn’t. When you face a team that can impose its will physically, the scheme cracks. You can’t out-athlete brute strength forever. The data is still lacking on long-term sustainability, and experts disagree on whether it’s a trend or a fad. Honestly, it is unclear if it’ll survive another decade of evolving offensive football.

But here’s my take: use it as a change-up, not a starter. A situational weapon, not a base identity. Because relying on the 335 to win championship games? That’s betting your season on speed holding the point. And we’re far from it being a sure thing.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.