YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
coaches  college  defensive  division  football  linemen  offensive  player  players  position  programs  quarterbacks  scholarship  scholarships  school  
LATEST POSTS

What Is the Easiest Position in Football to Get a Scholarship?

Let’s be clear about this: the easiest position isn’t the flashiest. It’s often the one nobody notices—until something goes wrong. And that’s exactly where the opportunity lies.

The Reality of College Football Scholarships: How the System Actually Works

NCAA Division I programs offer up to 85 full-ride scholarships per team. That number drops to 36 in FCS and even fewer in Division II and III. But here’s the catch: not every player gets a full scholarship. Many get partials. Some get walk-on spots with the hope of earning funding later. The thing is, coaches don’t just look for talent—they look for fit, reliability, and long-term development. A 6’6”, 280-pound kid with average agility might not wow scouts at a camp, but if he’s consistent, coachable, and strong in the weight room? He’s valuable. Especially if he plays on the line.

The issue remains: skill positions like quarterback and wide receiver get the hype. But those roles are also more volatile. A QB might dominate junior year, then lose his starting spot after a slump. Or get injured. Meanwhile, offensive linemen are often recruited earlier—not because they’re stars, but because their development curve is longer. You can’t teach size. You can’t fake strength. And because linemen take time to mature, programs lock them down by sophomore or junior year of high school. That’s a strategic move. Because the pipeline is predictable—or at least, they want it to be.

Football scholarships aren’t handed out like participation trophies. There are 85 slots. There are 2,000+ high school seniors dreaming of one. And only a fraction make it. But not all positions face the same odds.

Offensive Linemen: The Unsung Heroes with the Best Shot

It’s not glamorous. You won’t see offensive linemen on cereal boxes. Their stats don’t appear in box scores. But try winning without them. Go ahead. The problem is, you can’t. Even elite quarterbacks need protection. And that’s why teams invest. Left tackles, especially, are critical. They protect the quarterback’s blind side—usually the most vulnerable. Yet, beyond that single high-leverage role, the rest of the line operates in relative anonymity. And that anonymity is an advantage.

Why Size and Consistency Trump Highlight Reels

High school athletes grow. Some explode in height and weight between 16 and 19. Linemen benefit most from this. A player who’s 6’3” and 240 pounds as a junior might be 6’6” and 290 by college. That kind of projection is gold for recruiters. Skill players don’t scale that way. A 5’10” running back isn’t suddenly 6’2”. A 170-pound wide receiver doesn’t turn into a 220-pound monster. But offensive linemen? The ceiling is higher. And recruiters know it.

Data from the National College Player Association shows that 72% of FBS offensive linemen were not top-100 national recruits. Compare that to 38% for wide receivers and 29% for quarterbacks. That’s telling. It means late bloomers get chances. It means raw potential matters more than polish. And because of that, the barrier to entry is lower. You don’t need to be the best athlete. You need to be strong, durable, and coachable.

Positional Depth and Injury Buffers

Teams carry multiple linemen. A typical roster might have 12 to 15 offensive linemen. Why? Because injuries happen. Rotations matter. Depth is non-negotiable. But how many wide receivers do they carry? Usually 8 to 10. And even fewer quarterbacks—typically 3. So mathematically, there are more spots. And those spots aren’t just backups. They’re developmental assets. Coaches know that a sophomore lineman might not start until his junior or senior year. So they recruit with patience.

That said, not every lineman gets equal attention. Guards and centers are often overlooked compared to tackles. But they’re still valuable. Especially in pro-style offenses that rely on power runs and complex blocking schemes.

Quarterbacks and Skill Positions: The Myth of Automatic Advantage

You’d think the guy throwing touchdowns would have the inside track. But the reality? It’s the opposite. Quarterback recruitment is one of the most volatile, high-risk areas in college football. One bad game. One growth spurt that doesn’t come. One change in offensive system—and you’re off the radar. And because every program needs only one or two, the competition is insane. There are over 15,000 high school QBs in the U.S. annually. Only about 700 get FBS scholarships. That’s a 4.7% shot.

Why Being a "System QB" Can Backfire

Many high school quarterbacks thrive in spread offenses that emphasize short passes and read-options. But that doesn’t always translate. College programs want decision-makers, not just runners. And if you’ve never operated under center or read complex coverages? You’re at a disadvantage. Plus, schools often recruit multiple QBs in a class—then redshirt all but one. The others either transfer or ride the bench. So even with a scholarship, your playing time isn’t guaranteed.

Wide receivers and running backs? Same issue. They’re replaceable. Fast, yes. But speed doesn’t age well in recruiting if technique lags. And because the market is flooded with athletes who can run 4.5-second 40s, standing out requires more than measurables.

Kickers and Punters: The Dark Horse Contenders

Now here’s an outlier. Special teams players don’t get much love—until they miss. Then they’re vilified. But here’s the twist: placekickers often get scholarships despite not touching the ball every play. Why? Because one kick can win a game. And because there are only about 200 elite high school kickers nationwide, the competition pool is small. Some programs use specialized camps like Kornblue Kicking to evaluate talent. And because most football coaches aren’t kicking experts, they rely on video and stats.

A kicker who can consistently hit 45-yard field goals? That’s rare. And worth a scholarship. But here’s the catch: they’re often walk-ons who earn funding later. Full rides are uncommon. Still, the path exists. And because they’re low-maintenance (no heavy contact, fewer injuries), they’re safe bets.

But—and this is important—not every school treats kickers the same. Power Five conferences? More likely to fund them. Group of Five? Often ask them to walk on first.

Defensive Players: Where the Odds Shift Again

Defensive linemen are valuable. Edge rushers? Even more so. A player who can sack the QB is a game-changer. But here’s where it gets tricky: consistency. Can you pressure the passer every week? Or are you just fast in a straight line? Linebackers need football IQ. Safeties need range. Corners need recovery speed. The bar is high. And because defensive performance is harder to project from high school film, coaches lean on measurable traits. The result? Only the elite get early offers.

Data is still lacking on exact scholarship distribution by defensive position. But anecdotal evidence from recruiting services like 247Sports and Rivals suggests that defensive backs and linebackers are often the most underrated in terms of availability. That said, unless you’re a top-50 national prospect, your chances drop fast.

Frequently Asked Questions

Real questions. Real answers.

Can a walk-on still get a scholarship later?

Yes. Absolutely. In fact, about 20% of FBS scholarship athletes started as walk-ons. Some earn it through performance. Others fill gaps when injuries hit. Walk-ons work harder—because they have to. And coaches notice. That’s how a backup offensive lineman becomes a starter by year three. And that’s also why showing up matters. Even if you don’t get the offer day one.

Do smaller schools offer more opportunities?

Without question. Division II, Division III, and NAIA programs don’t have 85 scholarships. But they have more flexibility. D-III schools don’t offer athletic scholarships—but many provide academic aid that covers most of the bill. And because competition is less intense, standout high school players have a better shot. A 6’4”, 260-pound kid in rural Ohio might not crack an FBS roster. But he could dominate in the GLIAC or MIAA. And that’s a real path.

What about international players?

They’re a growing force. Especially in kicking and offensive line. Programs like Utah State and Colorado State have recruited Australian punters for years. And European linemen? A few have made the jump. The process is harder—visa issues, unfamiliar systems, cultural shifts. But the gap in competition can make it worthwhile. And because the pool is small, standing out is easier.

The Bottom Line: It’s Not About the Position—It’s About the Fit

I am convinced that offensive line is the most accessible path. But that doesn’t mean it’s easy. Hard work isn’t a guarantee. Neither is size. But the math favors blockers over scorers. Because the game still runs through the trenches. Because coaches trust development. Because 85 scholarships have to go somewhere—and they often go to the guys who don’t care about fame.

So if you’re 6’5” and strong, and you like the sound of pads cracking, consider the line. If you’re 5’11” with a rocket arm? You’ll need more than talent. You’ll need a story. A system. A break.

And that’s the irony. The easiest position isn’t the one with the most glory. It’s the one nobody wants. Until they need it. Then it’s everything.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.