YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
animosity  commanders  competitive  cowboys  cultural  dallas  hatred  history  intensity  matchups  players  rivalries  rivalry  rivalry's  washington  
LATEST POSTS

What is the most hated rivalry in the NFL?

Why the Cowboys-Commanders rivalry burns hotter than any other

The Dallas Cowboys and Washington Commanders share a rivalry that goes beyond the field. It's rooted in geography, history, and an almost tribal sense of identity. These teams have faced each other over 120 times since 1960, creating a database of memorable moments that fuel the animosity.

What makes this rivalry unique is how it combines multiple factors. First, there's the proximity factor—though not geographically close, both teams represent major media markets in the Eastern time zone. Then there's the historical context: both franchises have experienced periods of dominance, creating natural competition for supremacy in the NFC East.

The Commanders (formerly Redskins) have historically viewed the Cowboys as arrogant and entitled, while Cowboys fans see Washington as their primary obstacle to divisional dominance. This dynamic creates a perfect storm of resentment that intensifies with every close game, controversial call, or playoff implication.

The numbers behind the hatred

Statistically, this rivalry delivers. Since 1960, the Cowboys lead the all-time series 74-43-2, but the win percentage tells only part of the story. The games are often decided by razor-thin margins, with over 30% of matchups decided by 7 points or less. This closeness creates drama that sticks in fans' memories.

Television ratings for Cowboys-Commanders games consistently rank among the highest for regular-season NFL broadcasts. In 2022, their Thanksgiving matchup drew over 30 million viewers, demonstrating that the hatred translates directly into commercial value.

How this rivalry compares to other NFL feuds

While Cowboys-Commanders tops the hatred charts, other rivalries generate significant animosity. The Green Bay Packers-Chicago Bears contest, for instance, boasts the oldest rivalry in NFL history, dating back to 1921. Yet something about the Cowboys-Commanders feud feels more personal, more intense.

The Pittsburgh Steelers-Baltimore Ravens rivalry comes closest in terms of mutual hatred. These teams have produced some of the most physical, hard-hitting games in modern NFL history. However, the Steelers-Ravens animosity is more about playing style and recent history than the deep cultural divide that characterizes Cowboys-Commanders.

Even the New England Patriots-Indianapolis Colts rivalry, which featured Peyton Manning versus Tom Brady, never reached the same level of visceral hatred. That feud was more about respect between elite competitors than genuine animosity.

What makes a rivalry truly hated

Through analyzing multiple rivalries, certain patterns emerge. The most hated rivalries share these characteristics:

Geographic proximity: Teams that frequently play each other develop more intense feelings. The Eagles-Cowboys rivalry, for instance, benefits from Dallas and Philadelphia being relatively close.

Competitive balance: When teams are evenly matched, every game matters more. The Cowboys-Commanders series has seen periods where neither team could establish clear dominance for more than a few years.

Cultural contrast: The Cowboys represent Texas swagger and corporate success, while Washington (particularly during the Joe Gibbs era) embodied blue-collar determination. This contrast amplifies the rivalry's intensity.

The role of media in amplifying NFL hatred

Modern media has transformed how rivalries develop and are perceived. The NFL's marketing machine recognizes that hate sells, and nowhere is this more evident than in the Cowboys-Commanders narrative.

Prime-time scheduling plays a crucial role. When these teams meet on Sunday Night Football or Thanksgiving, the broadcast packages emphasize historical animosity. Commentators recount past controversies, highlight personal feuds between players, and build anticipation for the latest chapter in this ongoing saga.

Social media has added another dimension to rivalry hatred. Fans now engage in real-time trash talk during games, creating viral moments that further inflame tensions. A controversial touchdown or questionable penalty becomes instant fuel for the rivalry's fire.

How players feed the rivalry

Players understand the business value of rivalries. When Cowboys players publicly dismiss Washington's chances, or when Commanders defenders promise to "take it to" Dallas, they're not just talking—they're building the narrative that makes these games must-watch television.

The trash talk extends beyond game days. Training camp comments, pre-season interviews, and social media posts all contribute to the rivalry's mythology. Players who master this art—like former Cowboys receiver Dez Bryant or Commanders cornerback Josh Norman—become central figures in the rivalry's story.

The economics of hatred in the NFL

The NFL benefits tremendously from fostering rivalries. Hate drives ticket sales, merchandise purchases, and television ratings. The Cowboys-Commanders rivalry is particularly valuable because both fan bases are passionate and geographically dispersed.

Ticket prices for these matchups often exceed $300 for upper-level seats, with premium seats reaching $1,000 or more. This represents a significant premium over regular-season games between these teams and others.

Merchandise sales tell another story. When these teams face off, sales of opponent-branded gear increase dramatically. Fans want to display their allegiance, and the more intense the rivalry, the more likely they are to purchase special edition merchandise.

The playoff factor

Nothing intensifies hatred like playoff implications. When Cowboys-Commanders games determine division titles or wild-card berths, the animosity reaches its peak. These high-stakes matchups create memories that last generations.

Historically, both teams have been competitive in the same eras. The 1970s saw both franchises reach multiple Super Bowls. The 1980s featured back-and-forth dominance. Even in recent years, both teams have contended for NFC East titles simultaneously, keeping the rivalry relevant.

Why some rivalries fade while others intensify

Not all NFL rivalries maintain their intensity. The San Francisco 49ers-Dallas Cowboys rivalry, for instance, was once considered the league's premier feud but has cooled considerably as both teams experienced down cycles.

The key to sustained hatred is simultaneous competitiveness. When both teams are good—or both are bad—the rivalry remains relevant. The Cowboys-Commanders rivalry has benefited from this dynamic, with both franchises rarely experiencing extended periods of irrelevance simultaneously.

Coaching changes also impact rivalry intensity. When legendary coaches like Tom Landry (Cowboys) or Joe Gibbs (Commanders) were involved, the games took on additional significance. Their strategic battles became part of the rivalry's fabric.

The role of iconic players

Certain players become synonymous with rivalries. Roger Staubach for Dallas, Joe Theismann for Washington—these quarterbacks defined their franchises during crucial rivalry periods. More recently, players like Tony Romo and Jason Witten for Dallas, or Clinton Portis and Santana Moss for Washington, have added new chapters to the rivalry's story.

The most effective rivalry players understand their role extends beyond statistics. They embrace the villain status when playing in opposing stadiums, feeding off the crowd's animosity to elevate their performance.

The psychological impact of NFL rivalries

Rivalries affect more than just game outcomes—they impact fan psychology, player performance, and even personal relationships. Cowboys fans who marry Commanders fans often report that game days become tense household events.

Sports psychologists note that rivalries provide fans with a sense of identity and belonging. Supporting a team in a heated rivalry gives fans something to rally around, creating community bonds that extend beyond football.

For players, rivalry games bring additional pressure. The fear of letting down one's fan base in these crucial matchups can affect performance. Some players thrive under this pressure, while others struggle with the heightened intensity.

The generational aspect

Rivalries are often passed down through families. Parents who experienced painful losses to their team's rival share those memories with their children, creating a multi-generational hatred that feels almost inherited.

This generational aspect explains why some rivalries maintain their intensity even during periods of competitive imbalance. The historical baggage matters as much as current performance.

The future of NFL rivalries

As the NFL evolves, so do its rivalries. League realignment, rule changes, and the increasing mobility of players all impact how rivalries develop and are maintained.

The Cowboys-Commanders rivalry faces new challenges. Both teams have new coaching staffs, and the Commanders' rebranding (from Redskins to Commanders) represents a fresh start that could either intensify or diminish the rivalry's traditional elements.

Younger fans, raised in the social media era, experience rivalries differently than previous generations. Their hatred is often expressed through memes, tweets, and online forums rather than face-to-face confrontations or traditional media.

Can manufactured rivalries work?

The NFL has attempted to create new rivalries through scheduling, marketing, and even rule changes. The league's efforts to promote the Packers-49ers rivalry in the 2010s, for instance, had mixed results. While these games often feature high-quality football, they lack the organic hatred that develops over decades.

True rivalries seem to require time to develop. They need shared history, competitive balance, and cultural significance. The Cowboys-Commanders rivalry has all these elements, which explains why it remains the NFL's most hated matchup.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which NFL rivalry has the most playoff meetings?

The Pittsburgh Steelers-Baltimore Ravens rivalry holds the record for most playoff meetings between division rivals, with 3 postseason matchups. However, the Green Bay Packers-Chicago Bears have met 3 times in the playoffs as well, despite being in different divisions now.

Do NFL players actually hate their rivals?

The answer varies by player and situation. Some players embrace the rivalry's intensity and develop genuine animosity toward opponents. Others view it as a business necessity—they understand that rivalry games get more attention and can boost their profiles, even if they don't personally feel the hatred.

Which rivalry has the most lopsided record?

The Chicago Bears lead the all-time series against the Detroit Lions 70-36-5, making it one of the most lopsided rivalries in terms of wins. However, the intensity remains because Detroit fans particularly resent Chicago's historical dominance.

How do NFL rivalries affect betting lines?

Rivalry games often see adjusted betting lines due to the unpredictable nature of these matchups. Oddsmakers account for the emotional intensity, potential for physical play affecting key players, and the tendency for underdog teams to perform above their normal level in rivalry games.

Verdict: The enduring power of NFL hatred

The Dallas Cowboys-Washington Commanders rivalry stands as the NFL's most hated because it combines all the elements that make sports rivalries compelling: historical significance, competitive balance, cultural contrast, and emotional intensity. This hatred isn't manufactured by the league—it's cultivated by decades of shared history and mutual resentment.

What makes this rivalry particularly fascinating is how it evolves while maintaining its core intensity. New players, coaches, and even team names can't diminish the fundamental animosity between these franchises and their fan bases.

As the NFL continues to grow and change, the Cowboys-Commanders rivalry serves as a reminder that some aspects of sports remain constant. The desire to defeat your most hated opponent, to claim bragging rights in your region, and to be part of a tradition that spans generations—these elements transcend statistics and highlight why we love sports in the first place.

The next time these teams meet, remember that you're witnessing more than just a football game. You're watching the latest chapter in a story that has been unfolding for over 60 years, a story built on competition, resentment, and the kind of passionate hatred that only sports can produce.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.