YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
agility  answer  background  candidates  evaluation  hardest  interview  muscle  people  physical  police  process  psychological  questions  written  
LATEST POSTS

Behind the Blue Line: What’s the Hardest Part of a Police Test and Why Most Candidates Flunk Out Before the Academy

Behind the Blue Line: What’s the Hardest Part of a Police Test and Why Most Candidates Flunk Out Before the Academy

The Evolution of Modern Law Enforcement Screening: More Than Just Muscle

Go back thirty years, and the barrier to entry was essentially a pulse, a clean record, and the ability to bench press your own weight. Things have shifted dramatically since the 1990s. Today, departments like the Los Angeles Police Department face unprecedented scrutiny, which explains why the scrutiny on candidates has reached a near-paranoid level. The modern selection process is a multi-tiered gauntlet designed to break you down mentally before you ever touch a badge.

The Disappearing Cadet Corps

Consider the raw data from major metropolitan forces. In 2024, out of every 100 hopefuls who filled out an initial application for the Chicago Police Department, only about 4.8% actually walked into the academy. That is a steeper rejection rate than Harvard University's undergraduate admissions. Why? Because the definition of a good cop has evolved from a physical enforcer to a community mediator, crisis counselor, and legal expert wrapped into one uniform. The issue remains that the testing matrix tries to measure all of these simultaneously, creating a bizarrely complex hurdle.

Why the Written Exams Are Deceptive

And then we have the standard cognitive battery—the LEAB or the POST exam. Candidates spend hundreds of dollars on study guides, obsessing over situational judgment questions and basic arithmetic. Yet, here is a sharp opinion that contradicts conventional wisdom: the written exam is actually a joke. If you possess a high school reading level, you will likely pass. The trick is that it is merely a compliance check to weed out the utterly illiterate; it is not the real filter.

Psychological Evaluation: Where the Mind Meets the Wall

This is where it gets tricky. The psychological evaluation—split between a massive written inventory and a face-to-face interrogation with a clinical psychologist—is routinely cited by insiders as the true answer to what’s the hardest part of a police test. You are forced to sit in a room and answer over 500 questions on tests like the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-3). The queries repeat. They twist. They ask if you like mechanics magazines, then three hundred questions later, they ask if you enjoy fixing things, looking for a microscopic tear in your consistency.

The Paradox of the Psych Interview

Honestly, it's unclear what specific cocktail of personality traits ensures a perfect pass, as even top-tier industrial psychologists disagree on the exact baseline. But the face-to-face interview is brutal. A shrink, often one who has spent twenty years analyzing crooked cops and traumatized veterans, stares at you across a desk. They will intentionally provoke you. They might insult your demeanor or bring up a minor infraction from your high school days just to watch your carotid artery throb. Can you maintain composure when a licensed professional is gaslighting you? If you snap, or even if your tone gets defensive, you fail. That changes everything for an applicant who thought they were just going in for a chat.

The Trap of Attempting to Game the System

Applicants try to outsmart the MMPI. They answer everything how they think a Boy Scout would answer. Big mistake. The test has built-in "Lie Scales" and "Defensiveness Scales" calculated by algorithms that flag artificial consistency. If your score indicates you are pretending to be a saint, the system automatically triggers a rejection. We're far from it being a simple test of sanity; it is a trap for the disingenuous.

The Background Investigation and the Polygraph Nightmare

If your mind survives the psychologist, you get handed over to a detective whose entire job is to dig up your dead pets. The background phase is a relentless, months-long colonoscopy of your personal life. People don't think about this enough when they apply, assuming that a lack of a felony conviction means they are gold. Yet, investigators will interview your neighbors, your high school gym teacher, and even your ex-spouses from a decade ago.

The Truth Machine Panic

But the real psychological terror of the background check is the polygraph, or the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer. Let us be clear: the scientific validity of the lie detector is highly debatable, and federal courts largely reject it. Regardless of the science, police departments love it as an interrogation tool. You are hooked up to pneumograph tubes around your chest, galvanized plates on your fingers, and a blood pressure cuff. The examiner asks about your past drug use, thefts, or undetected crimes.

The Confession Trap at Dawn

But the polygraph doesn't usually fail people because the machine jumps. It fails people because they panic and confess to something they shouldn't have. The examiner stares at the squiggly lines on the screen, sighs heavily, and says, "Look, John, something is twitching here on the marijuana question. Are you sure it was only three times in college?" Suddenly, the panicked candidate blabs about the time they bought an ounce of weed in New Jersey back in 2022. Boom. Disqualified for deception during a police test background check. As a result: the machine didn't catch them; their own loose lips did.

Physical Agility Versus Psychological Agility: The Real Contrast

Every recruit forum online is packed with guys asking how fast they need to run the 1.5-mile course or how many trigger pulls they need to execute during the physical capacity test. For the physical portion—usually modeled after the Cooper Institute standards—you need a basic level of athletic competence. You jump a fence, drag a 165-pound dummy, and sprint a few hundred yards. It is stressful, sure.

The Muscle Memory Fallacy

Except that you can train for a physical test. You can wake up at 5:00 AM every day for six months, run the track, lift weights, and guarantee a passing score. It is a known variable. You cannot easily train your subconscious to hide anxiety during a three-hour interrogation about your deepest financial secrets or past infidelities. Hence, the physical test is a mountain you can see and climb, while the psychological and background phases are a swamp filled with hidden quicksand. I have seen former Division I athletes collapse in tears after a background interview because the investigator hinted they knew about an old, unprosecuted shoplifting incident. Muscle means nothing when your integrity is on the chopping block.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.