The Longest Shadow: Unearthing What is the Oldest Motto in the Army Today
The oldest motto in the Army is widely considered to be "This We'll Defend," a phrase that has defined the United States Army since before the nation even formally existed.
The Semantic Architecture of Military Identity and Heritage
Defining "oldest" in a military context is where it gets tricky because you have to separate the age of the unit from the age of the specific words they scream during a bayonet charge. People don't think about this enough, but a regiment might trace its roots back to 1636—like the Massachusetts National Guard—yet only adopt a catchy Latin phrase during a Victorian-era rebranding. We are hunting for the intersection of antiquity and official adoption. The term "motto" functions as a distilled mission statement, a linguistic anchor that keeps a soldier grounded when the cognitive load of combat threatens to shatter their focus. It is more than branding; it is a psychological contract. In short, these phrases represent a lineage of blood and ink that spans generations of service members who likely never met but shared the same five or six words as a North Star.
Decoding the 1778 War Office Seal
When the Continental Congress needed to make things official during the chaos of the Revolution, they didn't just hire a graphic designer. They created the Board of War. On May 27, 1778, the seal was realized, featuring a Roman cuirass and a Phrygian cap—the "Liberty Cap"—supported by a sword and a pike. But the real weight lay in the scroll held by the rattlesnake, a common symbol of colonial defiance. That scroll carried the original 1778 inscription: "This We'll Defend." Why does this matter? Because it marks the first time the collective Army, not just a specific colonial militia or a local cavalry troop, stood behind a unified verbal banner. Yet, if we look at the sheer age of phrases, some regimental mottos argue for a more localized seniority. Honestly, it’s unclear to
Myths and Semantic Drift: Deciphering the Oldest Motto in the Army
The problem is that military history often functions like a game of high-stakes telephone where "This We'll Defend" gets conflated with every stray bit of Latin found on a guidon. Many enthusiasts assume that the oldest motto in the Army must belong to the oldest unit, which leads them straight to the door of the 101st Engineer Battalion or the legendary 182nd Infantry Regiment. Except that those units, despite their 1636 lineage, did not formalize their specific heraldic phrases until centuries later. Let's be clear: a unit's age and its motto's age are rarely twins. We see a recurring tendency to cite "Yield to Nothing" from the 2nd Infantry Regiment as the ancient progenitor, but its official recognition dates to the 1920s. Which explains why historians get so prickly when you mix up lineage dates with heraldry approval dates.
The Latin Fallacy
Do not be fooled by the gravitas of a dead language. Because many modern brigades adopt Latin phrases like "Volens et Potens" to sound ancient, civilian observers frequently mistake these for 18th-century relics. The issue remains that the War Department didn't even have a standardized process for Distinctive Unit Insignia until 1921. Before that, mottos were largely informal nicknames or temporary battle cries. You might think "E Pluribus Unum" qualifies as the oldest motto in the Army, but that is a national hallmark, not a specific service-wide combat identifier. It lacks the specific tactical DNA required for this title.
The General Staff Confusion
Another misconception involves the United States Military Academy at West Point. Their iconic "Duty, Honor, Country" is etched into the very granite of American identity, yet it wasn't formally adopted until 1898. While it feels as old as the hills, it is actually a newcomer compared to the Continental Army's early identify markers. In short, longevity is a slippery fish in the world of military semiotics.
The Archival Shadow: The Expert's Perspective on Authenticity
If you want to find the real ghost in the machine, you have to look at the 1778 War Office Seal. This is where the oldest motto in the Army truly resides in its larval form. Experts often debate whether a motto must be spoken by a soldier or printed on a flag to count as "official." (The Bureau of Heraldry is surprisingly picky about this distinction). Yet, the phrase "This We'll Defend" appeared on the Infantry's official seal long before it was tattooed on every
💡 Key Takeaways
Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is 6 a good height?
The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
2. Is 172 cm good for a man?
Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.
3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?
Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.
4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?
The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.
5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?
How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).
6. How tall is a average 15 year old?
Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years
112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)
64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years
123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)
67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years
134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)
68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years
142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)
69.0" (175.2 cm)
7. How to get taller at 18?
Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.
8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?
Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).
9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?
Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.
10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?
Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.