YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
answer  domestic  english  european  ferguson  league  liverpool  manchester  modern  numbers  premier  success  titles  trophies  united  
LATEST POSTS

Who Is More Successful: Liverpool or Manchester United?

And that’s where things get messy, emotional, and gloriously irrational. You don’t pick a side because of a spreadsheet. You pick because your dad did. Because you sang “You’ll Never Walk Alone” through tears once. Because you remember Ferguson glaring from the dugout like a vulture who’d just scented weakness. Because football isn’t baseball. It’s religion, with flawed prophets and resurrected legends.

Historical Trajectories: How Two Giants Built Their Empires

The story of Liverpool and Manchester United isn’t one of constant rivalry. They didn’t climb together. They took turns—sometimes decades apart—dominating, collapsing, then roaring back. Liverpool’s first golden era predates United’s modern identity. Founded in 1892, they won their first league title in 1901. By the time Matt Busby began rebuilding United after the Munich air disaster in 1958, Liverpool were already a regional force under Bill Shankly.

Shankly didn’t just build a team—he built a culture. He turned Anfield into a fortress, installed a boot room mentality, and laid the foundation for a dynasty that would peak under Bob Paisley. Between 1973 and 1990, Liverpool won 11 league titles and 4 European Cups. That changes everything. No English club had done that. They weren’t just winning—they were redefining dominance.

Manchester United’s real ascent came later. Busby’s 1968 European Cup win was monumental, yes. But the modern empire? That’s Sir Alex Ferguson. He took over in 1986, inherited chaos, and by 1993, delivered the league title after a 26-year drought. Then came the treble: 1999. Champions League, Premier League, FA Cup. In one season. A feat no other English club has matched. We’re far from it.

So here’s the twist: Liverpool’s peak was tighter, more concentrated in Europe. United’s was broader, spanning nearly two decades. From 1992 to 2013, they won 13 Premier League titles. That’s not dominance. That’s occupation.

Domestic Dominance: League Titles and the English Hierarchy

If success is measured purely in top-flight league wins, Manchester United leads. 20 league titles compared to Liverpool’s 19. But—and this is where people don’t think about this enough—context matters. Nine of Liverpool’s came before the Premier League era. United’s 13 came in the modern, money-soaked, globally televised league.

Liverpool’s last league title before 2020? 1990. Thirty years without the trophy they once owned. That’s a generation. Imagine being a fan. Watching United lift it year after year—1993, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2013. The frustration must have been like watching your neighbor renovate a mansion while your roof leaks.

But then Klopp arrived. 2019: Champions League. 2020: Premier League. And suddenly, the balance shifted. Not in total numbers—but in momentum. Perception. Hope. You can’t measure that in silverware, but it’s real.

European Glory: Where Liverpool Reigns Supreme

Now, transfer the spotlight to Europe. This is Liverpool’s kingdom. Six European Cups—more than any other English club. 1977, 1978, 1981, 1984, 2005, 2019. Istanbul. That comeback against Milan. Down 3-0 at halftime. Up 3-3 by full time. Won on penalties. It’s not just a match; it’s folklore.

United? Three European Cups. 1968, 1999, 2008. All dramatic. 1999 especially—Solskjær, Beckham, Sheringham, two goals in stoppage time. But three is still three. Half of Liverpool’s tally. And that’s exactly where the narrative fractures. Because in Europe, Liverpool isn’t just better—they’re legendary.

It’s a bit like comparing a sprinter to a marathon runner. United has bursts of peak excellence. Liverpool has depth, resilience, a sixth sense for chaos. They’ve reached 10 European finals. United, 6. The gap widens.

Modern Era Performance: Post-2010 Showdown

Let’s talk now. Not history. Today. Because if you’re judging based on the last 15 years, the answer shifts—again. From 2010 to 2020, United had the edge. Two more league titles. A Europa League in 2017. A League Cup in 2017 and 2023. But since Klopp took over in 2015? Liverpool’s output has been surgical.

2019: Champions League. 2020: Premier League. 2022: FA Cup and League Cup. 2023: Another final in both. And all while finishing second or first in the league five times in six seasons (2019–2024). Their points tally in 2019–20? 99. The third-highest in Premier League history.

United? Turbulent. Since Ferguson retired, they’ve cycled through six permanent managers. Moyes, Van Gaal, Mourinho, Solskjær, Ten Hag. Only Ten Hag has won silverware—two domestic cups. The league? No wins since 2013. That’s over a decade. For a club that once won four in five years, it’s a fall from grace. Or at least, a pause.

And yet—United still generates more revenue. In 2023, they were the second-highest earning club in the world (€731 million). Liverpool? Sixth (€594 million). Why? Global brand. Commercial reach. Old Trafford holds 74,000. Anfield, 53,000. The financial engine never stopped.

Trophy Count Comparison: The Numbers Don’t Lie—but They Don’t Tell the Whole Story

Let’s break it down. Because numbers are neutral. But how we read them? Total top-flight titles: - Manchester United: 20 - Liverpool: 19 European Cups: - Liverpool: 6 - Manchester United: 3 FA Cups: - Liverpool: 8 - Manchester United: 12 League Cups: - Liverpool: 10 - Manchester United: 6 Total major trophies: approximately 68 for United, 67 for Liverpool. It’s razor-thin. A tie, almost. Except— Wait. Does the Community Shield count? What about the FIFA Club World Cup? UEFA Super Cup? Some historians include them. Others don’t. The data is still lacking on consensus, honestly. But even if you add them, the gap doesn’t widen much. We’re talking one or two trophies either way.

What this means: neither club has a definitive edge. It’s not like comparing Bayern to Hoffenheim. This is Ali vs. Frazier. Brady vs. Manning. The difference is in the rhythm of success, not the total.

Frequently Asked Questions

Has Liverpool Ever Won More Titles Than Manchester United?

No, not in total. Manchester United has one more league title and more FA Cups. But Liverpool has more European Cups and League Cups. Depending on which trophies you value, the answer shifts. If you prioritize European success, Liverpool wins. If domestic dominance matters most, United takes it. Experts disagree on which metric defines “true” success.

Why Does the Rivalry Feel So Intense Despite Playing in Different Cities?

Because it’s not geographic—it’s symbolic. They represent two models of success. Liverpool: passion, European nights, emotional intensity. United: branding, longevity, commercial power. It’s a clash of identities. And when they meet, even if it’s not a derby, it feels like a referendum on who’s on top.

Who Has the Better Managerial Legacy?

Sir Alex Ferguson managed United for 26 years. Won 38 trophies. That’s a lifetime. Bill Shankly and Bob Paisley combined for 15 years at Liverpool but delivered 14 major trophies. Ferguson’s longevity is unmatched. But Paisley won three European Cups in five years—a feat no English manager has touched. So which matters more: duration or peak? I find Paisley’s run more impressive, personally. But Ferguson’s cultural impact? Undeniable.

The Bottom Line

So who’s more successful? I am convinced that the answer depends on your definition of success. If it’s total trophies: Manchester United by a hair. If it’s European legacy: Liverpool without question. If it’s cultural resonance in the modern game: Liverpool again. If it’s global brand and financial power: United still leads. There is no single verdict.

But here’s my take—personal, biased, and human: Liverpool feels more successful right now. Not because of the past, but because of momentum. Because when you watch them play, there’s urgency. Belief. A sense that history isn’t behind them—it’s something they’re still writing. United? They’re chasing ghosts. Glorious ones, yes. But still ghosts.

Football isn’t math. It’s memory. It’s that lump in your throat when the anthem plays. It’s knowing your club has walked through fire and come out singing. And for all United’s glitter, Liverpool’s soul burns brighter. That changes everything.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.