YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
approach  attempts  better  career  consistency  cristiano  knuckleball  lionel  messi's  players  ronaldo  ronaldo's  scored  success  technique  
LATEST POSTS

Who is a better free-kick taker?

The art of the dead ball: what makes a great free-kick taker?

Free-kick mastery combines several elements: technique, mental approach, and adaptability. The best dead-ball specialists can strike the ball with minimal spin, creating unpredictable movement that fools goalkeepers. They must also read defensive walls, judge distance accurately, and maintain composure under pressure.

Technical foundations

Three main techniques dominate modern free-kick taking:

  • The knuckleball: minimal spin, erratic movement
  • The curl: side spin creating predictable but difficult-to-reach trajectories
  • The power drive: straight, fast shots aimed at beating the wall

Each requires thousands of hours of practice to perfect.

Cristiano Ronaldo: power and evolution

Ronaldo's free-kick journey represents remarkable evolution. Early in his career, he relied on pure power and the knuckleball technique, famously using the "drag back" method where his foot slides under the ball to create minimal spin.

The knuckleball revolution

Ronaldo popularized the knuckleball in football, striking the ball with the instep while keeping his foot rigid. This creates unpredictable movement as air passes over the ball's seams unevenly. His approach is athletic—he takes several steps back, runs up with intensity, and strikes through the ball with maximum power.

His success rate from direct free-kicks hovers around 5-6%, which sounds low but is actually impressive given he often attempts shots from 25-30 yards out. The threat of his shooting forces defenders to form walls earlier and goalkeepers to position more cautiously.

Adaptability across leagues

What's fascinating about Ronaldo is how he adapted his free-kick technique across different leagues. In England, he perfected the knuckleball with Manchester United. In Spain, he maintained this approach despite La Liga's different ball characteristics. In Italy, he modified his technique slightly to account for Serie A's more defensive setups. And in Saudi Arabia, he's continued scoring despite playing with a new generation of defenders.

Lionel Messi: surgical precision

The curl master

Messi's free-kick technique contrasts sharply with Ronaldo's. He uses the inside of his foot to generate side spin, creating a bending trajectory that curls around or over walls into the far corner. His approach is minimalist—short run-up, subtle body shape, and delicate contact.

His success rate from direct free-kicks is notably higher than Ronaldo's, around 8-9%. This seems modest but represents greater efficiency. Messi doesn't need to hit the ball as hard; instead, he relies on placement and the ball's natural curve.

Reading the situation

Messi excels at reading defensive setups. He can identify when a wall will jump, when a goalkeeper cheats to one side, or when there's space behind the wall. His decision-making is instantaneous—he'll chip over a jumping wall, curl around a static one, or power through a gap.

His free-kick against Liverpool in the 2019 Champions League semi-final exemplifies this. From a tight angle, he bent the ball over the wall and inside the near post, a shot few players would even attempt, let alone execute.

Statistical comparison: beyond the numbers

Career free-kick goals

As of 2024, Ronaldo has scored approximately 60+ free-kicks in competitive matches, while Messi has netted around 65+. However, raw numbers tell only part of the story.

Ronaldo has taken roughly 1,000+ free-kick attempts in his career, while Messi has taken around 700-800. This means Messi scores roughly once every 11 attempts, while Ronaldo scores once every 16-17 attempts. The difference seems small but represents a significant efficiency gap over thousands of attempts.

Pressure situations

Both players have delivered in crucial moments. Ronaldo's free-kick against Spain in the 2018 World Cup was a perfect knuckleball struck under immense pressure. Messi's free-kick against the United States in the 2016 Copa America semi-final showcased his ability to deliver when it matters most.

The psychological aspect is fascinating. Ronaldo seems to thrive on the theatrical buildup—the stance, the run-up, the power. Messi's approach is almost nonchalant, yet equally effective. This reflects their broader personalities: Ronaldo as the showman, Messi as the quiet assassin.

The evolution of free-kick technique

Historical context

Before Messi and Ronaldo dominated, players like David Beckham, Juninho Pernambucano, and Roberto Carlos defined free-kick excellence. Beckham's consistency, Juninho's knuckleball before it was cool, and Carlos's physics-defying bends set the stage.

Messi and Ronaldo have built upon this foundation but taken different paths. Messi refined the curl technique to near-perfection, while Ronaldo revolutionized the knuckleball approach. Both have influenced a generation of players who now attempt these techniques.

Modern trends

Today's young players often try to emulate both. Some, like Kevin De Bruyne, focus on power and precision. Others, like Neymar, blend curl and power. The game has evolved so that free-kicks are no longer just about technique but also about deception and unpredictability.

Interestingly, as both Messi and Ronaldo aged, their free-kick approaches changed slightly. Ronaldo has become more selective, choosing his moments carefully. Messi has maintained remarkable consistency, suggesting his technique is more sustainable long-term.

Beyond Messi and Ronaldo: other free-kick specialists

The current generation

Sergio Ramos, known more for his defensive prowess, has a surprisingly high free-kick conversion rate. Players like James Ward-Prowse have built reputations almost entirely on set-piece excellence, with a success rate that would make Messi and Ronaldo proud.

Young players like Lionel Messi's potential heir, Lamine Yamal, are already showcasing free-kick abilities that suggest the art form continues evolving. The technique that defined Messi's generation—the precise curl—remains highly effective but is now complemented by power-based approaches.

Specialized free-kick takers

Some players aren't complete footballers but excel at dead balls. Consider Cristiano Ronaldo's former teammate, Andrea Pirlo, whose free-kicks were more about finesse than power. Or Ronaldinho, whose free-kicks combined curve, dip, and occasional knuckleball effects.

The modern game has seen a shift toward specialization. Teams now have designated free-kick takers for different ranges and angles. This wasn't common when Messi and Ronaldo were emerging, which partly explains their high attempt volumes.

Who is actually better? The verdict

Defining "better"

This is where opinions diverge sharply. If "better" means highest success rate and efficiency, Messi holds the edge. His 8-9% conversion rate compared to Ronaldo's 5-6% represents a significant difference over a career.

However, if "better" encompasses influence, versatility, and the ability to score from various ranges and situations, Ronaldo's case strengthens. He's scored free-kicks with both feet, from acute angles, and using different techniques throughout his career.

The context matters

Ronaldo often takes free-kicks from farther out, where success rates naturally drop. Messi frequently gets closer opportunities, sometimes within 20 yards, where curl specialists thrive. This contextual difference affects their raw statistics.

Also, Ronaldo's teams have sometimes relied on him for set-piece duties even when specialists might have been more efficient choices. This speaks to his importance but also potentially inflated his miss count.

My assessment

Honestly, this debate comes down to what you value. Messi is the more technically efficient free-kick taker—his consistency and success rate are superior. Ronaldo is the more influential and versatile practitioner—he's changed how players approach dead balls.

I find Messi's free-kick taking more impressive because he achieves higher success with what appears to be less effort. There's something almost unfair about how he can curl the ball into tiny spaces from various angles. Ronaldo's power and evolution are remarkable, but his lower success rate suggests technique matters more than athleticism in free-kick taking.

Yet I can't dismiss Ronaldo's impact. He's made defenders and goalkeepers respect every free-kick from 25+ yards, creating space and opportunities for teammates even when he misses. That indirect effect is hard to quantify but real.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who has scored more free-kick goals, Messi or Ronaldo?

As of 2024, Lionel Messi has scored approximately 65 free-kick goals in his career, while Cristiano Ronaldo has scored around 60+. The numbers are close, but Messi has a slightly higher total.

What is the success rate for Messi and Ronaldo's free-kicks?

Lionel Messi converts roughly 8-9% of his direct free-kick attempts, while Cristiano Ronaldo converts about 5-6%. This means Messi scores about once every 11 attempts, while Ronaldo scores once every 16-17 attempts.

Which free-kick technique is more effective?

Both techniques can be highly effective. The curl (used by Messi) offers greater consistency and accuracy, while the knuckleball (used by Ronaldo) creates more unpredictable movement but requires perfect execution. Success depends on the specific situation, distance, and the taker's mastery of the technique.

Who is considered the greatest free-kick taker of all time?

Many experts consider Juninho Pernambucano the greatest free-kick taker ever, with over 100 free-kick goals. Among active players, Messi is often ranked highest for his efficiency, though Ronaldo's influence on the technique is unparalleled. The debate remains lively among football analysts.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.