YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
center  college  denver  drafted  european  experience  jokić  league  people  played  player  quietly  second  serbia  thomas  
LATEST POSTS

How Old Was Jokić When He Was Drafted?

Why the 2014 Draft Class Was a Maze of Question Marks

The 2014 NBA Draft wasn’t exactly a golden class. No superstars emerged immediately. Andrew Wiggins went first, Joel Embiid second — both with injury concerns. Jabari Parker third. Dante Exum at five. Yet, by the time the second round rolled around, teams were reaching. Desperate. Picking on hope and highlight reels rather than proof. That’s where Jokić entered: 41st, late second, Serbia, center, modest stats, zero American college exposure. You can see why most franchises passed.

But let’s be clear about this: Jokić wasn’t flying under the radar because he was bad. He played for Mega Basket, a Serbian club known for developing talent (like Nikola Peković). In the 2013–14 Adriatic League, he averaged 11 points, 7 rebounds, over 26 minutes per game. Not eye-popping. But efficient. Smart. You had to watch. You had to understand the rhythm of European ball — the spacing, the pace, the way big men handle the rock. Most scouts didn’t. Or didn’t care.

And that’s where the real disconnect happened. American evaluators still, in 2014, equated dominance with athleticism. Vertical leap. Wingspan. Forty times. Jokić? He looked like he’d rather be fishing. Or napping. His body language screamed indifference. Except when he had the ball. Then — quietly, calmly — he dismantled defenses with bounce passes you don’t see from point guards, let alone 7-foot centers.

What European Scouts Saw That NBA Executives Missed

European basketball isn’t the NBA. It’s slower. More tactical. More patient. A post move here. A screen-and-roll read there. Jokić thrived in that environment — not because he was unstoppable physically, but because he was unpredictable. He’d fake a handoff, then pivot into a turnaround jumper. Or draw three defenders, then thread a no-look pass to the weak-side corner. That kind of IQ doesn’t show up on a combine sheet.

The Denver Nuggets, though? They had a secret weapon: Masai Ujiri, their president at the time, who’d spent years scouting globally. He knew Serbia. He knew Mega Basket. He trusted their reports. And when Jokić’s name popped up at 41, Ujiri didn’t hesitate. Not because he predicted MVPs — who could? — but because the data, the film, the whispers from Belgrade all pointed to something. Maybe not a star. But a rotation big. A project.

How Draft Position Masks Long-Term Potential

Being picked 41st isn’t an insult. It’s a label. “Second-rounder.” “Late pick.” “Depth.” Teams don’t expect you to start. They expect you to ride the bench, maybe get sent to the G-League. But Jokić didn’t go to the G-League. He came over in 2015 and started playing immediately. Why? Injuries. Jusuf Nurkić got traded. The center spot opened. And suddenly, a 20-year-old rookie was running the show.

His first season: 10 points, 7 boards, 2.4 assists per game. Solid. Unspectacular. Then year two: 16-9-4. Year three: 20-10-7. And suddenly, people were asking: “When did he become good?” The answer? He was always good. We just didn’t notice.

Age at Draft: Why 19 Was Actually Perfect

NBA teams love young. Fresh. Moldable. 18-year-old phenoms straight from high school or one-and-done college kids. But Jokić? He was 19 at draft time — not a teenager, not a college vet. A man with two full seasons of pro experience in a competitive league. That’s rare for international picks.

Most European prospects drafted at 18 or 19 haven’t played meaningful minutes. Jokić already had 58 games of Adriatic League play under his belt. He knew how to manage fatigue. How to read defenses. How to handle pressure. He wasn’t raw. He was seasoned — just unknown.

Imagine drafting a player who didn’t need to learn how to set a screen or rotate on defense. Who already understood spacing. Who could pass like a point guard but post up like a traditional center. That’s what Denver got. Not a project. A finished product — wrapped in a sleepy demeanor and a jersey too big for him.

And yet — no one cared. Because he wasn’t from Kentucky. Because he didn’t win a championship. Because he didn’t dominate in a way that fits the American narrative of greatness: dunks, blocks, trash talk. Jokić? He won with quiet precision. With touch. With vision. It was beautiful. Just not loud.

Jokić vs. Other Late-Round Legends: How He Stacks Up

People love comparing late picks who became stars. There’s Manu Ginóbili (57th), Draymond Green (35th), Isaiah Thomas (60th). All defied odds. But Jokić’s path was different. He wasn’t overlooked because of skill. He was overlooked because of context. Ginóbili was in Italy. Green was at Michigan State. Thomas played in the NCAA Tournament. Jokić? He was in Serbia, on a small team, no TV exposure, no analytics love.

Green was 22 at draft time. Older. More polished. But coming off a championship run, he had visibility. Thomas was a scorer — easy to evaluate. Jokić was a center who didn’t run the floor like a guard. Didn’t block shots. Didn’t dunk. He passed. He shot floaters. He played slow.

That said, Jokić’s trajectory is the steepest. From 41st pick to three-time MVP in eight years? Only two players have won three MVPs: Kareem, Russell, Jordan, Magic, Bird, Duncan — and now Jokić. And he did it without ever being the fastest, strongest, or loudest guy on the floor.

The Rarity of a 19-Year-Old International With Pro Experience

Most 19-year-olds in the draft are either high schoolers or college freshmen. Jokić was neither. He was a professional. He’d been paid to play. He’d traveled. Played in front of crowds. Faced veterans. That maturity showed. He didn’t panic as a rookie. Didn’t force shots. Didn’t get rattled by NBA speed.

Compare that to, say, Kristaps Porziņģis — drafted at 20, but with far less pro experience. Or Domantas Sabonis — 19 at draft, but playing in the NCAA. Different game. Different demands. Jokić came in with a different kind of readiness. Not physical. Mental.

Draft Slot vs. Career Trajectory: Does It Even Matter?

People act like draft position predicts success. It doesn’t. Not always. Look at the first overall picks who flopped. Anthony Bennett. Greg Oden. Kwame Brown. Then look at the 60th pick who became a two-way star: Isaiah Thomas. Draft order is a snapshot. A guess. A gamble.

Jokić proves that what matters more is opportunity, fit, and patience. Denver had all three. They didn’t rush him. They let him grow. And when he exploded — 2018, 2019, 2020 — it wasn’t sudden. It was inevitable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was Jokić the Youngest Player in the 2014 Draft?

No. Many players were younger. Jabari Parker was 19. Julius Randle was 19. Even some second-rounders were 18 or 19. Jokić wasn’t young by draft standards. But he was experienced. That’s the key distinction. While others were still in college or high school, he’d already played professionally in a top-tier European league.

Did Jokić Play in the NBA Right After Being Drafted?

No. He stayed in Serbia for one more season. The Nuggets didn’t expect him to be a star. They didn’t need him immediately. So he returned to Mega Basket, played another year, then joined Denver in 2015. That extra season helped. He wasn’t rushed. He wasn’t overwhelmed. He came in ready.

How Did a 41st Pick Become a Three-Time MVP?

Talent, opportunity, and evolution. Jokić didn’t just show up and dominate. He improved every year. His shooting. His passing. His defense. Denver surrounded him with shooters. They gave him the ball. They trusted him. And slowly, quietly, he became the best player in the league — not by jumping the highest, but by thinking the fastest.

The Bottom Line

Nikola Jokić was 19 years old when he was drafted. But age wasn’t the story. Experience was. Vision was. Patience was. The thing is, we still judge players by where they were picked — as if the draft is a ranking, not a flawed, chaotic process shaped by bias, visibility, and timing. Jokić slipped to 41 not because he was bad, but because he didn’t fit the mold.

I find this overrated — the idea that scouts “missed” him. They didn’t miss. They just didn’t value what he offered. Efficiency over explosiveness. IQ over athleticism. And that’s exactly where the system failed. Because greatness doesn’t always announce itself with a dunk. Sometimes, it arrives with a bounce pass from the high post.

We’re far from it if we think we’ve figured out player evaluation. Data is still lacking. Experts disagree. Honestly, it is unclear whether we’ll ever truly predict outliers like Jokić. But one thing’s certain: being 19 and picked 41st didn’t hold him back. It gave him time. Space. And the freedom to become the most unlikely MVP in NBA history.

Suffice to say — next time you see a skinny European center passing from the corners, don’t turn the channel. You might be watching the future. Quietly. Efficiently. One no-look assist at a time.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.