YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
achilles  boogie  capela  cousins  decision  demarcus  golden  injury  lakers  lebron  million  offered  signed  turned  warriors  
LATEST POSTS

Who Turned Down 84 Million From the Lakers? The Shocking Decision That Still Ripples Through the NBA

Let’s be clear about this: professional athletes don’t turn down eight-figure deals unless something deeper is at play. It’s not just about money. It’s about legacy, recovery timelines, team dynamics, and sometimes, pure ego. This wasn’t just a financial gamble—it was a psychological one.

How a Career-Altering Injury Led to the Million Decision

The Moment Everything Changed: The Achilles Tear

In January 2018, DeMarcus Cousins went down. Just like that. No contact. He planted his foot and collapsed. The diagnosis? Ruptured Achilles tendon. Career-threatening. Recovery time: 9 to 12 months. At 27, he was averaging 25.2 points, 12.9 rebounds, and 5.4 assists—prime All-NBA numbers. But in one second, all leverage vanished. The thing is, injury timing in the NBA is everything. If it had happened two months later, he’d have been an unrestricted free agent with a clean bill of health. Instead, he was negotiating from a hospital bed.

And that’s exactly where the Lakers saw an opportunity. They offered $84 million over four years—reasonable for a healthy star, borderline risky for a player facing an uncertain recovery. Cousins could’ve accepted. Signed, rehabbed quietly, collected checks while watching games in a sweat suit. Many would’ve. But he didn’t want charity. He wanted a max deal. Full value. Respect.

Why the Warriors Made More Sense Than the Lakers

So he waited. Rehabbed. Trained. And then, in July 2018, he signed with the Golden State Warriors—for $5.3 million. One-year deal. Minimum salary, really. Why? Because the Warriors already had two of the best centers in the league: Draymond Green and Jordan Bell. But they also had something else: a championship culture. A proven system. And Kevin Durant.

Think about that. He took a 94% pay cut to join a team that had just won 16 of 17 playoff games. A team loaded with Hall of Famers. It was insane. It was genius. Because if he could prove he was still functional—even at 80%—he’d have the NBA at his feet the next summer. The Lakers offered security. The Warriors offered a spotlight. And sometimes, spotlight beats security. Especially when you’re trying to resurrect a reputation.

The Lakers' Pitch: Superteam Dreams That Never Materialized

LeBron’s Arrival and the Chase for a Dynasty

When LeBron James signed with the Lakers in 2018, the franchise smelled blood. They hadn’t made the playoffs since 2013. Kobe’s era was over. The rebuild was stalled. LeBron changed everything. Suddenly, they were a destination again. The front office scrambled to build a contender—fast. They targeted Cousins knowing he could play alongside LeBron, even dominate. They envisioned a frontcourt of LeBron, AD, and Boogie. Scary? Absolutely. But risky? Even more so.

The $84 million offer wasn’t reckless. It was strategic. They believed in the medical reports. They trusted their training staff. And they knew Cousins had the skill set to thrive in a motion-heavy offense. Except—there was no guarantee he’d ever move like he used to. Agility, first-step burst, lateral quickness—gone with the Achilles. And the Lakers were betting on a medical miracle. They weren’t wrong to try. But you can’t outsmart biology.

What the Lakers Gave Up to Make Room

To clear cap space, they let Kentavious Caldwell-Pope walk, declined Luol Deng’s final year (saving $18 million), and moved on from Nick Young. All moves pointing toward a big splash. Cousins would’ve been the final piece—until he wasn’t. And when he chose Golden State, the Lakers pivoted. Eventually landed Anthony Davis in 2019. Won the 2020 title. So, did they dodge a bullet? Maybe. But it’s fair to wonder: what if Cousins had said yes? What if he’d stayed healthy? We’ll never know. But we do know this: that single decision altered two franchises.

Golden State’s Gamble: A Minimum Deal With Maximum Risk

The One-Year, .3 Million Experiment

Golden State didn’t need Cousins. They already had a championship machine. But adding a former All-NBA center recovering from injury? That’s not need. That’s arrogance. Or brilliance. Depends on your view. They signed him knowing he might never play a game. And in the 2019 playoffs, he did—sort of. Averaged 8.7 points in 18 minutes per game. Looked slow. Labored. But he passed well. Made the right reads. And in the Finals against Toronto, he tore his quad. Done for the year. Warriors lost in six.

But here’s the twist: Cousins never got injured again. Not because he healed perfectly—but because he never got the chance to prove it. The Warriors didn’t re-sign him. No other team offered a max deal. He bounced: Houston (4 games), Milwaukee (3 games), Denver (10 games). By 2022, he was in Taiwan. Then Puerto Rico. Now? Coaching in the G League. A fall from grace that still stings.

Why the Risk Didn’t Pay Off for Anyone

For the Warriors, it was a failed experiment. They used a roster spot on a player who never moved like he used to. For Cousins, it was a reputation crash. Scouts now see him as injury-prone, immobile, high-maintenance. For the Lakers, it was a lesson in patience. They got AD. They got the ring. But at what cost? They missed two full seasons of playoff contention chasing that superteam dream.

Cousins vs. Capela: A Tale of Two Centers

Different Paths, Same Position

Compare Cousins to Clint Capela. Both centers. Both dominant rebounders. But Capela never turned down $80 million. In 2020, he signed a 5-year, $90 million deal with Atlanta. Not a max, but secure. He stayed healthy. Averaged 15 boards a game in 2021. Now he’s the anchor of a rebuilding Hawks team. Cousins? Making headlines for coaching high schoolers.

Is it fair? Not really. But the NBA isn’t fair. It’s a business. Capela avoided drama. Played within the system. Cousins? Wanted to be the system. And that changes everything.

Long-Term Earnings: Regret or Redemption?

Over a decade, Cousins earned over $150 million. Capela? Around $110 million. So financially, Boogie came out ahead—except he left $84 million on the table in one offer alone. And now? Capela’s still starting. Cousins isn’t. Earnings mean less when you’re not playing. Legacy matters more than the last paycheck.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did DeMarcus Cousins Ever Regret Turning Down the Lakers?

He never said it outright. But in a 2021 interview, he admitted, “I thought I’d come back stronger. Faster. I didn’t.” That’s as close as it gets. He believed in his body. He believed in his grind. But biology doesn’t care about belief. And honestly, it is unclear if any rehab protocol could’ve restored his explosiveness.

Could the Lakers Have Won Earlier With Cousins?

Possibly. But probably not. The 2018-19 Lakers missed the playoffs with a 37-45 record. Even at full strength, would Cousins have pushed them over? Doubtful. They lacked perimeter defense. Ball movement was stagnant. And LeBron missed 17 games. Adding a slow, post-heavy center might’ve made things worse. The problem is, we’ll never know. But it’s unlikely they’d have won a title in 2019.

Is Million the Largest Offer Ever Declined?

No. Chris Paul turned down a 4-year, $107 million offer from the Hornets in 2011 when he forced a trade to the Lakers (later vetoed). And John Wall walked away from a 4-year, $172 million extension in 2020, betting on health. He never played a game under that new deal. So Boogie’s decision wasn’t unique—but it was among the most consequential.

The Bottom Line: A Self-Bet That Didn’t Land

So who turned down $84 million from the Lakers? DeMarcus Cousins. And while it looked like arrogance at the time, it was something else: hope. He hoped he’d bounce back. He hoped the Warriors would validate his health. He hoped the next contract would be bigger. But hope doesn’t heal tendons.

I find this overrated—blaming him for the decision. He wasn’t being greedy. He was being human. And that’s the thing people don’t think about enough: athletes are people first. They make emotional calls. They trust their gut. Sometimes it backfires. Cousins didn’t lose because he was foolish. He lost because the game is brutal.

Still, a recommendation: if you’re an athlete facing a major injury, take the guaranteed money. Even if it feels low. Because once you’re on the outside looking in, no amount of talent brings you back. The Lakers moved on. The Warriors won without him. And Boogie? He’s still fighting to be relevant. That’s the cost of a single “no.”

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.