YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
bromell  changes  coleman  competition  doping  faster  fastest  kerley  reaction  record  running  seconds  sprint  sprinters  training  
LATEST POSTS

Who Is the Fastest Guy Alive Right Now?

We’ve had nearly a decade and a half of sprinters chasing a standard that feels almost mythic. And yet, someone is always the fastest right now. The thing is, “right now” is slippery. Injuries, doping suspensions, motivation dips, and sheer unpredictability mean the crown changes hands faster than a baton in a relay.

Defining What “Fastest” Actually Means in 2024

Let’s be clear about this: fastest doesn’t always mean the guy with the world record. It often means the one running the fastest times today. Bolt isn’t racing. He retired in 2017. So technically, he’s out of the running—literally. The title today is about who’s stepping on the gas when the lights are brightest.

And that’s where things get murky. The IAAF, now World Athletics, recognizes the 100-meter dash as the definitive measure. Wind-legal times under 2.0 m/s, fully automatic timing, and international competition standards—those are the rules. But even within that framework, people don’t race at the same time. A 9.79 in June might beat a 9.80 in August if the latter was in a weaker meet. Context matters.

Then there’s the indoor vs. outdoor debate. Indoor tracks are shorter, turns tighter. Coleman ran 6.34 seconds in the 60m indoors in 2020—that’s blistering—but it doesn’t count for “fastest man alive” claims. Why? Because the 100m is the gold standard. Always has been. Always will be. (Unless, of course, someone redefines it—which isn’t happening anytime soon.)

World Record vs. Current Form: A Critical Divide

Bolt’s 9.58 still stands. Thirteen years. No one has broken 9.6. Fred Kerley ran 9.76 in 2022. Coleman did it in 2019. Trayvon Bromell dipped to 9.76 in 2021. Solid. Elite. But nowhere near that 9.58. That changes everything. Because fans want spectacle. They want history. And we're far from it.

Yet winning races today isn’t about rewriting history. It’s about consistency, reaction time, lane draw, and not pulling a hamstring at the wrong moment. The men running sub-9.8 now are doing something remarkable, just not that remarkable.

Why the Title Is More Psychological Than Chronological

You ever notice how people keep saying “the next Bolt” like it’s a job posting? It’s not. Bolt was 6'5". Most sprinters are compact. He had stride length like a gazelle on a treadmill. His top speed in Berlin 2009? 44.72 km/h (27.8 mph). That’s car-in-a-school-zone fast. No one since has matched it. Not close.

So when we crown someone “fastest man alive,” we’re really saying: “He’s the best we’ve got at this moment.” It’s less about legacy, more about momentum. And momentum shifts fast.

The Top Contenders in the Post-Bolt Era (2020–2024)

Fred Kerley. Noah Lyles. Christian Coleman. Trayvon Bromell. Zharnel Hughes. Lets go one by one—because the field is thinner than it looks.

Kerley ran 9.76 in 2022 at the World Championships. That’s tied for third-fastest ever by an American. He’s built like a linebacker who decided to try track on a whim. Powerful. Explosive. But his 200m is stronger. He’s not a pure 100m assassin. And honestly, it is unclear if he can replicate that time consistently.

Coleman—9.76 in 2019, world champ in 2019, then a doping ban wiped out 2020 and 2021. He came back fast. But not Bolt-fast. His starts are robotic. Clean. Precise. Yet he’s brittle. Missed the 2023 Worlds with injury. That changes everything when you’re racing ghosts.

Bromell? He’s the comeback king. Tore his Achilles in 2016. Spent years rehabbing. In 2021, he ran 9.76—same time, same year as Kerley. But he faded. Now he’s inconsistent. Fast, yes. Dominant? We’re far from it.

Lyles is more 200m/400m. His 100m best is 9.86. Solid. But not world-leading. Hughes? British. Ran 9.83 in 2023. But false-started in the World final. Nerves. Always nerves.

And then there’s the dark horse: Oblique Seville. Jamaican. Ran 9.82 in 2023. Young. Raw. Potential? Sky-high. Experience? Lacking. Time will tell. But potential doesn’t win gold.

How Reaction Time and Technique Outweigh Raw Speed

You can’t just be fast. You have to start fast. The average reaction time off the blocks for elite sprinters is between 0.12 and 0.15 seconds. Any faster? False start. Too slow? You’re digging out of a hole. Coleman’s reaction time in his 9.76 race? 0.131 seconds. Cold. Mechanical. That’s where technique beats pure sprint velocity in the first 30 meters.

Top speed usually hits around 50–60 meters. Then it’s about deceleration control. The best sprinters lose the least speed at the end. Bolt lost only 1.5% from his peak in 2009. Most lose 3–5%. That’s the difference between first and fourth.

The Role of Training, Tech, and Track Surfaces

Modern tracks are faster. Those rubberized surfaces—like Mondotrack FS—reduce energy loss. Shoes? Nike’s ZoomX Dragonfly? Carbon-plated. Lightweight. Explosive response. They’re basically sprinting trampolines. And that’s exactly where technology starts blurring the lines between human and engineered performance.

Training has evolved too. GPS vests, force plates, AI-driven biomechanics. Sprinters now know their stride angles to the decimal. Recovery? Cryotherapy, red light therapy, hyperbaric chambers. It’s a science park disguised as track practice.

Kerley vs. Coleman vs. Bromell: Who Holds the Edge in 2024?

Let’s compare. Coleman: best raw speed out of the blocks. Kerley: best top-end power. Bromell: best story, but not the best times anymore. In head-to-head races, Kerley beat Coleman in the 2022 US Trials. Coleman false-started. Nerves again. That changes everything.

But because Kerley skipped the 100m at the 2023 Worlds to focus on the 200m, the door opened. Noah Lyles won. But his 9.83 wasn’t dominant. Hughes pushed him hard. And Seville was right there. So the hierarchy? It’s fluid. No clear king.

And because Bolt never had real competition in his prime—Blake, Gatlin, Powell were fast, but not there—today’s field is actually deeper. Just not faster. Irony, huh?

To give a sense of scale: if Bolt ran his 9.58 today, he’d win by over half a meter. That’s three strides. Unthinkable.

Performance Trends: Are We Getting Faster or Stuck?

Since 2008, the top 10 100m times have hovered between 9.63 and 9.80. No breakthrough. No outlier besides Bolt. In fact, the average top-10 time has slowed slightly since 2012. That’s not encouraging. Genetics? Training plateaus? Doping controls tightening? Experts disagree.

Some argue we’re hitting biological limits. 9.5 seconds might be the human floor. Others say we haven’t seen the perfect storm: ideal genetics, perfect training, flawless execution, no wind limit. Yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Usain Bolt Still the Fastest Man Alive?

No—because he’s retired. But yes—because his record stands. It’s a paradox. He’s the fastest who ever lived, but not the fastest right now. That changes everything about how we define the title. Legacy versus present dominance. You can’t have both.

Has Anyone Come Close to Breaking Bolt’s 9.58?

Not really. Tyson Gay and Yohan Blake both ran 9.69. Asafa Powell hit 9.72. But after Bolt’s 9.58, the gap to second place is 0.10 seconds. In sprinting, that’s an eternity. The next five fastest times are all over 9.76. The problem is, we’re not seeing faster runners—we’re seeing better-timed ones.

Why Don’t Sprinters Focus More on the 150m or 250m?

Because they’re not Olympic events. No medals. No records. No sponsorships. The 100m is iconic. The 200m is artistic. The 150m? It’s a novelty race. Even though Bolt’s 150m dash in 2009 was faster per meter than his 100m, it doesn’t count. Which explains why no one trains for it seriously.

The Bottom Line

So who is the fastest guy alive right now? The answer isn’t Bolt. It’s not even settled among the active runners. But if we go by last performance at major championship level, Fred Kerley has the strongest claim—provided Coleman doesn’t return fully fit in 2024. Coleman’s 9.76 still stands as the fastest time in the post-Bolt world, but Kerley ran it more recently under pressure.

I find this overrated—the constant search for “the next Bolt.” It’s like waiting for another Beatles. It’s not going to happen. We should appreciate what we have: a deep, competitive field, even if it’s not breaking records.

And that’s exactly where nuance matters. Speed isn’t just time. It’s timing. Health. Mental grit. The guy who wins isn’t always the fastest on paper. He’s the one who doesn’t blink when it counts.

My personal recommendation? Watch Oblique Seville. He’s young. He’s fast. He’s Jamaican—sprint factory legacy. If he stays healthy, 2025 could be his breakout. But until then, the title is more about availability than supremacy.

Because here’s the truth: the fastest man alive might not even have raced yet. He could be in Kingston, training barefoot on a high school track. Or in Texas, overlooked in a junior college meet. Records don’t come from expectations. They come from surprises.

And isn’t that exactly why we watch?

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.