YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
career  defenseman  frequently  gordie  gretzky  history  hockey  modern  offensive  physical  player  points  remains  reverence  ultimate  
LATEST POSTS

Who does Wayne Gretzky think is the best player ever? Unveiling the Great One’s ultimate hockey choice

Who does Wayne Gretzky think is the best player ever? Unveiling the Great One’s ultimate hockey choice

---

Decoding the Great One’s reverence for Mr. Hockey

To truly comprehend why the most prolific scorer in NHL history defers to another, you have to look past the raw numbers. The thing is, Gretzky grew up during an era where Gordie Howe was not just a superstar; he was an absolute institution. For a young kid from Brantford, Ontario, watching No. 9 dominate the ice with the Detroit Red Wings created a permanent psychological blueprint of what a hockey god looked like.

The childhood connection that shaped a legend

People don't think about this enough, but personal relationships profoundly warp our objective sports debates. Gretzky first met Howe at the tender age of ten, a momentous encounter captured in an iconic photograph where a smiling Howe hooks a stick around the youngster's neck. That changes everything. When you spend your formative years idolizing a man who later becomes your peer and mentor, separation between the myth and the man becomes entirely impossible. It is a level of deep-seated respect that purely digital fans, raised entirely on YouTube highlights and advanced analytics spreadsheets, will never fully grasp.

A shared stage in the World Hockey Association

Where it gets tricky is the brief, surreal overlap of their professional careers. In 1978, a teenage Gretzky entered the World Hockey Association with the Indianapolis Racers before quickly moving to the Edmonton Oilers. Howe, remarkably, was still active, skating alongside his sons for the New England Whalers. They shared ice. They played in the same All-Star game. Experiencing Howe’s legendary physical strength firsthand solidified Gretzky's belief that nobody could ever match the total package of intimidation, skill, and longevity that defined the Detroit icon.

---

The statistical paradox of the hockey GOAT debate

If you put the career stat sheets side by side, Gretzky’s argument for Howe starts to look like a beautiful piece of romantic fiction. But hockey excellence cannot be measured solely by blinking red lights behind the glass. Experts disagree vehemently on how to weigh total points against physical presence, yet Gretzky remains entirely unbothered by his own overwhelming statistical superiority over his childhood idol.

Breaking down the unfathomable point differential

Let us look at the cold, hard data from the National Hockey League record books. Wayne Gretzky retired with a mind-numbing 2,857 career points, a number so utterly absurd that even if he had never scored a single goal, his 1,963 assists would still make him the all-time leading scorer. Gordie Howe sits fourth on that same list with 1,850 points. The gap is a massive 1,007 points. Does that make Wayne better? Not in his mind. Gretzky has noted on multiple occasions that the wide-open, high-scoring environment of the 1980s artificially inflated his offensive totals compared to the clutching, grabbing, low-scoring eras Howe endured during the 1950s and 1960s.

The ultimate test of professional longevity

Except that Howe possesses one record that even Gretzky could not touch: an unassailable timeline of elite performance. Howe played an unbelievable 26 seasons in the NHL and another six in the WHA, finally hanging up his skates at age 52 after a final 80-game campaign with the Hartford Whalers in 1980. Think about that for a second. Gretzky walked away from the game at age 38, battered by chronic back issues and the grueling wear and tear of a fast-paced league. Howe’s ability to remain effective, terrifying, and productive across five distinct decades is a feat of human engineering that we are far from seeing ever again in modern professional sports.

---

The dual monarchy: Why Bobby Orr shares the crown

While Howe holds the emotional deed to Gretzky's hockey heart, another name constantly interrupts his solo praise. Whenever the Great One is pressed on a podcast or during a casual television broadcast, he inevitably turns the conversation into a two-man race. Bobby Orr is the second pillar of Gretzky's personal pantheon.

Redefining the mechanics of a defenseman

Before Orr arrived in Boston in 1966, defensemen were essentially stay-at-home guards whose sole purpose was to clear the crease and launch desperate clearing passes off the glass. Orr shattered that paradigm completely. He flew. He orchestrated the rush from behind his own net, combining unmatched skating edge-work with an elite offensive brain. As a result: Orr remains the only defenseman in NHL history to win the league scoring title, capturing the Art Ross Trophy twice in 1970 and 1975. Gretzky viewed Orr not just as a great player, but as a total evolutionary leap forward for the entire sport.

The tragedy of a shortened prime

But the issue remains that Orr's brilliance was a meteor streaking through the night sky, brilliant but devastatingly brief. Cruel knee injuries cut his career short, limiting him to just 657 regular-season games before forced retirement claimed him at age 30. How do you compare 26 years of Howe to a mere decade of Orr? Honestly, it's unclear. Yet Gretzky judges peak performance just as highly as cumulative totals. In his view, the absolute highest level of hockey ever executed on a sheet of ice occurred when No. 4 was patrolling the blue line for the Bruins, a peak so high it transcends the need for a twenty-year career footprint.

---

How modern generational talents alter the equation

The conversation around who Wayne Gretzky thinks is the best player ever cannot remain entirely trapped in a black-and-white film archive. The sport has evolved dramatically since the days of wooden sticks and heavy brown leather pads. Today, a new breed of athlete is forcing the hockey world—including the Great One himself—to reconsider the absolute limits of human skill on ice.

The terrifying velocity of Connor McDavid

Enter the modern savior of the Edmonton franchise, Connor McDavid. Watching McDavid slice through a neutral zone trap at over 25 miles per hour while seamlessly handling a puck makes the old legends look like they were skating through wet cement. Gretzky has been highly vocal in his praise of the Oilers captain, routinely stating that McDavid operates at a speed-of-thought level that simply did not exist in previous generations. In short, McDavid represents the ultimate refinement of the hockey athlete, a freakish combination of Orr’s skating and Gretzky’s own legendary vision. But does Gretzky rank him above Howe yet? No, because eras cannot be easily bridged, and titles must be sustained over decades.

Common mistakes/misconceptions

The obsession with individual modern analytics

People consistently look at contemporary spreadsheet metrics and assume they can untangle the subjective opinions of hockey legends through modern mathematics. The problem is that cross-era point comparisons fail to account for how the game was actually taught and played before the turn of the century. Analysts frequently strip away context, arguing that modern training would neutralize historical dominance, yet they ignore that Gretzky evaluated greatness through the lens of direct impact on the ice. Let's be clear: a player's Corsi percentage from 2024 cannot accurately measure how a defenseman from 1970 revolutionized the transition game.

Confusing personal humility with objective evaluation

Fans often assume that because number 99 deflects praise, his selections are merely acts of polite diplomacy rather than calculated, expert assessments. Except that Gretzky genuinely viewed the sport through an artistic framework where physical dominance was secondary to sheer anticipation and vision. When he speaks about his idols, people mistake his deferential Canadian charm for a lack of analytical conviction. He is not just being nice; his choices reflect a specific philosophy that values spatial awareness above raw physical output.

Little-known aspect or expert advice

The psychological weight of the backyard rink heritage

To truly comprehend who does Wayne Gretzky think is the best player ever, you have to peer deeply into the specific, localized subculture of Canadian hockey development. His evaluation criteria were forged in the freezing pre-dawn hours on Walter Gretzky’s legendary backyard ice in Brantford, Ontario. This specific upbringing taught him to view hockey as a game of spatial geometry rather than a series of heavy collisions. Consequently, his ultimate respect is reserved for athletes who manipulated space like chess grandmasters.

The ultimate endorsement of defensive revolution

His highest praise bypasses goal-scoring completely, which explains why he routinely points to a defenseman as the ultimate baseline for hockey perfection. It is an ironic twist that the sport's most explosive offensive weapon believes the ultimate player was someone whose primary job description was preventing goals. If you want to evaluate hockey talent like the greatest scorer in history, you must abandon the highlight reels of spectacular goals. You must look instead at how a single individual could dictate the tempo of an entire game from their own defensive zone.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Wayne Gretzky ever select Mario Lemieux as the greatest of all time?

Gretzky has openly stated that Lemieux was a superior pure goal scorer, but he traditionally ranks him just outside his absolute top spot due to his historical reverence for an earlier generation. Lemieux carried an astronomical 1.88 points-per-game average through his career, a staggering feat considering his severe health battles and bouts with Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Great One heavily recognized this efficiency, frequently noting that a fully healthy Lemieux would have easily smashed through the 2,000-point milestone. Yet, when forced to declare a singular king of the sport, he consistently pivots his answer toward the icons who built the framework of modern hockey.

Why does Gretzky frequently name Gordie Howe instead of himself?

The issue remains that Gretzky was raised in an era where Howe was considered the literal embodiment of the sport, holding records like 801 NHL regular-season goals before number 99 shattered them. He views Howe not just as a statistical titan, but as a childhood hero who combined terrifying physical toughness with refined offensive longevity across five separate decades. Because Gretzky possessed a famously slight frame of 185 pounds, he harbored a deep, lifelong reverence for Howe’s ability to dominate the game through sheer physical intimidation and elite skill. For Gretzky, self-proclamation is an impossibility, making his deference to Mr. Hockey a natural extension of his deep respect for the sport's history.

What specific attributes made Bobby Orr the top choice in Gretzky's eyes?

During a detailed interview on the New Heights podcast, Gretzky explicitly named Bobby Orr alongside Howe as the two greatest hockey players to ever lace up skates. Orr remains the only defenseman in NHL history to win the league scoring title, capturing the Art Ross Trophy twice with a mind-boggling peak of 139 assists in a single season. Gretzky has noted that Orr completely redefined how the position was played, changing the sport's tactical evolution by turning defense into an immediate offensive rush. As a result: Gretzky values the total structural transformation of the game over simple career point accumulation.

Engaged synthesis

Evaluating who does Wayne Gretzky think is the best player ever requires us to look past our own modern obsession with consensus GOAT debates. We have to accept that the greatest playmaker in history evaluates the sport through a unique lens of historical reverence, stylistic evolution, and pure spatial intelligence. By crowning Bobby Orr and Gordie Howe as the true pinnacles of hockey achievement, Gretzky is making a deliberate, bold statement that greatness cannot be reduced to a digitized leaderboard. It is a philosophy that prioritizes how a player transformed the actual mechanics of the sport over how many trophies sit in their personal showcase. We should stop trying to correct his list with modern analytics and instead appreciate the deep wisdom of a man who saw the game three steps ahead of everyone else.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.