YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
concussion  concussions  concussive  defensive  football  frequency  impact  impacts  kickers  players  position  positions  punters  response  safety  
LATEST POSTS

What football position gets the least concussions?

Decoding Gridiron Safety: What Football Position Gets the Least Concussions?

American football has long faced intense scrutiny regarding player safety, with head injuries and concussions remaining at the forefront of medical research and sports journalism. When fans and analysts debate the dangers of the gridiron, the conversation usually gravitates toward the terrifying high-speed collisions experienced by wide receivers going across the middle, the bone-crushing tackles absorbed by running backs, or the blindside pass-rush pressures endured by quarterbacks. However, behind the weekly highlight reels lies a complex biomechanical reality. When analyzing data from youth leagues all the way up to the professional ranks, a nuanced question emerges: What football position actually gets the least concussions?

Answering this requires looking beyond a simple tally of reported head traumas. Researchers must weigh impact frequency against impact magnitude, player positioning, and rule changes designed to protect vulnerable athletes. While no position on a football field is entirely immune to head trauma, data consistently points toward specialists—specifically kickers and punters—as experiencing the lowest overall frequency of diagnosed concussions.

The Anatomy of Football Impacts: Speed, Mass, and Momentum

To understand why certain positions experience fewer concussions, we must first break down how head injuries occur on the gridiron. Biomechanically, a concussion is caused by a direct blow to the head, face, neck, or elsewhere on the body with an "impulsive" force transmitted to the head. This rapid acceleration and deceleration of the brain inside the skull causes micro-structural damage to neurons.

Football researchers generally categorize player positions into distinct profiles based on how they encounter force:

  • High-Magnitude, Low-Frequency Positions: Players like quarterbacks, wide receivers, and defensive backs often build up immense linear and rotational momentum in open space. When they collide, the intensity of the hit is severe, but these occurrences are sporadic compared to trench play.

  • Mid-Range Hybrid Positions: Running backs, linebackers, and tight ends experience regular, highly physical contact multiple times per play, balancing frequency with high impact forces.

  • Low-Magnitude, High-Frequency Positions: Offensive and defensive linemen collide on virtually every single snap. While individual hits might feature lower peak linear acceleration than an open-field safety blitz, the cumulative toll of sub-concussive impacts is remarkably high.

Completely outside these traditional groupings are specialists: kickers, punters, and long snappers. Because of their specialized roles and specific rule protections, they operate under an entirely different risk matrix.

The Specialists: Why Kickers and Punters Stand Apart

When evaluating raw injury reports and epidemiological studies from organizations like the National Football League (NFL) and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), kickers and punters consistently register the lowest raw counts and lowest yearly averages for diagnosed concussions.

The reasons for this are rooted in both the rules of the game and the nature of their jobs:

  1. Limited Exposure to Dense Traffic: Unlike a running back who must plunge into a mass of 300-pound linemen, or a wide receiver navigating a zone defense, kickers and punters spend the vast majority of a game standing safely on the sidelines. During actual play, their window of action is brief, isolated, and usually occurs in open space.

  2. Defensive Rule Protections: Over the last decade, football governing bodies have heavily penalized roughing or running into the kicker/punter. Defenders are heavily discouraged from diving at their legs or initiating high-impact helmet contact. These stringent protective rules drastically reduce the incentive and frequency of dangerous blows.

  3. Open-Field TACKLING Dynamics: When a kicker or punter is forced to make a tackle during a return, it is typically a desperate, open-field tracking angle rather than a head-on collision. While these can occasionally result in a heavy hit (such as a kicker attempting to stop a runaway kick returner), the statistical probability of these events happening over a 16-game season is exceptionally low.

Harvard's Center for Health That Matters notes that historical data tracking former professional players highlights kickers, punters, and even quarterbacks as having the lowest symptom metrics per year compared to high-impact positions like linebackers and defensive backs.

The Catch: Sub-Concussive vs. Concussive Realities

While kickers and punters win the category for least concussions, sports scientists urge caution when interpreting "safety" on the football field. Concussions are only the visible tip of the iceberg.

For instance, offensive linemen may not lead the league in acute, game-stopping concussions compared to open-field players, but they endure thousands of sub-concussive head impacts over a career. Conversely, kickers experience virtually none of these routine trench collisions. Therefore, for a kicker or punter, a low concussion count genuinely mirrors a low overall burden of linear and rotational head acceleration throughout their career. They trade the chaotic warfare of the line of scrimmage for calculated, intermittent athletic bursts.

Conclusion: The Safest Role on the Field

If the core objective is minimizing the risk of acute traumatic brain injury and diagnosed concussions, the data crowns the kicker and the punter as the positions least affected. Protected by specialized rules, limited snap counts, and isolation from the chaotic mass collisions of the line of scrimmage, these specialists occupy the statistical outlier of gridiron safety. However, as the sport continues to evolve with better helmet technology and stricter officiating, understanding these positional disparities remains vital to protecting players at every level of the game.

What measures do you think football leagues should prioritize next to further reduce concussion rates across all positions?

Special Teams Influence and Strategic Risk Factors

When evaluating structural vulnerability across the gridiron, special teams play a uniquely dangerous role, particularly for positions usually insulated from regular scrimmage trauma. Kickers and punters generally experience minimal helmet-to-helmet contact during standard offensive or defensive series. However, open-field tackles, coverage blocks, and occasional trick plays thrust these specialists into high-velocity collisions that dramatically elevate their exposure profile relative to their base play-time (Harvard Medical School, 2019).

Conversely, players who specialize strictly as holding or kicking experts outside of these rare defensive obligations maintain the lowest baseline concussion metrics in professional and collegiate leagues (Dai et al., 2018). Their limited physical engagement windows effectively isolate them from the cumulative sub-concussive impacts suffered continuously by line-of-scrimmage players or the devastating open-field hits absorbed by secondary defenders.

The Sub-Concussive Reality: Linemen vs. Skill Positions

While the primary clinical focus often centers on diagnosed concussions, sports medicine researchers increasingly emphasize sub-concussive impacts—hits that do not trigger acute clinical symptoms but accumulate over time.

  • Offensive and Defensive Linemen: These players experience contact on virtually every single snap, characterized by repeated, lower-magnitude linear and rotational accelerations (Baugh et al., 2015).

  • Speed Positions (Cornerbacks, Wide Receivers): These positions register fewer total impacts, but the collisions happen at high velocities, yielding a higher rate of acute, diagnosed concussions (Dai et al., 2018).

This distinction creates a complex risk dichotomy. While kickers and punters experience the absolute least amount of concussion trauma due to minimal contact exposure, linemen trade acute concussion frequency for high-density, sub-concussive repetition.

Modern Protective Adjustments and Rule Modifications

Governing bodies have continually altered rules to protect vulnerable positions. The implementation of strict defenseless-receiver rules, the prohibition of leading with the helmet, and the evolution of position-specific helmet engineering (such as positional helmet testing standards introduced by the NFL and NFLPA) have collectively transformed player safety.

Kickers, punters, and quarterbacks continue to benefit disproportionately from strict roughing-the-passer and roughing-the-kicker penalties. These regulatory frameworks actively deter defenders from launching high-speed impacts into players who are in defenseless passing or kicking postures.

Conclusion: The Ultimate Answer

Ultimately, empirical data confirms that kickers and punters secure the title of the football positions that get the least concussions. Because their roles isolate them from routine blocking, tackling, and line-of-scrimmage trenches, their overall exposure to high-velocity head trauma remains drastically lower than that of cornerbacks, wide receivers, linebackers, and running backs (Harvard Medical School, 2019; Dai et al., 2018). While no position in American football is entirely devoid of risk, the tactical design of kicking duties inherently shields these athletes from the sport's most severe kinetic forces.

References

Baugh, C. M., Kiernan, P. T., Kroshus, E., Daneshvar, D. H., Montenigro, P. H., McKee, A. C., & Stern, R. A. (2015). Frequency of head-impact-related outcomes by position in NCAA Division I collegiate football players. Journal of Neurotrauma, 32(5), 314–326. Cited by: 214

Dai, J. B., Li, A. Y., Haider, S. F., Tomaselli, R., Gometz, A., Sobotka, S., Post, A. F., Adams, R., Maniya, A. Y., Lau, G. K., Kaye-Kauderer, H. P., Lovell, M. R., & Choudhri, T. F. (2018). Effects of game characteristics and player positions on concussion incidence and severity in professional football. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 6(12), 232596711881544. Cited by: 35

Harvard Medical School. (2019). Number of years in NFL, certain positions portend greater risk for cognitive, mental health problems in former players. Football Players Health Study at Harvard.

What specific safety equipment advancements do you think will impact these position-based concussion rates the most in future seasons?

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.