YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
chicago  decades  football  hatred  history  massive  modern  packers  professional  remains  rivalries  rivalry  season  single  stadium  
LATEST POSTS

Which two NFL teams hate each other? The definitive blood feud of American football

Which two NFL teams hate each other? The definitive blood feud of American football

The anatomy of gridiron hatred: defining the NFL’s ultimate border war

People don't think about this enough, but true sports hatred requires proximity, antiquity, and structural parity. Look at the map. The two cities sit less than 210 miles apart, separated by a shifting state line and a massive body of freezing water. This geographic intimacy means that fans don't just see each other on television; they sit in adjacent cubicles, marry into each other's families, and argue over tap beer at roadside taverns along Interstate 94. It is claustrophobic.

The deep-rooted sociology of the midwest divide

Where it gets tricky is the cultural dissonance between the two fan bases. Chicago represents the massive, sprawling metropolis—the Broad Shoulders of the midwest, decorated with skyscrapers, deep-dish pizza, and an inherent urban swagger. Green Bay, conversely, is an anomaly, a tiny, freezing paper-mill town of around 100,000 residents where the franchise is literally owned by the community itself. That changes everything. The Packers are the only public, non-profit major professional sports team in America, making their survival against a giant like Chicago feel like an ongoing, multi-generational miracle to their shareholders.

Why corporate expansion cannot manufacture this animosity

You cannot buy this kind of malice with marketing dollars or modern stadium amenities. While newer franchises manufacture artificial rivalries through slick social media campaigns and primetime scheduling, the Bears and Packers built theirs on the concrete floors of old Wrigley Field and the frozen turf of Lambeau. The issue remains that modern NFL rivalries are fleeting, dissolving the moment a star quarterback gets traded or a head coach is fired. Here, the hatred outlives the personnel; it is a permanent fixture of local infrastructure, passed down like real estate or genetic traits.

The historical framework: how 213 meetings shaped the shield

To really understand how we arrived at this level of mutual loathing, you have to look at the cold, hard numbers that underpin the relationship. As of January 2026, these two franchises have smashed into each other a staggering 213 times across more than ten decades of competition. No other pairing in the history of the National Football League has shared a field that many times. It is the definitive foundational text of pro football.

The dawn of the feud in the roaring twenties

The whole thing ignited on November 27, 1921, back when the Bears were still masquerading as the Chicago Staleys. Chicago blanked the upstart Packers 20-0 in that inaugural matchup, establishing a template of physical dominance that would characterize the early decades of the series. But the real tone was set three years later in 1924, when Chicago’s Frank Hanny and Green Bay’s Tillie Voss exchanged a series of colorful words before launching fists at each other’s helmets. They became the first two players ever ejected for fighting in an NFL game. That was the exact moment the league realized this wasn't just a game—it was a public safety hazard.

The era of administrative dominance and hall of fame hoarding

Between 1929 and 1946, the road to the NFL championship was essentially a private toll road controlled by these two locker rooms, with Green Bay or Chicago claiming 12 of those 17 league titles. That structural dominance cemented their status as the twin pillars of the sport. The competitive excellence has been so sustained that the two organizations combined have sent 77 inductees to the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio—Chicago claiming 41 and Green Bay boasting 36. It is a staggering concentration of football nobility, all concentrated within a three-hour driving radius.

The modern era: from Rodgers' arrogance to the Williams resurgence

For a long time, the rivalry suffered from a severe imbalance of power that threatened to turn a legendary feud into a monotonous chore. Between 1992 and 2024, Green Bay enjoyed an unprecedented run of stability behind two back-to-back Hall of Fame quarterbacks, Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers, who systematically dismantled Chicago's defense for over three decades. The absolute nadir for Illinois football fans occurred when Rodgers screamed "I still own you!" into the Soldier Field bleachers after a rushing touchdown. Yet, things have tilted dramatically on their axis quite recently.

The 2025-2026 wild card explosion and the turning tide

The narrative shifted completely on January 10, 2026, when the teams collided in a highly anticipated NFC Wild Card playoff game. Green Bay appeared to have the contest entirely under control, holding a commanding 21-3 lead at the intermission and maintaining a comfortable advantage late into the third frame. Then, the unthinkable happened. Chicago, led by rookie sensation Caleb Williams, erupted for 25 points in the fourth quarter, clawing their way to a cinematic 31-27 comeback victory that shook the foundations of the midwest. The thing is, the win didn't just advance Chicago in the postseason; it shattered a psychological hex that had loomed over the city for a generation. In the ecstatic locker room afterward, Bears coach Ben Johnson delivered an explicit, fiery speech that instantly went viral, renewing the public hostility between the two fanbases with a single microphone stroke.

The statistical reality of a dead-even marathon

Even with Green Bay holding the narrow historical edge at 109-98-6, the rivalry remains remarkably tight when you look at the macro view over a century of football. The Packers managed to seize the all-time regular-season wins record from Chicago during the 2022 season, a crown the Bears had held since the Great Depression. Currently, Green Bay sits at 856 total franchise victories while Chicago chases close behind with 828. Honestly, it's unclear if any other sports rivalry in the world can match that kind of prolonged, neck-and-neck marathon over such a massive sample size.

Why other classic NFL rivalries fall short of this standard

I know what you are thinking: what about Dallas and Philadelphia, or the absolute slugfests between Baltimore and Pittsburgh? Those are exceptional, violent football games, yes. But they lack the architectural history that constructed the league itself. The Ravens and Steelers, for instance, didn't even exist as a pairing until the late 1990s; their hatred is intense, but it is a modern construct built on television ratings and specific defensive schemes.

The corporate nature of the modern NFC East

The NFC East rivalries are notorious for their toxic internet culture and stadium parking lot brawls, but they lack the pure local purity found in the North. When the Giants play the Cowboys, it feels like a television show produced for a national audience, complete with celebrity sightings and corporate sponsorships. Packers-Bears feels like an old family argument that takes place in a blizzard. It is a relic of an older, grittier America that somehow managed to survive the hyper-commercialization of modern sports, which explains why a freezing afternoon game at Soldier Field still carries more weight than a primetime game in a billion-dollar Texas dome.

Common mistakes when looking at which two NFL teams hate each other

The recency bias trap

People love Recency. They watch a single playoff game exploding with personal fouls and instantly declare a permanent blood feud. It is a massive blunder. You see fans crowning the Kansas City Chiefs and Buffalo Bills as the ultimate modern rivalry just because Patrick Mahomes and Josh Allen trade blows in January. The problem is, that is not real hatred. True animosity requires decades of mutual misery, broken bones, and stolen divisional titles. When asking which two NFL teams hate each other, you cannot just look at the current television ratings or who won the Super Bowl last winter. It requires deep, historical scars.

Confusing proximity with genuine malice

Geographic closeness fools everyone. Why do people assume the New York Giants and New York Jets harbor a burning, visceral rage? Except that they barely play each other. They share a stadium, sure, but they inhabit entirely different conferences, meaning they square off roughly once every four years. A true NFL gridiron feud requires high stakes and repetitive, grueling contact. If you do not play twice a year every single autumn, the anger simply evaporates into the ether. Proximity creates a polite neighborhood rivalry, nothing more.

The media narrative fabrication

Television networks need eyeballs. To get them, commentators invent drama where only mild dislike exists. They will take a single post-game comment from a disgruntled wide receiver and spin it into a season-long war. Let's be clear: a couple of players trading petty insults on social media does not constitute a historic franchise war. True organizational disdain exists at the executive level, in the locker rooms, and deep within the fan bases simultaneously.

The corporate transformation of modern gridiron feuds

How salary caps killed the locker room vendetta

The issue remains that modern professional football is a business first. Decades ago, players stayed with one franchise for their entire careers, allowing genuine, deep-seated hatred to fester over ten or twelve seasons. Today, free agency shatters that continuity completely. A linebacker might spend three years terrorizing a quarterback in the NFC North, only to sign a massive contract with that exact same organization the following spring. How can players maintain a blood feud when their current bitter enemy might become the person helping them secure a playoff bonus next September?

The coaching tree dilution effect

Coaching staffs have become completely intertwined. Because head coaches constantly hire assistants from rival organizations, the tactical secrets and organizational cultures blend together. It softens the edges of historical animosity. Can you truly despise an opponent when their offensive coordinator spent the last five seasons drinking coffee in your own film rooms? (Probably not, unless the departure involved a messy contractual lawsuit). This interconnectedness shifts the burden of maintaining the hatred entirely onto the shoulders of the ticket-holding fan bases.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which two NFL teams hate each other with the longest history?

The historical crown belongs exclusively to the Green Bay Packers and the Chicago Bears. These two foundational franchises have clashed an astonishing 208 times since their inaugural meeting in 1921, establishing a century-long war of attrition. Green Bay currently holds a narrow lead in the all-time series with 107 victories compared to Chicago's 95 wins, alongside 6 ties. This particular rivalry thrives because it survived the pre-merger era of professional football, outlasted multiple stadium movements, and weathered radical structural realignments of the league. It remains the absolute definitive answer for traditionalists examining which two NFL teams hate each other.

Does the rivalry between the Ravens and Steelers still hold up today?

Yes, because the physical blueprint established during the AFC North battles of the late 1990s and 2000s remains firmly embedded in both organizations' cultures. Unlike other matchups that soften over time, Baltimore and Pittsburgh consistently draft players specifically designed to withstand the brutal, low-scoring physical punishment that defines their biannual meetings. Statistics show that over sixty percent of their games since the year 2000 have been decided by a single scoring possession. Did anyone actually believe that shifting personnel would dilute this specific rivalry? The coaches change and the quarterbacks age, yet the fundamental organizational identity of both franchises demands absolute dominance over the other.

Which divisional rivalry produces the highest number of stadium arrests?

The terrifyingly intense matchups between the Philadelphia Eagles and the Dallas Cowboys consistently rank at the top for fan volatility and security interventions. This NFC East clash transcends standard athletic competition, frequently resulting in triple-digit stadium ejections and local police citations during their prime-time encounters. Philadelphia famously operated an active courtroom inside their old stadium to process unruly fans on game day, a testament to the chaotic energy this specific pairing generates. When assessing which two NFL teams hate each other from a purely fan-driven, hostile perspective, the Dallas and Philadelphia dynamic creates an unmatched level of cultural tribalism.

The final verdict on football animosity

We must stop pretending that all football rivalries are created equal. The modern NFL wants you to believe every single Thursday night game is a historic grudge match, but true, unadulterated hatred cannot be manufactured by a marketing department. The crown for the absolute most toxic, enduring, and competitive hatred belongs strictly to the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Baltimore Ravens. This is not some ancient history lesson involving leather helmets, nor is it a temporary media creation driven by a couple of flashy quarterbacks. It is a relentless, annual car crash that has dictated the defensive identity of modern professional football for three decades. If you want to witness the exact point where athletic competition devolves into genuine, organized malice, that is the only game that matters.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.