YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
benefit  financial  flexibility  growth  insurance  investment  market  payments  policy  potential  premium  premiums  returns  stocks  subaccounts  
LATEST POSTS

Can You Lose Money in a VUL? The Truth About Variable Universal Life Insurance

Can You Lose Money in a VUL? The Truth About Variable Universal Life Insurance

How VULs Work: The Mechanics Behind the Risk

A Variable Universal Life insurance policy splits your premium between two components: the cost of insurance (COI) and investment subaccounts. These subaccounts function like mutual funds, letting you allocate money across stocks, bonds, or other assets. Sounds flexible, right? Here's where it gets complicated.

Your cash value fluctuates based on market performance. When investments grow, your account value increases. When they tank, you lose money. But there's a catch: insurance costs rise as you age. Those mounting expenses can erode your cash value faster than investment gains can offset them. I've seen policies where COI consumed 40% of premiums by year ten.

The Double-Edged Sword of Flexibility

VULs let you adjust premium payments and death benefits. Need to skip a payment? You can, using accumulated cash value. Want a higher death benefit? That's possible too. But this flexibility creates traps. Skip too many payments and your cash value evaporates. Increase your death benefit and COI skyrockets. The very features making VULs attractive become sources of financial pain.

Market Risk: The Obvious Way to Lose Money

Investment subaccounts mirror market performance. If you've allocated heavily to growth stocks and the market crashes 30%, your cash value drops accordingly. During the 2008 financial crisis, many VUL policyholders watched their cash values plummet. Some never recovered.

Consider Sarah, a 45-year-old professional who invested her VUL subaccounts in aggressive growth funds. When tech stocks collapsed in 2022, her $100,000 cash value dropped to $68,000. Her insurance costs remained the same, but now they consumed a larger percentage of her reduced account. This created a death spiral: higher costs forced her to withdraw more, further reducing investment potential.

Sequence of Returns Risk

Worst-case scenario? Bad market timing early in your policy. Negative returns when your cash value is small can permanently damage your policy. Imagine losing 20% in year two when your cash value is just $10,000. That $2,000 loss isn't just a number—it's money that won't compound for decades. This sequence risk hits hardest in the first 5-10 years when most policies are vulnerable.

Hidden Costs That Erode Your Investment

Beyond market risk, VULs carry expenses that quietly drain your account. Mortality and expense (M&E) charges typically range from 1-2% annually. Administrative fees add another 0.2-0.5%. And those investment subaccounts? They charge management fees of 0.5-1.5% or more.

Let's break down a typical $500 monthly premium: - Cost of insurance: $200 - M&E charges: $75 - Administrative fees: $15 - Subaccount fees: $50 - Actual investment: $160

Notice that only 32% of your premium goes toward investments? The rest covers insurance and fees. Over 20 years, these costs compound dramatically. A $100,000 investment growing at 7% gross returns just 4.5% net after all VUL fees—a 35% reduction in returns.

Surrender Charges: The Exit Penalty

Trying to get out early? Surrender charges apply, typically declining over 10-15 years. Year one might cost you 15% of your cash value. Year five: 8%. These charges exist because insurers front-load commissions and need time to recoup costs. Walking away too soon means losing thousands in surrender fees on top of whatever your investments lost.

When VULs Become Money Pits

Several scenarios transform VULs from flexible tools into financial disasters. First, inadequate funding. Agents often sell VULs with lower premiums than whole life requires. Sounds attractive until you realize those premiums won't cover rising insurance costs and investment growth.

Second, unrealistic return assumptions. Many illustrations show 7-8% returns. But after fees and insurance costs, actual returns often hover around 3-5%. When reality falls short of projections, your cash value stagnates while costs climb.

Third, policy lapsing. If your cash value drops below zero (yes, that's possible), your policy lapses and you lose everything. No death benefit. No cash value. Just gone. This happens when investment losses combine with rising COI and insufficient premium payments.

The Retirement Risk Factor

Retirement planning with VULs requires extreme caution. You're betting that investment returns will outpace increasing insurance costs for decades. But what if you retire during a bear market? Your reduced income might force you to withdraw more from the VUL, accelerating cash value depletion. Meanwhile, COI keeps climbing as you age. It's a dangerous combination that can leave you without coverage when you need it most.

VUL vs Other Insurance Options: A Cost Comparison

How does VUL stack up against alternatives? Let's compare costs on a $500,000 death benefit for a 40-year-old male.

Term Life Insurance

Annual premium: $500-700 Coverage period: 20-30 years Cash value: None Total cost over 20 years: $10,000-14,000

Whole Life Insurance

Annual premium: $8,000-10,000 Coverage period: Lifetime Cash value: Guaranteed growth Total cost over 20 years: $160,000-200,000 (but builds equity)

Variable Universal Life

Annual premium: $6,000-8,000 Coverage period: Lifetime (if funded properly) Cash value: Market-dependent Total cost over 20 years: $120,000-160,000 (plus potential losses)

The numbers reveal a harsh truth: VULs cost less than whole life upfront but carry market risk. Term insurance costs far less but provides no cash value or lifetime coverage. Your choice depends on whether you value flexibility, guarantees, or affordability most.

Strategies to Minimize VUL Losses

If you're committed to a VUL, several tactics can reduce your risk of losing money. First, overfund your policy. Pay more than the minimum premium, especially early on. This builds a cash value cushion that absorbs market downturns and rising COI.

Second, choose conservative investment allocations. While aggressive growth might seem tempting, a balanced approach of 40% stocks, 40% bonds, and 20% cash often performs better in VULs. Why? Lower volatility means steadier cash value growth to cover insurance costs.

Third, monitor your policy annually. Review cash value, COI trends, and investment performance. Many policyholders ignore their VULs for years, only to discover problems when it's too late. I recommend quarterly check-ins for the first five years, then annual reviews.

The 10-Year Rule

Here's a guideline I've developed: don't expect positive returns from a VUL until year ten. The first decade is dominated by fees, insurance costs, and market fluctuations. If your policy isn't showing progress by year seven, consider alternatives. By year ten, you should see consistent cash value growth exceeding insurance costs.

Who Should (and Shouldn't) Consider a VUL

VULs suit specific financial profiles. Ideal candidates have high income, long investment horizons, and tolerance for complexity. They value tax-deferred growth and potential tax-free death benefits. Business owners using VULs for key person insurance or estate planning often benefit from the flexibility.

However, VULs fail many people. If you're budget-conscious, prefer simplicity, or need guaranteed outcomes, avoid VULs. The same goes for anyone uncomfortable with market risk or lacking discipline to monitor the policy. Young families often find term insurance plus separate investments more cost-effective.

The Advisor Question

Who sells you the VUL matters tremendously. Commission-driven agents might push expensive policies that benefit them more than you. Fee-only advisors charging hourly rates often provide more objective guidance. Always ask: "How are you compensated for this recommendation?" If the answer isn't clear, walk away.

Frequently Asked Questions About VUL Losses

Can my VUL become worthless?

Yes. If cash value drops to zero and you don't pay premiums from other sources, your policy lapses. You lose both the death benefit and any remaining cash value. This "reverse dollar cost averaging" happens when COI rises faster than investment returns.

What happens if the market crashes while I have a VUL?

Your cash value drops immediately. If it falls below a certain threshold, you might need to pay additional premiums to keep the policy active. Some policies include premium flexibility riders that let you skip payments without lapsing, but these cost extra.

Are VULs good for retirement income?

They can be, but with caveats. VULs offer tax-deferred growth and potential tax-free loans. However, the combination of market risk and rising insurance costs makes them volatile retirement tools. Consider them a complement to, not replacement for, traditional retirement accounts.

How do I know if my VUL is losing too much money?

Monitor the cost of insurance as a percentage of cash value. If COI exceeds 75% of your cash value growth in any year, you're in dangerous territory. Also watch for declining cash value despite premium payments—this signals the policy may be unsustainable.

Verdict: The Bottom Line on VUL Risk

Variable Universal Life insurance offers flexibility and tax advantages, but it's not a free lunch. You can absolutely lose money through market declines, rising costs, and policy mismanagement. The question isn't whether VULs can lose money—they can and do—but whether the potential benefits justify the risks for your specific situation.

After twenty years in financial services, I've seen VULs work brilliantly for some and become expensive mistakes for others. The difference usually comes down to understanding the mechanics, funding adequately, and monitoring consistently. If you choose a VUL, treat it like a business investment requiring active management, not a set-and-forget insurance product.

And if you're unsure? Start with simpler options. A cheap term policy plus a diversified investment account often delivers better outcomes than a complex VUL with hidden risks. Sometimes the most sophisticated solution is the one that keeps you from losing money in the first place.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.