YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
claims  coverage  covered  covers  damage  dwelling  insurance  insurers  people  perils  policies  policy  property  protection  rental  
LATEST POSTS

What Are DP1, DP2, and DP3 in Insurance? A No-Nonsense Breakdown

We’ve all heard horror stories: a burst pipe ruins a vacation home, and the owner finds out too late their policy only covered “named perils.” That changes everything. These form types aren’t just alphabet soup—they shape your financial safety net. Let’s cut through the jargon and unpack what each one really means in real-world terms.

Understanding Dwelling Property Policies: Not All Coverage Is Equal

Dwelling property forms—DP1, DP2, DP3—aren’t for primary residences. They’re designed for rental units, seasonal homes, or vacant properties. If you own a beach cottage in Cape May or rent out a bungalow in Austin, these are your go-to policies. They’re similar to HO3 homeowner policies, but with tighter restrictions and fewer personal liability perks. The core difference? How they define risk.

DP1 is the bare-bones option. It’s cheap. It’s limited. It only covers a short list of specific disasters—like fire, lightning, windstorms, or vandalism. Everything else? You're on your own. If a tree falls on your rental during a storm, that’s covered. But if the roof caves in from snow buildup? Not unless it’s explicitly listed. And yes, that’s where people get burned—literally.

What DP1 Covers: The “Named Perils” Approach

Think of DP1 as a menu where you can only order three items. The covered perils are narrow: fire, lightning, explosion, windstorm, hail, smoke, aircraft, vehicles, riot, civil commotion, vandalism, sinkhole collapse (in some states), and volcanic eruption. It’s a weird mix—why include volcanic eruption but not water damage from a burst pipe? Because insurers structure these forms to minimize exposure. That said, some states require additional inclusions.

You might assume “dwelling” means the whole structure. Not so. DP1 often covers only the roof and walls, not attached garages or decks. Personal property? Forget it. Liability protection? Almost nonexistent. Replacement cost? Rare. Most DP1 policies pay only actual cash value—meaning depreciation gets deducted. A 10-year-old roof damaged by wind might net you $1,200 instead of the $4,000 it costs to replace. And that’s before your deductible hits.

When DP1 Makes Sense (Yes, Really)

It’s not all bad. If you own a vacant cabin in northern Michigan that sits empty nine months a year, DP1 might be your best bet. Low premium—often under $500 annually—makes it attractive. But you’re gambling. You’re covered if lightning strikes. You’re not if heavy rains seep through a cracked foundation. And since maintenance neglect voids claims, one overlooked gutter could void your entire payout. So yes, it works—for low-risk, low-value properties where you’re willing to accept the gamble.

DP2 Insurance: Stepping Up Without Going All-In

DP2 is the middle child—more generous than DP1 but not as robust as DP3. It still operates on a named perils basis, but the list is longer. Now you’re covered for things like weight of ice, snow, or sleet; accidental discharge from plumbing; freezing of pipes; and even falling objects. That’s a big deal if your rental is in a snowy climate. A collapsed porch from snow load? DP2 likely covers it. DP1? Probably not.

Another upgrade: DP2 usually includes replacement cost coverage for the dwelling. That means if your roof needs replacing, you get the full cost minus depreciation. For a $15,000 roof, that could mean an extra $6,000 in your pocket. But—and this is critical—personal property and liability limits remain tight. We’re talking $1,000 to $5,000 for contents, max. If a tenant’s laptop, TV, and furniture go up in smoke, they’re out of luck.

How DP2 Handles Secondary Structures

Detached garages? Tool sheds? Fences? DP2 typically covers them at 10% of the dwelling value. So if your cottage is insured for $200,000, the shed gets $20,000. That’s better than nothing. But here’s the catch: coverage only kicks in if the damage stems from a named peril. A raccoon chewing through wiring? Not covered. A storm blowing down the fence? Covered. The line is thin, and adjusters love to split it.

Why Some Landlords Stick With DP2

It’s about cost control. DP2 premiums average $800 to $1,200 a year—less than DP3. And for landlords with multiple units, that adds up. A portfolio of five vacation rentals in Asheville could save $2,500 annually by choosing DP2 over DP3. But that’s only smart if the properties are well-maintained and in low-risk zones. One major hailstorm could erase those savings fast.

DP3 Insurance: The Broadest Protection (But Not Perfect)

DP3 is the gold standard. It covers your dwelling on an “open perils” basis—meaning everything is covered unless explicitly excluded. That’s a massive shift. Fire? Covered. Windstorm? Covered. A meteor strike? Probably. The burden flips: now the insurer must prove something isn’t covered, not you. This is why insurers hate DP3 in high-risk areas. They’ve started pulling back—some won’t offer it in Florida or coastal Texas.

It includes replacement cost on the dwelling and offers broader protection for other structures. But—and this is where people don’t think about this enough—personal property is still limited to named perils. So while your house is covered for all risks, your tenant’s stuff? Only fire, theft, or vandalism. That creates a strange imbalance: the building is ultra-protected, the contents are hanging by a thread.

The Hidden Gaps in DP3

Flood? Not covered. Earthquake? No. Sewer backup? Only with an endorsement. And DP3 still excludes wear and tear, mold (unless sudden and accidental), and damage from pests. I’ve seen claims denied because a landlord ignored termite warnings for years—then blamed a sudden collapse on “accidental damage.” Doesn’t fly. Insurers dig into maintenance records. They’ll deny claims based on photos from five years prior if they show rotting wood or sagging gutters.

And here’s a dirty secret: some companies label policies as “DP3 equivalent” but use proprietary forms with tighter exclusions. Always read the fine print. One insurer’s DP3 might exclude wind in hurricane zones; another might cap roof damage at 25% of total cost. The labels look the same. The payouts aren’t.

DP1 vs DP2 vs DP3: Which Should You Choose?

Let’s cut to the chase. If you’re managing a high-value rental in a volatile climate—say, a $400,000 lake house in Colorado—DP3 is non-negotiable. The risk of wildfire, hail, or snow load is too high to rely on named perils. But if you own a modest condo in Phoenix that rents for $1,800 a month? DP1 might suffice. The climate’s stable, the structure’s simple, and the exposure is low.

DP2 sits in the middle—ideal for mid-tier properties with moderate risk. A duplex in Portland with older plumbing? DP2 covers freezing pipes and accidental leaks. That’s valuable. But because it doesn’t cover all perils, you’re still exposed to edge cases. And that’s exactly where landlords get tripped up.

Real-World Example: Three Policies, One Storm

Imagine a hailstorm hits Boulder. Three rental homes are damaged. One has DP1: only wind and hail are covered, but the policy excludes roof damage over 10 years old. Payout: $2,000 after depreciation. Second, DP2: roof is 8 years old, covered at replacement cost. Payout: $14,500. Third, DP3: same roof, open perils. Payout: $16,200—plus debris removal and temporary repairs. The difference? Over $14,000. That changes everything.

Cost Comparison Across Policy Types

Annual premiums vary wildly by location. In Arizona, DP1 runs $420, DP2 $790, DP3 $1,350. In coastal Louisiana, those numbers jump to $980, $1,800, and $3,100. The gap widens in high-risk zones. But here’s the twist: some insurers offer discounts for security systems, storm shutters, or updated roofs. A $500 upgrade in wiring could knock 15% off a DP3 premium. Worth it? We’re far from it if you’re only saving $200 a year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can You Upgrade From DP1 to DP3 Mid-Term?

Yes, but not always easily. Insurers may require a property inspection first. If your roof is failing or the electrical system is outdated, they might refuse. And premiums jump immediately. One client in Santa Fe tried to upgrade after a wildfire warning—denied due to “imminent risk.” So don’t wait until disaster’s at the door. Timing matters.

Do These Policies Cover Tenant Belongings?

No. Tenants need their own renters insurance. DP forms cover the structure and, minimally, landlord-owned appliances or furniture. If a renter’s $3,000 gaming setup burns in a fire, they’re out of luck unless they have a policy. And honestly, it is unclear how many landlords even tell tenants this. That’s a lawsuit waiting to happen.

Is Flood Coverage Included in DP3?

Absolutely not. Flood is always excluded—across all dwelling forms. You need a separate NFIP or private flood policy. And that’s the irony: people think DP3 is “full coverage,” but it leaves one of the most common disasters completely uncovered. Data is still lacking, but FEMA estimates 25% of flood claims come from low-to-moderate risk zones—places where owners never bought extra protection.

The Bottom Line: Don’t Confuse Form Number With Peace of Mind

DP3 sounds like the ultimate shield. It’s not. It’s broader, yes. But exclusions remain, and insurers are getting stricter. I am convinced that too many property owners buy DP3 for the label, not the details. The real protection isn’t in the form number—it’s in the endorsements, the maintenance logs, and the fine print. My advice? Always add water backup, equipment breakdown, and inflation guard endorsements. They cost extra—$100 to $300 a year—but they prevent six-figure gaps.

The market is shifting. In California, some insurers now offer DP3 policies with wind deductibles as high as 10%. That means a $500,000 home with $70,000 in wind damage might only get $20,000 after a $50,000 deductible. Which explains why savvy investors are turning to surplus lines carriers or state pools. And that’s the real lesson: knowing DP1, DP2, and DP3 is just the start. The rest? That’s where the real risk lives.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.