YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
beautiful  breasts  burton  called  diaries  elizabeth  exactly  gossip  passion  people  physical  punchline  quotes  richard  taylor  
LATEST POSTS

What Did Richard Burton Say About Elizabeth Taylor's Breasts?

What Did Richard Burton Say About Elizabeth Taylor's Breasts?

You’d think, after decades of biographies, documentaries, and tell-all memoirs, we’d have a definitive answer. We don’t. And that’s where things get interesting.

The Myth of the Infamous Quote: Separating Gossip from Reality

Richard Burton never made a documented statement about Elizabeth Taylor’s physical attributes that fits the lurid version circulating online. The so-called “quote” — often phrased as something like “The most beautiful knockers in the world” — doesn’t appear in any of his diaries, interviews, or letters. It sounds like something a 1970s gossip columnist would invent after seeing them stumble out of a Parisian nightclub at 3 a.m., martini glasses still clutched in their fingers.

But because they were that kind of couple—the kind who kissed like they were erasing history and argued like they wanted to rewrite it—people assumed. They assumed he must have said something outrageous. And so the myth grew. Like mold in a damp theater dressing room. Persistent. Smelly. Hard to scrape off. The thing is, Burton was a man who quoted T.S. Eliot mid-swing at a golf course. He wasn’t one for locker-room crudeness, even when liquored up. His admiration for Taylor was theatrical, poetic. He called her “a volcano. An asteroid. A force of nature.” Not exactly “nice tits,” is it?

Origins of the Rumor: Tabloids and Misattribution

The quote likely emerged from a stew of tabloid laziness and audience expectation. In the 1960s and ‘70s, the press covered Burton and Taylor like they were royal war criminals. Every flight, every hotel, every whispered argument was front-page fodder. Reporters needed soundbites. When real ones weren’t juicy enough, they made them up. Or twisted them. There’s a 1964 Daily Mail article that paraphrases Burton saying Taylor had “the most perfectly formed woman in the business,” which got rephrased over time into something anatomically specific. That’s how these things go.

And yes—language around female bodies was grosser back then. But even by those standards, no reputable journalist attributed a crude remark about her breasts to Burton. Not in the New York Times. Not in Vanity Fair. Not even in National Enquirer, which wasn’t exactly operating under ethical constraints.

Burton’s Actual Words: Passion, Poetry, and Possession

What Burton actually said about Taylor reveals a man in thrall to her entire being. In his diaries—published posthumously in 2012—he wrote: “She is so alive. Even when she sleeps, she hums with energy.” He compared her eyes to “burnt amber.” Called her voice “a cello dipped in smoke.” That’s the man we’re dealing with. A dramatic, romantic, slightly self-mythologizing Welshman who saw Taylor as a mythological figure, not a pin-up.

He once told a reporter, “Liz doesn’t walk into a room. She invades it.” That changes everything. You don’t follow that up with a joke about cleavage. Not if you’re trying to keep your dignity. Or your marriage (which, granted, they lost and found five times).

Why This Rumor Persists: The Cultural Fascination with Celebrity Bodies

We’re far from it when it comes to treating celebrities as full humans. Taylor, in particular, spent her life being reduced. First to a child star. Then to a sex symbol. Then to a punchline about weight, marriages, and medical bills. Reducing her to her breasts—and then fabricating quotes about them—is part of that legacy. It’s easier to talk about anatomy than about power. Or agency. Or the fact that she was one of the first women to command $1 million per film (1963, Cleopatra, $1.25 million to be exact).

But here’s the irony: Taylor herself leaned into provocation. She wore 50-carat diamond rings and mink coats like armor. She knew how to weaponize glamour. Her 1969 film Boom! was a camp disaster—but she strutted through it like a queen on fire. So maybe that’s why people assume Burton said something crude. Because Taylor didn’t shy from sensuality. But conflating her confidence with objectification? That’s on us.

The Difference Between Sensuality and Objectification

To give a sense of scale: Marilyn Monroe was called “a blonde goddess” while being quietly drugged by studio execs. Taylor was called “a monster” for demanding control over her roles and her image. She wasn’t just desired. She demanded to be seen. That’s different. And that’s exactly where the Burton breast quote falls apart—it reduces a woman who fought for autonomy to a body part, and a man who adored her complexity to a crude remark he never made.

How the Media Shapes What We Remember

Consider this: in 1975, People magazine ran a cover with the headline “Elizabeth Taylor: Too Big? Too Drunk? Too Married?” Twenty years later, outlets were calling her an AIDS activist hero. Same woman. Different narrative. The Burton quote myth is part of that first phase—the era when women in power were punished with gossip. And we’re still cleaning up that mess.

Burton & Taylor: A Relationship Beyond the Bedroom

Let’s be clear about this: their relationship wasn’t just sex. Yes, it was torrid. Yes, they drank enough vodka to fill a small lake (Burton’s average: 2-3 bottles per night during their peak years). But they also discussed philosophy. Read Shakespeare aloud to each other. Donated millions to charity. He supported her through surgeries. She stood by him during career slumps. Their bond was intellectual, emotional, and deeply co-dependent—not just physical.

And because they lived so publicly, every glance was interpreted. Every touch analyzed. So when they held hands at a premiere, someone wrote that he whispered something “about her curves” in her ear. Probably didn’t happen. But it sold papers. Which explains why the myth survives.

Love Letters and Literary References

Burton once sent Taylor a letter quoting Donne: “No man is an island.” He underlined “no man” and wrote beside it, “but you, my love, are an entire continent.” That’s the stuff he said. That’s what he wrote. Not one-liners for a locker room mirror.

Burton’s Real Quotes About Women and Beauty

Burton did talk about female beauty—but in a broader, more reflective way. In a 1970 interview with The Guardian, he said, “A beautiful woman is one who makes you forget the word ‘beautiful’ the moment you see her.” That’s poetic. Thoughtful. The opposite of reductive.

And because he was a man of contradictions—deeply romantic yet often cruel, brilliant yet self-destructive—his views on women weren’t monolithic. But he respected strength. He was drawn to women who challenged him. Taylor did that daily. She once threw a platinum cigarette case at his head during an argument in Acapulco. He kept the dent as a souvenir.

Compare This to Other Hollywood Quotes About Bodies

Contrast Burton’s actual words with, say, Hugh Hefner’s Playboy-era quips. Or the crude remarks attributed to Sinatra about actresses. Burton’s language was always more layered. More theatrical. He might have been loud, drunken, and excessive—but he wasn’t crude in the way this fake quote suggests.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Richard Burton ever comment on Elizabeth Taylor’s appearance?

Yes—repeatedly, and with deep admiration. But always in poetic, dramatic terms. He called her “magnificent,” “radiant,” “a work of art.” Never vulgar. His diaries are full of lyrical descriptions, not crude assessments.

Is there audio or video of Burton saying this?

No. Not a single recording exists. Not in interviews, not in home films, not in leaked tapes. The absence of evidence, in this case, is telling. If he’d said something that explosive, someone would have preserved it.

Why do people keep repeating this quote?

Because it fits a narrative. Two stars. Endless passion. A scandalous love story. People want proof of heat. And when real quotes aren’t sensational enough, they invent them. It’s easier than understanding complexity.

The Bottom Line: What We Know, What We Don’t, and Why It Matters

Honestly, it is unclear how one fake quote gained such traction. Maybe because it feels true in a symbolic way—Burton and Taylor were raw, excessive, unapologetically physical. But symbol and fact aren’t the same. The real tragedy isn’t the misquote. It’s that we’d rather remember a made-up line about breasts than the actual depth of their connection.

I find this overrated—the idea that great love must be reduced to body parts or drunken remarks. Their story was about art, addiction, fame, and the cost of living too loudly in the public eye. That’s what deserves remembering. Not some phantom punchline.

And that’s exactly where we should draw the line: between myth and truth, between gossip and legacy.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.