YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
actually  barcelona  clause  contract  florentino  football  lionel  madrid  million  player  pérez  release  remains  spanish  transfer  
LATEST POSTS

The White House Whisper: Did Real Madrid Ever Actually Try to Buy Lionel Messi from Barcelona?

The White House Whisper: Did Real Madrid Ever Actually Try to Buy Lionel Messi from Barcelona?

The Forbidden Dance: Understanding the Rivalry Context and Transfer Taboos

You have to understand the sheer weight of the atmosphere back then. We aren't just talking about a player moving from one club to another; we are talking about a total cultural betrayal. In the Spanish capital, the obsession with "Galácticos" isn't just a recruitment strategy, it is a theological pillar. Florentino Pérez views the world’s best players as assets that naturally belong in white. But Messi? He was the heartbeat of La Masia. Attempting to snatch him was less like a transfer and more like an act of war. Because of this, every approach had to be shrouded in enough deniability to protect both parties if—or when—things went south.

The Figo Shadow and the Ghost of 2000

Every time a whisper emerged about Madrid eyeing a Barcelona star, the ghost of Luís Figo hovered over the negotiations. That 60 million Euro move in 2000 changed the DNA of the Clásico forever. It created a trauma in Catalonia that hasn't fully healed even decades later. If Pérez could pull off the same feat with the greatest player to ever lace up boots, it wouldn't just be a sporting victory. It would be a total, irreversible demolition of the Barcelona identity. The thing is, everyone knew the price tag would be astronomical, yet the Madrid board seemed strangely unbothered by the release clause dynamics that governed Spanish contracts at the time.

The Unwritten Rule of the Gentlemans Agreement

There is this persistent myth that the two clubs have a "non-aggression pact" regarding their star players. I personally find that laughable. While they might play nice in front of the cameras at LFP meetings, the reality is a constant, low-level simmering conflict. When it comes to Messi, the rules didn't apply. We're far from a situation where a simple phone call would suffice. Instead, intermediaries—shadowy figures with no official ties to either boardroom—were the ones carrying the messages across the Puente Aéreo. It was a game of whispers where one wrong word could trigger a PR disaster of nuclear proportions.

2013: The Year

Common myths and strategic delusions

The problem is that the collective memory of football fans often functions like a broken kaleidoscope, distorting the reality of whether Madrid tried to buy Messi into a series of fever dreams. One pervasive misconception suggests that Florentino Pérez made a formal, board-approved bid every single summer between 2011 and 2015. This is categorically false. While the interest was a permanent background radiation, a formal offer requires a triggered release clause, and the 250 million euro figure attached to the Argentine during his peak was a psychological barrier few dared to cross. But did they really think they could just fax a check and change the course of history?

The tax fraud catalyst

In 2013, the landscape shifted when the Spanish Treasury began circling the Messi family. Some analysts argue this was the only window where a move was mathematically plausible because the player felt unprotected by the Catalan hierarchy. Let's be clear: feeling unprotected is not the same as wanting to wear white. Real Madrid looked at the legal chaos as a leverage point, yet the idea that Messi was ready to sign out of spite ignores the sheer tribalism of the Clásico. You cannot simply delete a decade of rivalry because of a tax audit. It’s an absurd oversimplification of how sporting loyalty interacts with legal pressure.

The Adidas conspiracy theory

We often hear the whispers regarding the German sportswear giant. Because Messi was their primary asset while Barcelona was (and is) a Nike stronghold, rumors suggested Adidas offered to subsidize half of the transfer fee to get their icon into a Real Madrid kit. It sounds like a perfect corporate thriller, except that the numbers never actually added up on a balance sheet. Marketing synergies have limits. Which explains why this theory remains relegated to the darker corners of internet forums rather than the pages of reputable financial journals. (And honestly, would Nike have sat idly by while their biggest rival hijacked the most marketable player on earth?)

The hidden variable: The 2013 private jet meeting

If we dig beneath the surface of public denials, we find the "shadow negotiations" that define elite football. According to investigative reports leaked years later, a private jet was allegedly chartered for a meeting involving Messi’s inner circle and intermediaries linked to the Chamartín offices. The goal was simple: to gauge if the 250 million euro release clause was a bridge or a wall. As a result: the meeting served more as a scouting mission for the player's camp to see how much Barcelona would have to pay to keep him happy. It was a poker move. Madrid was the "monster under the bed" used to extract a better contract from the Camp Nou board.

Expert advice: Watch the wage structure

When you evaluate if Madrid tried to buy Messi, don't just look at the transfer fee. Look at the wage bill. At the time, Cristiano Ronaldo was the undisputed king of the Santiago Bernabéu, earning approximately 17 million euros net per season. Bringing in Messi would have required a salary of at least 20 million euros, instantly nuking the dressing room hierarchy. My advice to anyone analyzing these historical "what-ifs" is to follow the ego, not just the money. The issue remains that no club, not even one as wealthy as Madrid, could survive the nuclear fallout of having those two particular solar systems colliding in the same locker room.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Real Madrid ever make an official written offer for Lionel Messi?

No formal, paper-trail document was ever submitted to the LFP or Barcelona because doing so would have triggered a total war between the two clubs. Instead, the approach in 2013 was conducted through intermediaries to maintain plausible deniability for Florentino Pérez. The rumored offer included a eight-year contract and a massive net salary that would have shattered the existing Spanish wage records. However, without a signature, these remain "proposals of intent" rather than a binding legal pursuit. The 250 million euro release clause was discussed as a starting point, but the paperwork never left the vault.

Was Cristiano Ronaldo aware of the attempts to sign his rival?

Information from the era suggests the Portuguese superstar was acutely aware of any movement that might threaten his status as the world's most expensive player. Any serious attempt to bring the Argentine to the capital would have necessitated a simultaneous renegotiation of Ronaldo’s terms. The Real Madrid board was walking a tightrope, knowing that Messi's arrival would likely force their current talisman toward the exit. This internal friction acted as a natural deterrent, preventing a casual inquiry from turning into a full-scale assault. In short, the presence of one king made the crowning of another nearly impossible.

How many times did the clubs actually discuss a potential transfer?

Direct discussions between the two presidents regarding a Messi transfer were non-existent, as the gentleman's agreement between the giants usually prevents direct poaching. All communication flowed through high-level agents like Jorge Messi or third-party fixers who specialized in multi-million euro movements. Records suggest three distinct "poking" phases: 2011, 2013, and a final, desperate check-in during 2015. Each time, the answer was a swift rejection, backed by a loyalty clause that made the operation financially suicidal for the buying club. Yet, the persistence of the rumors proves that in the world of high-stakes football, "impossible" is just a temporary state of being.

A definitive verdict on the white ghost

The obsession with whether Madrid tried to buy Messi reveals more about our desire for chaos than the reality of the transfer market. It was a flirtation born of pure ambition, a tactical attempt by Pérez to achieve the ultimate checkmate in the history of the sport. We must accept that while the financial infrastructure was briefly put in place, the soul of the player was never for sale to the highest bidder in the capital. The irony is that the mere threat of the move did more damage to Barcelona’s long-term finances than a transfer ever could have, forcing them into reckless contract renewals. It was the greatest heist never committed. Ultimately, Messi in a white shirt remains the most expensive hallucination in football history, a phantom signing that defined an era of unprecedented rivalry. Stop looking for the signed contract; the true victory for Madrid was making the world believe it was actually possible.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.