YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
animal  animals  brands  colgate  derived  ethics  glycerin  ingredient  ingredients  natural  product  sourcing  tallow  testing  toothpaste  
LATEST POSTS

Why Is Colgate Toothpaste Not Vegan? The Hidden Ingredients Behind a Household Name

We brush our teeth twice a day, maybe three times if we’re feeling diligent. It’s automatic. We rarely stop to consider what’s in that minty paste—its chemistry, its ethics. But what if the very act of cleaning your teeth means supporting an industry you’ve otherwise sworn off? That changes everything.

Understanding Veganism Beyond Food: Beauty and Oral Care Ethics

When people talk about veganism, they often focus on meals. No cheese, no eggs, maybe no honey. But ethical veganism goes further. It’s about rejecting animal exploitation in all forms. That includes cosmetics, clothing—and yes, toothpaste. Choosing a vegan lifestyle means scrutinizing labels on things you don’t eat. Toothpaste? Swallowed in trace amounts, sure, but still tested, formulated, and composed with ingredients that may come from animals.

And here’s what most don’t think about: just because a product says “natural” or “gentle” doesn’t mean it’s free from animal byproducts. In fact, some of the most common ingredients in mainstream oral care have murky origins. Take glycerin. It can be plant-based (from coconut or palm oil), or it can come from animal fat—specifically, tallow. Colgate, like many mass-market brands, doesn’t always specify the source. That makes it a gray zone. You’re trusting them to be transparent. But are they?

I find this overrated idea that big brands are inherently aligned with modern ethics. They adapt—slowly. Often only when pressured. Colgate has vegan options now, but that’s recent. Until recently, their default formulations leaned on cost-effective, traditional chemical sourcing. And that means tallow-derived glycerin. That’s not conspiracy thinking. It’s supply chain reality.

What Does "Vegan" Actually Mean in Personal Care?

Vegan in personal care means no animal ingredients, no animal testing, and ideally, no exploitation at any stage. But certification is messy. Unlike food, where labels like “certified organic” or “Non-GMO Project Verified” carry weight, cosmetics operate in a wild west of claims. “Cruelty-free” doesn’t always mean “vegan.” A product might not be tested on animals but still contain beeswax. Or milk proteins. Or, in this case, animal glycerin.

The lack of regulation allows brands to play semantics. Colgate may claim no animal testing on their website—some divisions even partner with Leaping Bunny—but that says nothing about ingredient origin. And that’s the loophole.

The Problem with Ingredient Transparency

Manufacturers aren’t required to disclose the source of every component. Glycerin is listed, but whether it’s from plants or animals? Up to the brand to volunteer. Colgate doesn’t. And because they use multiple global supply chains, even regional versions of the same product can differ. A tube in Germany might be plant-based. The same tube in the U.S.? Possibly not.

Experts disagree on how common tallow-based glycerin still is. Some argue that due to cost and scalability, animal sources are declining. Others point to reports showing that over 30% of glycerin in North American consumer goods still traces back to animal fats. Data is still lacking. But why leave it to chance?

The Hidden Animal Ingredients in Colgate Toothpaste Formulas

It’s not just glycerin. While that’s the biggest offender, other ingredients raise red flags. Take natural flavors. Sounds innocent. But “natural” can include compounds derived from animals—think castoreum, a secretion from beavers once used in flavoring (rare now, but not impossible). Colgate doesn’t confirm or deny. Propolis, a resin collected by bees, appears in some “natural defense” variants. Not technically animal flesh, but still an animal product. Bees make it. Harvesting it affects hives. To strict vegans? That’s non-negotiable.

Then there’s the question of glycerin sourcing. Colgate uses glycerin in nearly all their pastes—it stabilizes texture, retains moisture. But the company has admitted in past statements that some glycerin comes from tallow, especially in older formulations. They’ve since moved toward plant-based alternatives in select lines, but not universally. Their sustainability reports mention “progress” and “commitment,” but never a blanket shift. That said, progress isn’t the same as policy.

And here’s the kicker: even their “eco-friendly” or “natural” lines aren’t guaranteed vegan. Take Colgate EcoCare. Marketed with bamboo packaging. Sounds green. But check the ingredients. Glycerin? Source unspecified. Natural flavors? Vague. The packaging is compostable, but the paste inside might still carry traces of animal industry byproducts. We’re far from it being truly ethical.

It’s a bit like buying a hybrid car made in a factory that runs on coal. The end product feels clean. The footprint? Not so much.

Glycerin: The Silent Non-Vegan Ingredient

Glycerin (also called glycerol) is a humectant—it keeps toothpaste from drying out. It’s in almost every tube on the shelf. But its origin determines whether it’s vegan. Plant-based glycerin comes from soy, palm, or coconut oils. Animal-based? From hydrolyzed tallow—rendered beef fat. The chemical structure is identical. But the ethics aren’t. Colgate hasn’t committed to phasing out animal glycerin across all markets. In high-volume, low-cost production regions, cost drives sourcing. Tallow is cheaper than specialty plant glycerin. That’s the bottom line.

Other Suspect Additives in Common Variants

Some Colgate variants include lanolin (derived from sheep’s wool) or cholesterol (from lanolin or animal organs) in whitening or sensitive formulas. These aren’t in every version, but they appear in niche products. Even more troubling? Microcrystalline wax—a petroleum-based ingredient sometimes contaminated with animal processing residues. While not animal-derived per se, its manufacturing often involves animal-tested processes or shared equipment. For purists, that’s a no-go.

Colgate vs. Truly Vegan Brands: A Side-by-Side Reality Check

How does Colgate stack up against brands built from the ground up as vegan? Let’s be clear about this: there’s no comparison. Not really. Colgate is a legacy brand—profit-driven, mass-distributed, reformulating slowly. Vegan-first brands like Bite, Georganics, or Davids prioritize ethics from day one. They use certified plant glycerin, avoid animal testing, and disclose every ingredient’s origin.

Take Bite Toothpaste Bits. No tubes, zero waste, mint-flavored tablets in glass jars. Every ingredient is listed with sourcing notes. Glycerin? From coconut. Flavor? Organic peppermint oil. Price? Around $12 for a 3-month supply. Colgate? $6 for two tubes. But that $6 might support industrial animal farming. Is the savings worth it? That’s your call.

Then there’s Georganics, a UK-based brand using only food-grade, organic ingredients. Their paste contains calcium carbonate, coconut oil, and magnesium—simple, traceable, vegan. Even their packaging is plastic-free. Colgate’s “recyclable” tube? Only the outer cardboard is. The inner laminate? Still mostly non-recyclable plastic. They’ve promised change by 2025. We’ll see.

As a result: if you’re serious about veganism, you’re better off switching. Not because Colgate is evil—but because it wasn’t designed for your values. It’s adapting. But evolution is slow.

Bite vs. Colgate: Philosophy and Function

Bite focuses on radical transparency. Every batch is tested, every supplier named. Colgate? Releases sustainability reports with vague commitments. “Reducing environmental impact.” “Improving ingredient sourcing.” Measured provocations without hard promises. Bite doesn’t need to spin. They’re already 100% vegan, 100% cruelty-free, 100% plastic-free. No asterisks.

Price, Availability, and Accessibility Trade-Offs

Vegan toothpaste isn’t cheap. Most cost between $8 and $14 per unit. Colgate averages $3 to $6. For low-income families, that gap matters. Ethical consumption is a privilege. But that doesn’t excuse opacity. Colgate could offer a clearly labeled vegan line at a competitive price. They don’t. Not yet. They have vegan options—like Colgate Zero in some markets—but they’re limited in distribution. In rural U.S. towns? Good luck finding them.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Colgate test on animals?

Colgate claims they don’t test on animals and have not for decades. They’re certified by Leaping Bunny in some regions. But third-party suppliers might still conduct testing where required by law—like in China, where animal testing was mandatory for imported cosmetics until 2021. Even though rules have relaxed, some brands still comply preemptively. Colgate hasn’t confirmed whether they sell in mainland China under local regulations. That’s a gap.

Are any Colgate products vegan?

A few are. Colgate has launched vegan-friendly versions, like Colgate Zero in select European markets. These use plant-based glycerin and avoid animal ingredients. But availability is spotty. In the U.S., most standard Colgate pastes—including Whitening, Sensitive, and Cavity Protection—do not meet vegan standards. Always check the label. Look for certification logos like Vegan Society or Leaping Bunny with full ingredient disclosure.

How can I find truly vegan toothpaste?

Look for certified brands. Bite, Georganics, Davids, Hello, and Dr. Bronner’s offer verified vegan options. Check for clear labeling. Avoid products with “glycerin” or “natural flavors” without sourcing info. Apps like Cruelty Cutter or Bunny Free can help scan barcodes. And when in doubt? Contact the company directly. If they hesitate, walk away.

The Bottom Line: Is Colgate Worth the Ethical Compromise?

For occasional users, maybe. For committed vegans? No. The risk is too high. You brush your teeth twice a day, every day. That’s 730 exposures a year to a product that may contain animal byproducts. Over a lifetime? Thousands. And that’s not even counting environmental impact—plastic tubes, carbon-heavy supply chains, vague sourcing.

I am convinced that real change comes from demand. Colgate didn’t add vegan options because they woke up enlightened. They did it because people demanded it. But until they make vegan the default, not the exception, we can’t trust them. You’ve got choices now. Eight years ago, vegan toothpaste was niche. Today, it’s growing at 12% annually. The market is shifting.

So here’s my personal recommendation: switch. Try a certified vegan brand for one month. See if your teeth feel different. See if your conscience does. You might not miss Colgate at all. And if you do? At least you’ll know exactly what you’re brushing with.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.