YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
actually  anymore  biological  disease  eradication  global  health  pathogens  people  permanent  plague  rinderpest  smallpox  vaccine  variola  
LATEST POSTS

The Ghost in the Vials: Why Smallpox Is the Only Human Disease That Does Not Exist Anymore

The Ghost in the Vials: Why Smallpox Is the Only Human Disease That Does Not Exist Anymore

The Eradication Myth and the Reality of Global Biological Victories

When people ask about which disease does not exist anymore, they usually expect a long list of ancient plagues that vanished into the ether. They don't. Most of our historical boogeymen—the Black Death, leprosy, even the terrifying "sweating sickness" of Tudor England—are still kicking around in corners of the globe or have evolved into less recognizable forms. Smallpox stands alone on the podium. It was a brutal, scarring, and frequently fatal infection caused by the Variola virus, which haunted humanity for at least 3,000 years before we finally cornered it. I find it somewhat poetic that the very first vaccine ever developed was the weapon that eventually finished the job. Yet, eradication is a high bar that most pathogens simply refuse to clear because they have "reservoirs" in animals, meaning even if every human is cured, the virus just waits in a bat or a bird for the next chance to jump back.

The Difference Between Elimination and Total Eradication

Where it gets tricky is the terminology. Doctors use the word "elimination" to describe getting rid of a disease in a specific geographic area, like how we "eliminated" polio from the Americas in 1994. But total eradication means the permanent reduction to zero of the worldwide incidence of an infection. It is a permanent, irreversible achievement. Or so we hope. Because Smallpox had no animal host—it only lived in us—we were able to hunt it down to the last person. Once the chain of human-to-human transmission was broken in Somalia in 1977, the virus had nowhere left to go. But does that mean it’s truly gone? Honestly, it’s unclear if we can ever call a virus "dead" when we have the technology to rebuild it from a digital sequence.

A Brief Timeline of the Final Kill

The Global Smallpox Eradication Program was launched by the WHO in 1967. At that time, the disease was still killing 2 million people annually across 33 countries. Think about that for a second. That is the population of a major city being wiped off the map every single year by a single virus. By 1975, the more severe form, Variola major, saw its last natural case in a girl named Rahima Banu in Bangladesh. Two years later, the final case of Variola minor occurred in Ali Maow Maalin, a hospital cook in Somalia. He survived, and with his recovery, the wild virus effectively ceased to be. This wasn't just a medical success; it was a feat of cold, hard logistics involving millions of bifurcated needles and a relentless "search and containment" strategy.

Technical Mastery: The Biological Mechanics of the Variola Virus

Smallpox was an exceptionally "stable" virus, which actually worked in our favor. Unlike the flu or the current iterations of respiratory viruses that mutate every time someone sneezes in an airport, Variola didn't change its coat very often. This meant the vaccine stayed effective for decades. The virus itself was a large, brick-shaped orthopoxvirus with a double-stranded DNA genome. It didn't just cause spots; it triggered a systemic "cytokine storm" that led to internal bleeding and organ failure. Because the incubation period lasted about 12 to 14 days, health workers had a narrow window to find anyone who had been in contact with a patient and vaccinate them, creating a human shield of immunity. Is it possible to replicate this today? Experts disagree, largely because the modern world is far more mobile and skeptical than the one that killed Smallpox.

The Role of the Bifurcated Needle in 1970s Medicine

Sometimes the most sophisticated problems are solved by the simplest tools. The bifurcated needle, a tiny steel rod with two prongs, allowed for a technique called "multiple puncture vaccination." It was cheap, required very little vaccine, and could be used by people with almost no medical training. This tool changed everything. It replaced the expensive and finicky jet injectors that were prone to breaking down in the heat of rural India or sub-Saharan Africa. By dipping the prongs into the Vaccinia virus (a less harmful relative of smallpox) and poking the skin fifteen times, practitioners ensured the body would recognize and fight the real deal. We're far from that level of simplicity in modern biological interventions, which explains why we struggle with more complex pathogens today.

Why Animal Reservoirs Are the Ultimate Dealbreaker

Why isn't the list of which disease does not exist anymore longer? The answer lies in the woods. Most infectious diseases are zoonotic. If you want to eradicate Rabies, you have to vaccinate every dog, bat, raccoon, and fox on the planet—which is a logistical nightmare bordering on the impossible. Smallpox was an "obligate human pathogen." It needed us to survive. Without a hidden refuge in the animal kingdom, it was vulnerable. This is the same reason why Dracunculiasis (Guinea worm disease) is currently on the verge of being the next to go, although it has hit a snag because researchers recently discovered it can infect dogs, which has slowed the finish line considerably. It’s a frustrating game of biological whack-a-mole where the moles have started hiding in the neighbor's yard.

Beyond Humans: The Eradication of Rinderpest

While we usually focus on human suffering, we have actually eradicated one other major disease: Rinderpest. This wasn't a human ailment, but a viral plague that decimated cattle, buffalo, and giraffes for centuries. It was the "Smallpox of the grasslands." In the 1890s, a Rinderpest outbreak in Africa was so severe that it killed 90% of the cattle, leading to widespread famine that killed a third of the human population in Ethiopia. As a result: the veterinary world mobilized. In 2011, the World Organisation for Animal Health declared Rinderpest officially eradicated. This is a massive data point often overlooked in the discussion of which disease does not exist anymore, proving that we can apply the same "search and destroy" tactics to the pathogens that feed on our food supply.

The Cattle Plague and Its Lingering Ghost

The Rinderpest virus was closely related to the Measles virus. In fact, many scientists believe that Measles originally evolved from Rinderpest when humans started living in close quarters with domesticated cattle thousands of years ago. By killing Rinderpest, we didn't just save cows; we stabilized entire economies in developing nations. Yet, just like Smallpox, Rinderpest samples are still kept in labs. This brings up a chilling thought: if a disease is "gone" but its DNA is in a freezer, is it actually dead, or just in a state of suspended animation? And what happens if someone decides to thaw it out? The issue remains that our greatest biological victories are only as permanent as our ability to keep those freezers locked.

Comparing the Vanquished to the Lingering: Polio vs. Smallpox

We have been "on the verge" of eradicating Polio for decades. In 1988, there were 350,000 cases a year; today, the numbers are often in the double digits, confined to a few rugged regions in Pakistan and Afghanistan. But Polio is a much sneakier opponent than Smallpox ever was. For every one person paralyzed by Polio, hundreds of others are infected and spreading the virus without showing a single symptom. Smallpox was loud; you knew who had it because they were covered in unmistakable pustules. Polio is a ghost that travels through water and waste, making the "containment" part of the strategy a nightmare. Which explains why, despite billions of dollars and the heroics of health workers, it still hasn't joined the list of which disease does not exist anymore.

The Persistence of the Plague and Other Ancient Horrors

People often confuse "rare" with "non-existent." Take the Bubonic Plague (Yersinia pestis). You might think it died out with the Middle Ages, but it’s still very much alive in the American Southwest and parts of Madagascar. Because it lives in fleas and rodents, we can't get rid of it without destroying entire ecosystems. Then there is the "Sweating Sickness" that vanished in 1551. It just stopped. No vaccine, no modern medicine—it just disappeared from the historical record. Was it a hantavirus? A form of flu? We don't know. This highlights the irony that while we pride ourselves on "defeating" Smallpox, nature sometimes retires its own players without our help at all.

Common fallacies and the ghost of Smallpox

You probably think a disease vanishes the moment the last patient stops coughing, but the reality is far more bureaucratic and dangerous. Many people conflate clinical elimination with global eradication, yet the distinction is massive. Let's be clear: a virus can be absent from your neighborhood while still simmering in a laboratory freezer in Siberia or Atlanta. When we ask which disease does not exist anymore, the only honest answer is Variola major. Smallpox was declared dead in 1980 by the World Health Assembly after a decade of aggressive "ring vaccination" led by the WHO. But wait. Is it actually gone if we keep live samples for research? This is where the misconception thrives because we have traded a natural threat for a potential security breach. If someone accidentally smashed a vial tomorrow, the world would have zero natural immunity.

The Polio paradox

Another frequent error involves Polio. We see the headlines and assume it has joined the list of extinct pathogens, except that it hasn't quite crossed the finish line. Wild poliovirus type 1 still clings to existence in pockets of Afghanistan and Pakistan. We are tantalizingly close to a world where this specific paralysis-inducing disease does not exist anymore, but close counts for nothing in epidemiology. Because the virus can circulate silently in water supplies, as a result: one missed vaccination campaign can undo twenty years of progress. The data proves the fragility of this status; in 1988, there were 350,000 cases annually, compared to fewer than 30 wild cases in recent years.

Confusion with the Plague

The Black Death is often cited as a relic of the past, yet it remains a persistent biological reality in the American West and Madagascar. It didn't disappear; we just got better at killing the bacteria with streptomycin and tetracycline. People often mistake a "rare" condition for an "extinct" one. Does it matter if Yersinia pestis is still lurking in prairie dogs? To the three people who catch it in New Mexico every year, it certainly does. In short, the public often confuses medical mastery with total biological annihilation.

The hidden risk: Permafrost and forgotten vials

The problem is that our definition of "extinct" ignores the cryosphere. As global temperatures rise, we are facing the unfreezing of ancient pathogens that have been locked in Siberian permafrost for millennia. Could an ancient disease that does not exist anymore in the modern record suddenly wake up? Researchers found a 30,000-year-old "Pithovirus" in 2014 that was still infectious to amoebas after thawing. While that specific giant virus doesn't hunt humans, the precedent is terrifying. We are effectively living on a graveyard of dormant biological threats. (And yes, the irony of digging up our own demise while looking for oil is not lost on the scientific community).

Expert advice on vigilance

We must pivot our focus from celebrating past victories to funding genomic surveillance. It is not enough to say a disease does not exist anymore; we must prove it hasn't mutated into something unrecognizable. My strong position is that we are currently underfunding the tracking of zoonotic spillovers by a factor of ten. Yet, we spend billions on reactive measures once a pandemic has already shattered the global supply chain. If you want to ensure a pathogen stays dead, you have to watch its cousins in the animal kingdom with unblinking scrutiny.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Rinderpest virus completely gone from the planet?

Yes, Rinderpest is the second and only other disease that does not exist anymore in the wild, having been declared eradicated in 2011. This cattle plague killed millions of livestock for centuries, causing massive famines and economic collapse. The final blow was a coordinated global effort using a heat-stable vaccine developed by Dr. Walter Plowright. Data shows that before its demise, Rinderpest caused an estimated $1 billion in annual losses in Africa alone. Today, its absence is a triumph for food security and veterinary science.

Could Smallpox ever return through synthetic biology?

But could a lab-grown version restart the fire? The issue remains that the genetic sequence of Smallpox is public knowledge, meaning a sophisticated actor could theoretically synthesize the virus from scratch. This is no longer the stuff of science fiction, as researchers in 2017 synthesized the extinct Horsepox virus for just $100,000 using mail-order DNA. We are in a race between our ability to censor dangerous data and the plummeting cost of gene synthesis technology. This means "eradicated" is no longer a permanent state, but a constant maintenance task for global security.

What about Dracunculiasis, also known as Guinea Worm?

We are currently witnessing the agonizingly slow death of the Guinea Worm. In 1986, there were an estimated 3.5 million cases across 20 countries in Africa and Asia. By 2023, the Carter Center reported that the number of human cases had plummeted to only 13 individuals. This is a staggering achievement because it was done without a vaccine or medicine, relying entirely on nylon water filters and education. Which explains why experts are hopeful that this will be the third human disease that does not exist anymore within the next few years.

The final verdict on biological permanence

We like to think of our victories over nature as permanent monuments, but they are more like sandcastles against a rising tide. Declaring that a disease does not exist anymore is an act of supreme human arrogance that ignores the evolutionary tenacity of microbes. We have deleted Smallpox and Rinderpest, which is a magnificent feat of cooperation, yet we remain vulnerable to the ghosts in the ice and the errors of the lab. Let's be clear: eradication is a temporary truce, not a total conquest. Our survival depends not on the memory of what we killed, but on the unrelenting vigilance we apply to the pathogens still waiting in the wings. Why do we celebrate the end of one virus while ignoring the birth of a thousand new ones? The battle for a disease-free world is a treadmill, and we cannot afford to stop running.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.