YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
barcelona  career  defenders  defensive  football  forward  leadership  league  passing  rarely  ronaldo  systems  weakness  weaknesses  winger  
LATEST POSTS

What Weaknesses Does Messi Have – And Are They Even Real?

We’re conditioned to dissect athletes, to find cracks in the armor. With Messi, that search becomes almost philosophical. Is it fair to call something a weakness if it’s only exposed once every 50 games? If it’s masked by sheer intelligence? That’s where it gets interesting.

The Physical Profile: How Messi’s Build Shapes His Game

Let’s be clear about this — Messi isn’t built like a prototypical forward. At 5'7" and roughly 148 pounds during his Barça peak, he never relied on power. That changes everything. You won’t see him bully defenders off the ball, win aerial duels, or shrug off challenges in tight spaces like Haaland or Lewandowski. His lack of vertical strength means he can be dispossessed when pressed high by physically dominant midfielders. Remember Athletic Bilbao’s tactics under Marcelo Bielsa in 2011–12? They targeted him with two-man traps — Ander Herrera and Javi Martínez, both bigger, stronger — and forced errors. It worked. For a while.

And yet, his low center of gravity turned that same frame into an advantage. He glides through tackles like water through fingers. That’s not just skill — it’s biomechanics. But because he doesn’t dominate physically, he avoids confrontations. You’ll rarely see him hold up play with his back to goal for long stretches. He’s not a target man. Never has been. Never will be. That’s not a failure — it’s a design choice. The system bends around him, and that’s exactly what Barcelona did for over a decade.

I find this overrated, honestly — the idea that his physique is a "flaw." It’s more like a trade-off. Like choosing agility over armor in a video game. You gain evasion, lose durability.

Defensive Contribution: Does Messi Track Back Enough?

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: Messi isn’t known for his defensive work rate. In a 4-3-3 under Guardiola, he was often the furthest forward — a free-roaming number 10 hybrid. His job wasn’t to press from the front but to receive between lines. But in systems demanding high pressing — Klopp’s Liverpool, for instance — that creates imbalance. If the front three don’t all commit, the shape collapses.

Data from Opta shows Messi averaged just 3.2 defensive actions per 90 minutes in La Liga (2010–2020), compared to Mohamed Salah’s 7.8 in the Premier League over a similar span. That’s a gap. In Paris Saint-Germain, under Thomas Tuchel, this became a tactical headache. They needed him to press, but he didn’t — not consistently. And that’s not laziness. It’s preservation. He’s conserving energy for key moments, and we’re far from it in demanding the same output as a 23-year-old winger.

Pace and Acceleration: Was He Ever Truly Fast?

People don’t think about this enough — Messi isn’t a sprinter. His top speed? Around 20.7 mph, according to FIFA fitness tests in 2014. That’s not slow, but it’s not elite. Usain Bolt hits 27.8. Adama Traoré? Closer to 22. What made Messi dangerous wasn’t raw speed but *explosiveness*. His first three steps? Among the quickest ever. He could go from 0 to lethal in a blink. But beyond 20 meters? Defenders could catch him — if they had space and time.

Which explains why he thrived in tight areas and struggled — relatively — on breakaways after age 30. In MLS, you see it now. Occasionally, a younger defender like Djordje Mihailovic (CF Montréal, 2023) outsprinted him in transition. Not humiliating, but noticeable. The thing is, he adjusted. His passing improved. His timing. He became more cerebral. So yes, he lost pace — but not effectiveness.

Leadership Style: Quiet Genius or Lacking Fire?

Compare Messi to a captain like Roy Keane or Sergio Ramos. There’s no screaming. No shirt-pulling. No public dressing-downs. His leadership is internal. He leads by doing. And that’s exactly where critics get confused. In Argentina’s 2014 World Cup final, he barely spoke. No rallying cry. Just a quiet presence. They lost. In 2021, Copa América final? Same demeanor. But they won. So which version is real?

The issue remains — charisma doesn’t always equal impact. He doesn’t need to shout to inspire. Neymar said it best: "When Leo runs, we all run." That’s leadership, just not the Hollywood version. But because it’s subtle, people question it. Especially in Anglo football culture, where passion is often measured by volume. And that’s a bias worth acknowledging.

Because leadership isn’t one-size-fits-all. Some light fires. Others are the fire.

Handling Criticism: Emotional Resilience Under Pressure

Let’s talk about 2016. Messi missed a penalty in the Copa América final shootout against Chile. Argentina lost. Again. He announced his international retirement days later. Said he couldn’t handle the weight. That was a breaking point — and fair game for scrutiny. Could he handle the emotional load of being Argentina’s savior?

But then came 2019, 2021, 2022. Trophies. Redemption. A World Cup win. He matured. The pain shaped him. So while early-career Messi buckled under expectation, the later version absorbed it like a sponge. Experts disagree on whether this was personal growth or better support systems — therapists, family, teammates. Honestly, it is unclear. But the arc is undeniable.

Playmaking vs. Finishing: Where Does He Add Most Value?

Some argue he’s more effective as a false nine than a pure winger. Take 2014–15 Barcelona: 43 goals, 28 assists. As a central forward, he was both scorer and creator. Move him wide — like under Luis Enrique or Mauricio Pochettino — and his goal numbers dip slightly. In PSG’s 2022–23 season, he dropped to 16 goals but climbed to 16 assists. More service, less scoring.

That said, his final third decision-making isn’t always optimal. Occasionally, he holds the ball too long. Waits for the perfect pass when a shot would’ve been better. Watch the 2019 Champions League semi vs. Liverpool. That turnover in the second leg? He tried to thread a needle where a simpler option existed. And that cost them. Hence, his reliance on systems where others — Iniesta, Busquets, Xavi — balanced his tendencies.

Clutch Performance: Does He Elevate in Big Games?

Sure, he’s scored in World Cups, Champions League finals, Clásicos. But critics point to dry spells: no goals in four Champions League finals until 2023 (with Inter Miami?), inconsistency in knockouts post-2015. Except that, his record is still absurd. 48 UCL goals in elimination rounds — more than Ronaldo. And in finals? 2 goals, 3 assists. Not barren.

It’s a bit like judging a painter only by their last canvas. Context matters. When Barcelona’s midfield aged, he carried more. When PSG lacked cohesion, he adapted. His performance curve isn’t linear — but then, genius rarely is.

Set-Piece Limitations: Why He Rarely Takes Penalties Anymore

Wait — he used to take nearly all penalties at Barça. Over 130 in his career. But free kicks? Different story. He stopped attempting most from distance after 2018. Why? His dip-and-curve technique relies on precision, not power. As defenders improved positioning and wall coordination, success rate dropped. From 2010–2015: 1 goal every 8 attempts. After 2018: 1 every 17.

As a result: he stepped back. Let others — Suárez, Griezmann, Mbappé — take them. Smart, not weak. Recognizing diminishing returns. In short, he optimized.

Playing Style vs. Ronaldo: A Measured Comparison

Messi vs Ronaldo — the eternal debate. Ronaldo thrives in transitions, aerial duels, and rigid structures. Messi excels in chaos, tight zones, and fluid systems. Ronaldo adapts to teams. Messi reshapes them. Neither is better. Just different.

But because Messi requires specific tactical architecture — a Busquets to recycle, an Alba overlapping — he’s less plug-and-play than Ronaldo. At Juventus, CR7 adapted to Italian defense-first football. Messi’s PSG stint? Rockier. They had to reconfigure everything. That’s not a flaw. It’s a consequence of playing at the highest level of improvisation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Messi Weak Defensively?

Not weak — just different. He doesn’t track back like a winger in a 4-4-2. But in a fluid front three, his positioning disrupts passing lanes intelligently. It’s passive pressure, not active chasing. And in modern analytics, that still counts.

Why Doesn’t Messi Jump for Headers?

Simple: he’s 5'7". He could train all day and still lose to 6'2" center-backs. So he doesn’t waste energy. Instead, he anticipates. Cuts off crosses before they’re played. Smarter than stronger.

Did Age Affect Messi’s Weaknesses?

Of course. By 35, his recovery speed dropped. But his passing accuracy rose to 92.3% in MLS (2023), up from 89.1% in 2019. He traded burst for brain. Evolution, not decline.

The Bottom Line

Messi has weaknesses. He’s not strong. Not fast over distance. Not vocal. Not a defensive dynamo. But to call these flaws is to miss the point. Greatness isn’t the absence of limits — it’s the mastery of working within them. He turned constraints into art. And if that’s a weakness, then maybe we need to redefine what strength really means.

Because in the end, the only thing Messi can’t do is be someone else. And thank God for that.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.