YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
collisions  contact  football  injuries  injury  kicker  kickers  offensive  players  position  positions  punters  safest  safety  you're  
LATEST POSTS

What Position Is Safest in Football?

Defining "Safety" in Football

When we talk about safety in football, we're really weighing several factors: the frequency of high-impact collisions, exposure to dangerous tackling situations, and the likelihood of chronic injuries like concussions or joint damage. Some positions are designed to avoid direct contact, while others seem to invite it at every snap.

The safest position isn't necessarily the one with zero contact—it's the one where contact is infrequent, controlled, and less likely to result in catastrophic injury. This already eliminates positions like running back, linebacker, and safety, where players are constantly engaged in high-speed collisions.

The Kicker: Football's Most Protected Position?

If there's one position that stands out for safety, it's the kicker. Think about it: kickers spend most of their time on the sideline, sprinting onto the field for a single play, then sprinting off again. During those few seconds of action, they're rarely targeted by defenders—in fact, roughing the kicker is a 15-yard penalty and automatic first down.

Professional kickers like Justin Tucker and Harrison Butker have careers spanning over a decade with remarkably few injuries. Their biggest physical risks? Overuse injuries from repetitive kicking motion, not violent collisions. The numbers back this up: kickers have the lowest injury rates of any position group in the NFL, with concussion rates near zero.

But here's the catch—being a kicker means you're only on the field for a handful of plays each game. Is that really "playing football" in the traditional sense? Some would argue it's more like being a specialist who happens to wear a football uniform.

Punter: A Close Second

Punters share many of the same safety advantages as kickers. They're on the field infrequently, protected by rules against roughing, and rarely involved in physical confrontations. The main difference? Punters sometimes have to make tackles on punt returns, which introduces a small but real risk of injury.

Still, when you look at career longevity, punters like Shane Lechler (who played until age 41) demonstrate that this position can be remarkably sustainable. The repetitive motion of punting does create some lower back and hip issues over time, but these are chronic rather than acute injuries.

The Quarterback Question

Quarterbacks might seem like obvious candidates for the safest position—after all, they're protected by numerous rules and often operate in a clean pocket. But here's where it gets complicated: when quarterbacks do get hit, it's often by the biggest, fastest defenders on the field, and those hits can be devastating.

Players like Tom Brady and Peyton Manning had remarkably healthy careers, but that's more about skill and awareness than position safety. For every Drew Brees, there's a Joe Theismann—a reminder that quarterback injuries, while less frequent, can be career-ending when they occur.

Offensive Lineman: The Surprising Contender

Here's a position you might not expect: offensive lineman. While they engage in contact on virtually every play, the nature of that contact is different. Linemen are essentially pushing against each other rather than delivering bone-crushing hits. The collisions are controlled, predictable, and involve similar-sized players.

The downside? The cumulative effect of thousands of these smaller impacts may contribute to long-term brain health issues, even if individual plays don't result in obvious injuries. It's a classic case of chronic versus acute risk.

Wide Receiver: Speed Without the Punishment

Wide receivers run fast and make spectacular catches, but they're actually involved in relatively few violent collisions compared to other positions. When they do get hit, it's often by players moving in the same direction rather than head-on collisions.

The key is that receivers who can create separation and avoid contact tend to have longer careers. Think of players like Larry Fitzgerald, who modified his game as he aged to prioritize longevity over highlight-reel collisions.

Special Teams: The Hidden Danger Zone

Before we crown any position as "safest," we need to talk about special teams. Players who participate in kick and punt coverage are involved in some of the most dangerous plays in football—full-speed collisions between players running in opposite directions.

This is why even positions that seem safe (like backup linebackers who play special teams) can have surprisingly high injury rates. The context of how and when a position is played matters as much as the position itself.

Youth and High School Considerations

At lower levels of play, the safest position calculus changes. In youth football, where players vary dramatically in size and skill, positions that keep players away from the ball (like offensive line) might actually be safer than in the pros.

High school football introduces another variable: specialization. Players who focus on one position rather than playing both ways reduce their overall exposure to injury. This is especially relevant for two-way players who might be exhausted by the fourth quarter, making them more vulnerable.

The Data Doesn't Lie

When researchers analyze injury data across positions, clear patterns emerge. According to NFL injury reports over the past decade, kickers and punters have injury rates approximately 60-70% lower than the league average. Quarterbacks and wide receivers fall somewhere in the middle, while running backs, linebackers, and safeties have the highest rates of both minor and severe injuries.

Concussion rates tell a similar story. Positions involving the most high-speed, high-impact collisions (running back, linebacker, safety) have concussion rates 3-4 times higher than positions like kicker or punter.

Position Longevity: The Ultimate Safety Metric

Maybe the best way to think about position safety is career length. Kickers routinely play 15-20 years in the NFL. Punters often exceed 15 years. Quarterbacks who prioritize protection over heroics can play into their late 30s or early 40s.

Compare that to running backs, who rarely last more than 7-8 years in the league, and you start to see that the safest position might be the one that lets you play the longest while maintaining your quality of life after football.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is being a kicker really "playing football"?

This is a fair question. Kickers contribute crucially to winning games, but they're on the field for maybe 5-10% of the snaps. If your definition of football includes constant physical engagement, then no—kicker isn't really "playing football" in the traditional sense. But if we're talking pure safety, it's hard to argue with the data.

Do offensive linemen get fewer concussions than other positions?

Surprisingly, yes—despite constant contact. The controlled nature of line play, with similar-sized players pushing against each other, results in fewer severe head impacts than positions involving open-field tackles or blocks. However, the cumulative effect of thousands of sub-concussive hits remains a concern.

Which position has the longest average career in the NFL?

Kickers and punters lead the pack, with average careers of 8-10 years (compared to 3-4 years for running backs). Quarterbacks who can stay healthy often play 10-15 years, while most other positions see careers of 5-7 years at most.

Are some positions safer at certain levels of play?

Absolutely. In youth football, positions that minimize mismatches (like offensive line) might be safer. In high school, specialization reduces risk. In college and pro, the safest positions are those with the least exposure to high-speed collisions—primarily kicking positions.

Verdict: The Safest Position in Football

After weighing all the factors—injury rates, concussion data, career longevity, and the nature of contact—the kicker emerges as the safest position in football. It's not even particularly close. Punters run a very close second, with offensive linemen as a surprising third-place contender.

But here's the thing: being a kicker means you're only tangentially involved in what most people consider "football." You're a specialist, protected by rules, and only on the field for brief moments. If you want to be in the thick of the action while still minimizing risk, offensive lineman might be your best bet—you're engaged in every play, but the contact is controlled rather than explosive.

The reality is that football, by its nature, involves risk. The safest approach might be choosing a position that matches your physical attributes while understanding that no position is truly "safe." Whether you're a kicker who rarely gets touched or a lineman who gets touched on every snap, the goal should be playing smart, using proper technique, and knowing when to protect yourself.

After all, the best position is the one that lets you enjoy the game today while still being able to walk away from it tomorrow.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.