YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
career  chamberlain  doesn't  minutes  modern  played  players  points  scored  scoring  season  that's  there's  warriors  wasn't  
LATEST POSTS

Who scored 73 points in a game?

Was 73 points Wilt Chamberlain's best performance?

Not even close. The 73-point game came during the 1961-62 season, which was arguably the most dominant individual campaign in NBA history. Chamberlain averaged 50.4 points and 25.7 rebounds per game that year. The 73-point outing was impressive, sure, but it was just another Tuesday for him. He had already dropped 78 points against the Lakers earlier that season and would go on to score 100 in a game just a few weeks later. The thing is, we're talking about a player who treated scoring like a casual stroll. He once said he could've averaged 100 points per game if he really wanted to. And honestly? I believe him.

How does 73 points compare to other legendary scoring nights?

It stacks up, but it doesn't top the list. Kobe Bryant's 81-point game in 2006 is the modern benchmark. David Thompson scored 73 once too, back in 1978. But Chamberlain did it multiple times—six games of 70+ points in his career. The difference is the era. In the early '60s, defenses were slower, rotations were nonexistent, and Chamberlain was a physical marvel playing against guys who smoked at halftime. That doesn't diminish the feat—it just puts it in context. You can't compare eras directly, but you can appreciate the dominance within them.

What made Chamberlain capable of scoring 73 points?

Size, skill, and stamina. Chamberlain was 7'1" with a 7'8" wingspan, but he wasn't just a big body. He was athletic, coordinated, and had a jump shot that extended beyond the free-throw line. The Warriors built their offense around getting him the ball, and he could score from anywhere—dunks, layups, hooks, mid-range. And he did it for 48 minutes a game. No rest. No breaks. Modern players complain about back-to-backs, but Chamberlain played 48.5 minutes per game that season. That's not a typo. He literally played almost every minute.

Did anyone else come close to 73 points in a game?

A few have flirted with it. David Robinson scored 71 in 1994. Elgin Baylor had a 71-point game in 1960. Devin Booker scored 70 in 2017. Damian Lillard dropped 71 in 2023. But 73? That's rarefied air. Only Chamberlain, Bryant, and Thompson have done it. And here's the kicker: Chamberlain did it three times. The man was a scoring machine in a way the league has never seen since. Even today's offensive explosions—while impressive—don't touch what he did on a regular basis.

Why don't we hear about the 73-point game as much as the 100-point game?

Because 100 is a rounder number. It's cleaner. It's the kind of stat that sticks in your head. Seventy-three is great, but it doesn't have the same ring. Plus, the 100-point game had more drama—Chamberlain scored his final basket with seconds left, and the Warriors practically fouled to get the ball back. There's footage, there's mythology, there's the iconic photo of him holding up a "100" sign. The 73-point game? It's buried in the box scores, remembered mostly by historians and die-hard fans. But make no mistake—it was just as dominant.

Could anyone score 73 points in today's NBA?

Maybe, but it would take a perfect storm. The game is faster, defenses are smarter, and no one plays 48 minutes anymore. Even the most prolific scorers sit out quarters. But if a player like Luka Dončić, Devin Booker, or Kevin Durant got hot, faced a bad defensive matchup, and played extended minutes in an overtime game? It's not impossible. The offensive rules favor scorers now more than ever. But sustaining that for an entire game? That's the hard part. Chamberlain didn't just score 73—he did it while grabbing 32 rebounds. Try doing that against modern athletes.

What was the reaction at the time?

People were amazed, but not shocked. Chamberlain doing something ridiculous was par for the course. The Warriors knew they had a once-in-a-lifetime talent, and the league was still figuring out how to handle him. There were calls to widen the lane, change defensive rules, even suggestions that he was bad for the game because he made everyone else look irrelevant. But the fans loved it. They came to see him score, and he delivered every night. The 73-point game was a headline, but it wasn't the story of the season—that was the 100-point game.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Wilt Chamberlain score 73 points more than once?

No, the 73-point game happened once. But he scored 70 or more points in a game six times in his career. Three of those were in the same season (1961-62). So while 73 was a one-off, he was routinely putting up numbers that would be unthinkable today.

Who was the opposing team when Chamberlain scored 73?

The Chicago Packers, who would later become the Baltimore Bullets. They were a struggling expansion team that season, which certainly helped Chamberlain's cause. But even against good teams, he was unstoppable. It wasn't just weak opposition—it was him being on another level.

How many shots did Chamberlain take to score 73 points?

He attempted 60 shots and made 36. He also made 25 of 32 free throws, which is notable because he was a poor free-throw shooter (career 51%). That night, he was efficient and relentless. To put it in perspective, most players today don't attempt 60 shots in three games combined.

The Bottom Line

Wilt Chamberlain scoring 73 points in a game is one of those feats that gets overshadowed by even bigger numbers, but it's no less remarkable. It's a window into an era of basketball that was raw, physical, and dominated by a singular force of nature. Could it happen today? Maybe. But it would take a perfect confluence of circumstances, talent, and stamina. Chamberlain didn't need perfection—he just needed a basketball and 48 minutes. And that's exactly what makes it so incredible.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.