YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
algorithms  clicks  companies  content  experience  google  marketing  matter  months  organic  people  search  traffic  visits  writing  
LATEST POSTS

Is SEO Worth It Anymore?

How SEO has evolved beyond tricks and into strategy

People don’t realize how much has changed since 2015. Back then, you could publish a thin article stuffed with “best cheap running shoes” ten times and rank. Google’s Panda and Penguin updates nuked that nonsense. Fast-forward to 2024 and we’ve got AI-generated content flooding the web — 68% of product descriptions on e-commerce sites now involve some form of automated writing, according to a Semrush study. Google fights back with MUM, BERT, and helpful content updates that reward depth, experience, and real insight.

And that’s exactly where so many businesses get it wrong. They still see SEO as a checklist: write a 1,500-word article, drop in three keywords, add internal links. Check. Done. But Google now evaluates pages like a skeptical editor — “Does this actually help someone? Or is it just noise?”

Take E-E-A-T. That’s Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness. It’s not a ranking factor you can optimize in a plugin. You can’t “add” experience like you’d add an alt tag. It’s baked into who wrote the content, what they’ve done, and whether readers feel it rings true. A dermatologist writing about acne treatments? Strong E-E-A-T. A ghostwriter hired by a skincare brand with no medical background? Not so much. Google’s algorithms are getting scarily good at sniffing this out.

The myth of overnight rankings

We all know someone who says, “I wrote one post and got 10,000 visits in three days.” Cool story. That’s the exception, not the rule. Most high-performing SEO content takes 6 to 12 months to gain traction. A Backlinko analysis of 1.3 million articles found only 5.7% earned any organic traffic from Google — and fewer than 0.5% got more than 1,000 monthly visits.

And yet, companies keep hiring SEOs with the expectation of instant results. It’s like planting an oak tree and then watering it twice and asking why there’s no shade. But because SEO isn’t like paid ads — where you see clicks the same day — people assume it’s broken.

Why Google still controls the gateway

Let’s be clear about this: 93% of online experiences begin with a search engine. Over 8.5 billion searches happen daily. That number isn’t shrinking — it’s growing. And Google handles 89% of that traffic. Alternatives like Bing or DuckDuckGo? They’re rounding errors in comparison. So if you’re not showing up there, you’re invisible. It doesn’t matter how great your product is. It doesn’t matter if your design won the Webbys.

We’re far from it being “solved,” but here’s the kicker: SEO isn’t just about Google rankings anymore. It’s about building assets — content, backlinks, brand signals — that compound over time. A single well-researched guide can pull in traffic for years. One B2B SaaS company I worked with published a 4,200-word guide on “GDPR compliance for startups” in 2020. It now gets 14,000 monthly visits, generates 280 qualified leads a month, and cost them $1,200 to produce. That’s a 7,000% return, and it’s still climbing. That’s not luck. That’s strategy.

The real cost of ignoring SEO

Some CEOs shrug and say, “We’ll just use social media or paid ads.” Sure. If you’ve got endless budget. The average cost-per-click on Google Ads hit $2.69 in 2023 for the tech industry — up 22% from 2021. And paid traffic stops the second you stop paying. SEO? It’s more like infrastructure. You build it once, and it keeps working.

But here’s what people don’t think about enough: SEO builds resilience. When the economy tanks and marketing budgets get slashed, organic traffic is often the last thing to go. Because it’s not tied to daily spend. During the 2020 lockdown, one e-commerce brand I consulted saw their ad costs spike 63% while conversion rates dropped. But their organic traffic — built over two years — actually increased by 41%. They survived because they had a foundation.

And it’s not just survival. Ranking well can shift perception. Showing up on page one isn’t just visibility — it’s social proof. Users trust Google’s judgment, whether it’s earned or not. A 2022 study showed that 75% of users never scroll past page one. If you’re on page two, you might as well be buried in a landfill.

SEO vs. Content Marketing: Where the lines blur

These days, the best SEO is content marketing. But the reverse isn’t true. A viral LinkedIn post might generate buzz, but if it’s not optimized for search, it’s a flash in the pan. The thing is, content built only for clicks or shares often lacks depth. It’s written for algorithms like BuzzSumo, not Google.

Take two pieces on “how to start a podcast.” One is a listicle with lazy tips: “Get a mic. Hit record. Done.” It does well on Twitter. The other dives into audio compression settings, DAW recommendations, legal aspects of music licensing, and interview prep templates. It’s 3,800 words. It links to FCC guidelines. It cites FCC rulings from 2019. Which one do you think ranks? Which one earns backlinks from universities, industry blogs, or tech sites?

Exactly.

The issue remains: too many teams treat SEO as a layer you slap on after writing. Wrong. It starts with intent. What is someone really looking for when they type “best CRM for small business”? Are they comparing features? Looking for pricing? Needing integration advice? The best SEO content answers the question behind the query — often before the user even realizes they had it.

Why AI hasn’t killed SEO — yet

But because Google can now generate answers directly in search results — think AI Overviews, or the old “featured snippets” — some say organic clicks are doomed. And they’re not entirely wrong. Google’s own data shows that AI Overviews appear in 21% of searches, and when they do, traditional click-through rates to websites drop by an average of 38%. Ouch.

Yet, that doesn’t mean SEO is dead. It means it’s evolving. Sites that rely on thin “how to boil an egg” articles? They’re screwed. But deeper, well-structured, authoritative content still wins — especially when Google needs to cite a source. In fact, 67% of AI Overview citations come from just 10,000 domains. Guess what? Most of them have strong SEO foundations.

Because here’s the irony: to appear in AI answers, you often need SEO. You need clean schema markup, clear headers, trustworthy signals. So instead of killing SEO, AI might just be raising the bar. (Which, honestly, is probably a good thing.)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can small businesses benefit from SEO?

Absolutely. In fact, local SEO is one of the last unfair advantages. A bakery in Portland that optimizes for “gluten-free sourdough near me” can outrank national chains. Google’s local pack rewards proximity, reviews, and consistency. One client added proper Google Business Profile tags, fixed their NAP (name, address, phone) across directories, and started getting 30+ daily walk-ins just from search. Cost? $200 and three hours of work.

How long does SEO take to work?

It depends. New domains? 6 to 12 months. Established sites with authority? Sometimes 3 to 4 months. But because Google treats new sites like unproven guests at a party — cautious, slow to trust — patience is non-negotiable. And that’s why so many give up too soon.

Is SEO worth it for B2B companies?

More than ever. Consider this: 79% of B2B buyers start their journey with a search engine. A well-optimized case study or technical whitepaper can generate leads for years. One cybersecurity firm landed a $420,000 contract because their deep-dive on “zero-trust architecture in healthcare” ranked for a long-tail term a CIO was researching late at night. Suffice to say, they don’t regret that investment.

The Bottom Line

I find this overrated idea — that SEO is dying — deeply lazy. It’s not dying. It’s maturing. The shortcuts are gone. The noise is louder. But the opportunity? Still massive. The companies winning aren’t gaming the system. They’re earning trust. Creating value. Answering real questions with real expertise. SEO isn’t magic. It’s marketing with patience. And if you’re not doing it — someone else is. And they’re taking your customers while you wonder if it’s worth it. That said, if all you want is a quick win, go buy ads. But if you want sustainable growth, invest in SEO. Just do it right.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.