YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
aggressive  coverage  defense  defensive  football  league  linebackers  modern  offenses  passing  players  pressure  receiver  safeties  tackle  
LATEST POSTS

Why Doesn’t Anyone Use the 46 Defense Anymore?

Let’s be clear about this: the thing is, football isn’t played the same way it was in 1985. That changes everything.

The Origins and Mechanics of the 46 Defense

Invented by Buddy Ryan with the Chicago Bears, the 46 defense packed eight men near the line of scrimmage—six on the line, two linebackers just behind—designed to bury the quarterback before he even blinked. Its name came from Doug Plank’s jersey number, the safety who lined up unnervingly close to the tackle. This wasn’t just aggressive; it was psychological warfare. You’d look across the field and see a wall. A snarling, gap-filling, chaos-spreading wall. And that’s exactly where most modern offenses now have the answer.

The formation relied on distortion: shifting the defensive line, overloading one side, forcing the offense to account for pressure from blind spots. Ryan didn’t care about balance—he wanted asymmetry. The defense often used a 5-2 look with a nose tackle shading the center, two defensive tackles, two defensive ends, and a fifth lineman—sometimes a linebacker—lined up outside the tight end. The linebackers, particularly Otis Wilson and Wilber Marshall, were free to blitz or drop based on reads. But the core idea was always the same: crush the pocket with numbers, regardless of coverage risks.

That said, it only worked because the Bears had freak athletes. Richard Dent. Dan Hampton. Steve McMichael. Players who could win one-on-one battles even when schemes exposed them. You can’t build that defense without that personnel.

How the 46 Defense Altered Offensive Strategy in the 1980s

The Bears’ 1985 defense allowed just 12.4 points per game—still the best in modern NFL history. They forced 64 turnovers. They weren’t just good; they were terrifying. Offenses across the league started adjusting: more shotgun, quicker drops, three-step drops, and screens became staples not because they were trendy, but because they were survival tactics. Coaches realized if you didn’t get the ball out fast, your quarterback was getting launched into next week.

The Personnel Demands: Why It Was Never Replicable at Scale

You need a rare combination: dominant defensive tackles who can control two gaps, edge rushers with closing speed, and safeties who can function as hybrid linebackers. The Bears had all three. Most teams don’t. Even rebuilding that look today with modern players fails—because today’s safeties don’t tackle like Plank, and defensive tackles aren’t asked to occupy three blockers at once anymore. That kind of physical demand is almost extinct. And because offensive linemen are bigger, faster, and smarter about slide protections, sending constant pressure without exotic stunts just gets gashed.

How Modern Passing Games Exposed the 46 Defense

Spread concepts. Motion. Three-wide receiver sets. Trips formations. These aren’t just new wrinkles—they’ve rewritten the rulebook. The 46 defense traditionally left only three defensive backs in coverage: two corners and a safety. That means when an offense lines up with four or five receivers? You’re fundamentally outnumbered. And even if you rotate a linebacker into coverage, you’re asking a 240-pound run defender to stay with a 190-pound slot receiver on a crossing route. Good luck.

Let’s put it in perspective: in 1985, teams averaged 54.3 pass attempts per game across the league. By 2023, that number jumped to 68.7. And the average time from snap to throw dropped from 2.8 seconds to 2.3. That 0.5-second gap is the difference between pressure and pancakes. Quarterbacks like Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen, and Joe Burrow don’t wait—they’re reading progressions before the ball is even snapped. And they’re throwing from unorthodox arm angles, on the move, against disguised coverages. The 46 defense doesn’t adapt to that—it collapses under it.

Because coverage shells are stressed beyond capacity, the backend breaks down. Corners get isolated. Safeties get pulled in two directions. And once one receiver is single-covered, the math shifts. The offense has a numbers advantage. One-on-one matchups favor receivers more often than not. That’s why we see more Cover-3, Cover-4, and pattern-matching zones today—they’re built for volume, not force.

The Rise of the Quick Game and RPOs

Play-action used to be about selling the run to open deep shots. Now? It’s a tool for quick throws behind the line. RPOs—run-pass options—turn every run play into a potential pass. The quarterback reads a defender post-snap: if the linebacker steps up, he pulls it and hits the slant. If the corner bails, he hands off. The 46 defense, with its aggressive line stunts and pre-snap declarations, practically begs to be RPO’d. Because its linebackers are often committed before the snap, there’s no one in the short middle. Throws like quick outs, hitches, and bubble screens thrive. And because the 46 relies on pressure, if the ball comes out fast enough, the disruption never happens.

Passing Efficiency Metrics Since 1985: A Data Story

The numbers don’t lie. In 1985, the NFL average passer rating was 67.3. In 2023? It was 90.6. Completion percentage rose from 55.8% to 64.8%. Yards per attempt went from 6.6 to 7.3. Interceptions dropped from 3.2 per 100 attempts to 2.1. That’s not evolution—it’s a revolution. And the 46 defense, built to force mistakes through intimidation, now just forces big plays through vulnerability. You can’t blitz eight and hope someone makes a play when the ball is gone in 1.8 seconds. You’re gambling. And over time, the house always wins.

46 Defense vs. Modern Hybrid Schemes: Why Flexibility Wins

Today’s defenses don’t pick a look and stick with it. They morph. A base 3-4 might shift into a 5-2 pre-snap, then rotate into quarters coverage. The Baltimore Ravens under Mike Macdonald didn’t win with the 46—they won with disguise, movement, and timing. They rushed four, dropped seven, and still generated pressure through creative stunts and delayed blitzes. Their 2023 defense ranked first in points allowed (17.0 per game) and third in sack rate (6.4%). And they did it without ever lining up in true 46 alignment.

Compare that to trying to run the 46 in 2024. You’d be exploited in the slot, vulnerable to screen passes, and overwhelmed by tempo. Because offenses now run up to 80 plays per game at a 15-second snap average, you can’t sustain that level of physical exertion. Players wear down. Assignments get muddy. And that’s exactly where the modern NFL punishes rigidity.

So what replaced it? Multiple front packages, positionless defenders, and hybrid players like Derwin James or Troy Hill—safeties who can rush, cover, and tackle like linebackers. It’s not about one dominant scheme; it’s about having answers for everything. The 46 was a sledgehammer. Today’s defenses are Swiss Army knives.

The Role of Analytics in Defensive Play-Calling

Front offices now employ analytics teams that track everything: down-and-distance win probability, expected points added (EPA) per formation, pressure conversion rates, coverage breakdowns by receiver type. And the data consistently shows that constant eight-man fronts lower defensive efficiency in passing situations. From 2020 to 2023, defenses that rushed six or more players faced 7.8 yards per play when the ball was in the air. When they rushed four, it dropped to 6.1. That’s not a small gap. That’s losing seasons.

Coaching Philosophy Shift: From Dominance to Adaptability

Old-school coaches wanted to impose their will. Modern coordinators want to react faster. The difference is philosophical. You don’t see teams trying to “beat you up” anymore—you see them trying to “stay ahead of you.” It’s chess, not boxing. And honestly, it is unclear whether the NFL will ever return to an era where one defense dominates league-wide. The game’s too diverse, too fast, too adaptive.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the 46 Defense Still Work in College or High School Football?

Sometimes. At lower levels, where offensive linemen are less technically sound and quarterbacks take longer to process, the 46 can still create chaos. But even there, spread systems have diluted its effectiveness. Teams like Alabama or Ohio State don’t run it as a base—they might dial it up on third-and-long, or in short-yardage. As a full-time identity? No. The gaps are too exploitable. And because younger players struggle with coverage assignments, you risk giving up big plays when the pressure misses.

Did Any NFL Team Successfully Revive the 46 in the 2010s?

Not really. The Philadelphia Eagles under Jim Johnson used aggressive fronts that resembled the 46, but they weren’t true 46 looks—they used more coverage disguises and two-high shells. The 2004 Eagles defense, which reached the Super Bowl, blitzed on 38% of dropbacks (highest in the league), yet they didn’t stack eight at the line like the Bears. They used simulated pressures, dropping linemen into coverage or using zone blitzes. It was more sophisticated—and more sustainable.

Is the 46 Defense Completely Extinct?

Not extinct—just dormant. You’ll see echoes of it: overload blitzes, safety blitzes from the line, or eight-in-the-box looks on third-and-short. But as a consistent, identity-driving scheme? No. The last time a team used it as a base was probably the early 1990s. And even then, it was fading. The game changed. That’s football.

The Bottom Line

The 46 defense didn’t fail—it succeeded too well. It pushed offenses to evolve. And once they did, the blueprint became obsolete. You can’t run a 1985 solution on a 2024 problem. The modern passing game is too efficient, too fast, too adaptive. I find this overrated when analysts say, “We need more aggressive defenses.” Aggression isn’t the issue—control is. You can’t sacrifice coverage integrity for pressure and expect to survive 70-play games against Mahomes or Herbert.

And because the NFL is a copycat league, if something works, everyone steals it. The fact that no team has gone all-in on the 46 in decades tells you everything. Data is still lacking on long-term effectiveness, but the market has spoken. Flexibility beats force. Disguise beats declaration. And the ability to answer multiple questions beats shouting one loud answer.

The 46 defense was a masterpiece of its time. But football moves on. And that’s exactly why we love it.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.