YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
baseball  career  exactly  galarraga  hitter  hitting  homers  injury  league  number  passed  players  reached  season  seasons  
LATEST POSTS

Who Hit Exactly 350 Home Runs?

You’d think such a clean round number would belong to a surefire Hall of Famer. We’re far from it.

The 350 Home Run Club: A Gray Area Between Stardom and Obscurity

Reaching 350 home runs means you were feared at the plate for over a decade. You weren’t just a role player. You were a middle-of-the-order bat, the guy pitchers tried to avoid when the game was on the line. Yet, 350 is not 500. It doesn’t guarantee bronze immortality. It doesn’t even guarantee a serious Hall of Fame conversation. That changes everything. And that’s exactly where the 350 mark becomes fascinating—not as a destination, but as a crossroads.

The thing is, most sluggers who get close don’t stop at 350. They either fall short in the 320s or push into the late 300s or beyond. Hitting exactly 350 is like stopping at a toll booth with exact change—you didn’t overshoot, you didn’t underpay. You just… arrived.

Defining the Plateau: What 350 Really Means in Baseball

Think of 350 as the threshold between legend and solid contributor. You’re past the “good power hitter” tier (that’s about 250) and not quite in the “generational slugger” bracket (450+). It’s a number that says consistency, durability, and a knack for staying healthy during prime years. But it also whispers “what if?” What if injury hadn’t cut the career short? What if the league hadn’t changed, favoring pitching over power in that particular era?

There’s no official “350 Home Run Club,” unlike the 500 or 3,000-hit milestones. That absence speaks volumes. It’s respected—but not revered.

Historical Context: When 350 Was a Bigger Deal

In the 1970s and early 80s, before the steroid era inflated home run totals, 350 was a much rarer feat. Only 12 players had done it by 1985. Back then, pitchers dominated, ballparks were larger, and artificial turf limited fly balls. Hitting 30 in a season was headline news. So reaching 350 meant you were among the elite sluggers of your generation—even if you didn’t crack Cooperstown. Fast-forward to 2024, and over 40 players have passed 350. Inflation, much like in economics, has diluted the value.

To give a sense of scale: in 1970, Willie McCovey became the seventh player ever to hit 350. By 2005, it was already the 33rd such achievement. That shift—from scarcity to abundance—rewired how we perceive the milestone.

Andrés Galarraga: The Man Who Landed on 350

Of all the names on the list, Galarraga is the only one widely recognized for finishing at exactly 350. A two-time NL batting champion, a five-time All-Star, and a man who played 19 seasons across four teams—the Expos, Rockies, Braves, and others—Galarraga was a throwback: a pure right-handed hitter with raw, balanced power.

He hit his 350th and final home run on September 15, 2004, as a member of the Atlanta Braves, off Brewers pitcher Dave Bush, a low-and-away fastball he launched into the left-center field seats at Turner Field. Poetic, really—his first homer came in Montreal in 1986 off Charlie Hough. Nearly two decades later, he ended on a similar swing plane, same stance, same quiet confidence.

But here’s the twist: Galarraga almost didn’t get that last one. Diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 2001, he missed the entire 2002 season. Doctors weren’t sure he’d play again. He returned in 2003 with the Angels, hit 18 homers, then added 10 more in 2004. That comeback, against odds no stat sheet can measure, gives his 350 a resonance others lack.

And it wasn’t just the number. It was the timing. The resilience. The refusal to fade quietly.

Because let’s be clear about this: if Galarraga hadn’t gotten sick, he likely finishes with 380, maybe 390. He was on pace for 30-homer seasons through his age-39 year. But cancer interrupted. So 350 isn’t a ceiling—it’s a snapshot. A freeze-frame of a career paused by forces beyond the game.

Other Notable Near-Misses and Statistical Twins

Galarraga is the most famous, but he isn’t alone in hovering near the mark. A few others either ended at 350 or came within a few swings.

Harmon Killebrew: 573, But Once Passed 350 in Style

Yes, Killebrew finished with 573, but in 1967, he became the first player to hit his 350th homer in a season where he also led the league in walks and slugging. That year, he hit 44 bombs for the Twins—a reminder that 350 wasn’t some distant fantasy for the true sluggers. He reached it in his age-31 season. For him, it was merely a midpoint.

But why mention him? Because his trajectory shows how quickly elite hitters blow past 350. Where Galarraga stalled, Killebrew accelerated.

Carlos Delgado: 473, But His 350th Was a Statement

Delgado hit No. 350 on August 19, 2004, as a Blue Jay, off Brad Hennessey of the Giants. A two-run shot to left-center. It came during a season where he hit 32, but his peak was behind him. He’d add 123 more over six seasons. His case is a contrast: 350 was just another stop on a long haul, not the end of the line.

Yet, his approach—patient, disciplined, launch-angle before launch-angle was cool—was similar to Galarraga’s. Two different arcs, same type of hitter.

Wally Joyner: 204, So Why Mention Him?

Wait—204? That’s nowhere near 350. But Joyner was projected to get there. After hitting 20+ homers in five straight seasons (1986–1990), analysts penciled him in for 400+ career bombs. A hip injury in 1991 derailed everything. He bounced around, retired at 38. If he’d stayed healthy, he might have flirted with 350. His story is a cautionary tale: the number isn’t just about talent. It’s about luck. And that’s something we don’t talk about enough.

350 vs 400: Why the Extra 50 Changes the Legacy

There’s a psychological wall at 400. Cross it, and suddenly you’re in “serious power hitter” territory. Look at Jim Thome (612) or Frank Thomas (521)—no one questions their place in the power hierarchy. But 350? It’s respected. It’s not revered.

Take Adrián Beltré. He finished with 477. But imagine if injury had ended his career in 2012—after his 350th. Would he still be a first-ballot Hall of Famer? Maybe not. That extra 127 homers built the narrative. They turned a great career into a legendary one.

And that’s exactly where the gap widens. The 50-homer cushion isn’t just stats—it’s story. It’s dominance. It’s proof you didn’t just reach a level, you owned it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 350 home runs considered a Hall of Fame number?

Not by itself. You need more—RBI, batting average, Gold Gloves, MVPs. Andre Dawson (438) got in, but his peak was monstrous. Willie Stargell (475) had the rings. Galarraga, despite 350 and two batting titles, isn’t in. His case is weakened by a relatively low on-base percentage and only 2,200 hits. The Hall wants signatures, not just strong resumes.

How many players have exactly 350 home runs?

Data is still lacking on exact career totals due to discrepancies in early baseball records, but modern tracking shows only a few landed precisely on 350. Galarraga is the most documented. Tony Pérez is sometimes listed at 350, but official MLB records credit him with 379. Others like Dave Kingman (442) passed it years earlier. So the pool is tiny—possibly just one or two confirmed.

Who was the fastest to 350 home runs?

That title likely belongs to Mark McGwire. He reached 350 in 1997, in his age-33 season, after a 58-homer debut with the Cardinals. He did it in 1,619 games. For context, Galarraga took 2,255. The difference? McGwire was a one-dimensional beast: get on base, then watch him launch. There was no subtlety. But there was speed.

The Bottom Line

So who hit exactly 350? The clearest answer is Andrés Galarraga. But the real story isn’t the number. It’s how he got there—through perseverance, exile, and a comeback that defied medical odds. I find this overrated: the fetishization of round numbers in baseball. 350 isn’t magic. 300 isn’t sacred. What matters is the arc, the fight, the seasons where you showed up despite everything.

And let’s be honest: most fans wouldn’t know 350 from 349 unless it was on a trivia card. But Galarraga’s story sticks. Because it’s not about the total. It’s about the two-year silence, the hospital stays, the swing he rebuilt from scratch.

Others passed 350 like it was a highway mile marker. He arrived at it like a survivor reaching shore.

The problem is, we remember the homers. We don’t remember the chemo.

That said, if you’re asking for a name, a stat, a box-score answer—Galarraga is your man. But the deeper truth? Hitting exactly 350 isn’t a feat. It’s a footnote. Unless, of course, you know the rest of the story.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.