YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
agents  automated  automation  complex  disappear  handle  learning  million  remaining  routine  systems  technology  they're  travel  workers  
LATEST POSTS

Which jobs will disappear in 20 years? The professions facing extinction

Yet this isn't a simple story of machines taking over. Some jobs disappear not because they're automated, but because society decides they're no longer necessary, ethical, or economically viable. Others transform beyond recognition, retaining only a fraction of their original function. The real question isn't which jobs vanish, but rather how quickly workers can adapt when their entire professional world changes overnight.

The bank teller: when ATMs become intelligent

Bank tellers have been disappearing for decades, but the final blow comes from AI-powered virtual assistants. Traditional ATMs handled basic transactions, but conversational AI now manages complex operations: opening accounts, processing loans, resolving disputes. Banks like Bank of America already report that their virtual assistant "Erica" handles over 100 million interactions annually. The remaining bank employees won't be tellers—they'll be specialists in complex fraud cases or high-net-worth client relationships. The routine work? Fully automated. Young people barely enter bank branches anymore; everything happens through apps that learn your habits and anticipate your needs.

The toll collector's last ticket

Toll collectors seemed safe a decade ago. Today, electronic toll collection systems like E-ZPass in the US or Télépéage in France process over 80% of highway transactions without human intervention. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this trend—contactless became mandatory, not optional. The economics are brutal: a single toll collector costs a highway company approximately $40,000 annually in salary, benefits, and infrastructure. An RFID reader? About $200 with near-zero maintenance. Even in countries with strong unions, the math wins. Some regions have already eliminated all toll booths, replacing them with camera systems that photograph license plates and send bills automatically.

Retail cashiers: the Amazon Go effect

Cashierless stores aren't science fiction anymore. Amazon Go demonstrated that computer vision, shelf sensors, and AI can track what customers take and charge them automatically. The technology costs around $1 million per store to implement but eliminates 10-15 cashier positions that each cost $25,000-$35,000 annually. Major retailers are racing to adopt this technology. Walmart, Kroger, and European chains like Carrefour are testing various cashierless formats. The trend accelerates because it solves multiple problems simultaneously: reduces labor costs, eliminates checkout lines (improving customer satisfaction), and minimizes theft since every item is tracked precisely. The remaining retail workers become "store hosts" or "customer experience specialists"—their job isn't scanning items but helping customers navigate the technology, answer product questions, and handle exceptions the AI can't process.

Travel agents: when algorithms know your preferences better than you

Travel agents once curated personalized experiences. Today, algorithms analyze your search history, social media activity, and past bookings to recommend trips you'll likely enjoy. Platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and Airbnb use machine learning to optimize pricing dynamically and suggest accommodations based on your preferences. The human touch still matters for complex itineraries or luxury travel, but mass-market travel planning has moved online. During the pandemic, online travel agencies saw their market share jump from 56% to 72% as travelers booked independently rather than through agencies. The remaining agents specialize in niche markets: adventure travel, accessible tourism, or corporate accounts where personal relationships still matter.

Factory workers: the collaborative robot revolution

Manufacturing jobs have been declining for decades, but collaborative robots (cobots) change the equation. Unlike traditional industrial robots that required safety cages and specialized programming, cobots work alongside humans, learn tasks through demonstration, and cost as little as $25,000. Companies like Universal Robots report that their cobots typically pay for themselves within 12-18 months through increased productivity and reduced errors. The jobs that disappear aren't just assembly line positions—they're quality control inspectors, material handlers, and packaging workers. What remains are robot technicians, process engineers, and programmers who maintain and optimize the automated systems. The automotive industry exemplifies this shift: Tesla produces roughly the same number of cars as traditional manufacturers but with 70% fewer workers per vehicle. The difference isn't just automation—it's the fundamental reorganization of how manufacturing works.

Data entry clerks: when OCR becomes perfect

Data entry seems like the most vulnerable white-collar job. Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology has improved dramatically, with accuracy rates now exceeding 99% for clean documents. Combined with natural language processing, modern systems can extract information from invoices, forms, and reports without human intervention. The economics are compelling: a data entry clerk costs $30,000-$40,000 annually plus benefits. OCR software costs $5,000-$10,000 with minimal ongoing expenses. Companies implementing these systems report ROI within six months. The remaining work involves handling exceptions, verifying questionable data, and managing the automated systems—not manual data entry.

Telemarketers and call center agents: the AI voice revolution

AI voice technology has reached a tipping point. Google's Duplex demonstrated that AI can make restaurant reservations indistinguishable from humans. Companies like Observe.AI and Talkdesk now offer AI systems that handle customer service calls, understand context, and escalate to humans only when necessary. The cost differential is stark: a human call center agent in the US costs $15-$25 per hour. An AI system costs $1-$2 per hour with 24/7 availability and perfect consistency. During peak periods, AI doesn't need overtime or additional hiring. The remaining human agents handle complex emotional situations, strategic account management, or language pairs where AI still struggles.

Taxi and truck drivers: autonomous vehicles arrive faster than expected

Autonomous vehicle technology advances rapidly. Waymo operates robotaxis in Phoenix with safety records exceeding human drivers. Tesla's Full Self-Driving beta has over 1 million users. The trucking industry faces a particular crisis: the American Trucking Association estimates a shortage of 80,000 drivers, while self-driving trucks from companies like TuSimple and Waymo Via demonstrate cross-country capabilities. The transition won't be instantaneous—regulatory hurdles, infrastructure requirements, and public acceptance create friction. But the trajectory is clear: long-haul trucking becomes automated first (predictable highways, high labor costs), then urban delivery, then ride-hailing. The remaining drivers handle edge cases, supervise autonomous fleets, or work in specialized niches like hazardous materials transport.

Why some jobs survive when logic says they shouldn't

Not every predictable disappearance happens. Some jobs persist because human interaction provides irreplaceable value, or because regulations protect certain professions, or simply because the technology isn't as reliable as promised. Handcrafted goods command premium prices despite mass production. Live performances thrive despite streaming. Therapists remain essential despite mental health apps.

The key insight: jobs don't disappear solely due to automation. They vanish when the combination of technology, economics, and social acceptance makes them unnecessary. A robot barber might work perfectly, but most people still prefer human stylists for the conversation and trust factor. Sometimes the technology exists but the business case doesn't justify replacement.

The jobs that transform rather than disappear

Many professions don't vanish—they metamorphose. Journalists become content strategists. Accountants become financial advisors. Teachers become learning facilitators. The core skills remain valuable, but the tools and methods change dramatically. A journalist who once wrote for print now creates multimedia content, analyzes data, and engages audiences on social media. An accountant who processed transactions now provides strategic financial advice using automated tools. A teacher who lectured now designs personalized learning experiences using adaptive software. The workers who thrive are those who recognize the transformation early and acquire complementary skills. The ones who struggle are those who cling to the old model, believing their specific job title will remain unchanged.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which industries will lose the most jobs to automation?

Manufacturing, retail, transportation, and customer service face the highest displacement rates. These sectors employ millions in routine, predictable tasks that AI and robotics handle efficiently. The World Economic Forum estimates that by 2025, 85 million jobs may be displaced while 97 million new roles emerge—a net gain, but with painful transitions for specific workers and regions.

Will new jobs replace the ones that disappear?

Historically, yes—but with critical differences. The Industrial Revolution created more jobs than it destroyed, but the transition took generations. Today's transformation might be faster, but the new jobs often require different skills. AI trainers, robot technicians, and data analysts didn't exist a generation ago. The challenge isn't job quantity but the skill mismatch between disappearing and emerging roles.

How can workers prepare for these changes?

The most resilient workers develop adaptable skills rather than specific technical knowledge. Critical thinking, creativity, emotional intelligence, and complex problem-solving remain difficult to automate. Continuous learning becomes essential—not just formal education but ongoing skill development throughout one's career. The ability to work with AI tools, rather than being replaced by them, often determines success.

Are there jobs that will definitely survive automation?

Jobs requiring high emotional intelligence, creativity, or complex human judgment show the most resilience. Therapists, artists, strategic advisors, and research scientists remain difficult to automate effectively. However, even these roles evolve—therapists use AI for patient monitoring, artists use AI for inspiration, and scientists use AI for data analysis. The human element persists, but augmented by technology.

The Bottom Line

Twenty years isn't a long time in human terms, but it's an eternity for technological transformation. The jobs that disappear share common characteristics: routine tasks, predictable patterns, and minimal human judgment requirements. The survivors adapt, transform, or provide uniquely human value that technology can't replicate. The workers who navigate this transition successfully aren't necessarily the most technically skilled—they're the most adaptable. They recognize that learning becomes a lifelong activity rather than a phase completed in youth. They understand that their profession might change its name, tools, and methods while retaining core human elements. The future belongs to those who prepare for change rather than resist it. That preparation starts with honest assessment: examining your current role for automatable elements, developing complementary skills, and remaining open to career reinvention. The jobs that disappear aren't necessarily the least valuable—they're often the most routine. And in a world of accelerating change, routine becomes the riskiest career strategy of all.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.