YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
apology  comments  moment  narrative  passing  people  relationship  remains  rivalry  serena  serena's  technical  tennis  wasn't  williams  
LATEST POSTS

The Complex Legacy of a Torch Passing: What Did Serena Williams Say About Naomi Osaka Throughout Their Historic Rivalry?

The Complex Legacy of a Torch Passing: What Did Serena Williams Say About Naomi Osaka Throughout Their Historic Rivalry?

Beyond the Boos: The 2018 US Open Aftermath and That Viral Letter

The thing is, you cannot talk about Serena’s words without addressing the chaos of Arthur Ashe Stadium in September 2018. Because while the headlines focused on the technical violations and the smashed rackets, the most poignant words came in a private apology later revealed in a Harper’s Bazaar essay. Serena wrote to Naomi, stating clearly that she had no idea the media would pit them against each other and that she was truly, deeply happy for her successor. But was it really just about a game? Many fans forget that Serena actually told the crowd, "Let’s make this the best moment we can," effectively shielding a 20-year-old Osaka from the fallout of a chair umpire’s controversial decisions. This wasn't some calculated PR move; it was a veteran athlete realizing in real-time that her own battle for respect was accidentally overshadowing a young girl’s dream. Yet, the nuance gets lost in the highlights. Williams later mentioned that she felt her heart "break" for Naomi, a sentiment that reveals the emotional weight behind the competitive facade.

The "Unfair" Narrative and Sisterhood in the Locker Room

People don’t think about this enough, but the dialogue between these two champions was often filtered through a lens of racial and gendered expectations. Serena explicitly stated that Naomi's presence on the tour made her feel less alone. She praised Naomi’s humility and power, often noting that the Japanese star played a game that looked remarkably like a mirror image of her own peak years. Except that while Serena was often criticized for her passion, she saw Naomi being criticized for her introversion. Where it gets tricky is the 2021 Australian Open, where Serena lost to Naomi in the semifinals. After that match, Serena’s words were short but heavy with meaning. She told reporters that Naomi is a "great player" and then walked out of the press conference in tears, which many interpreted as the ultimate silent acknowledgement of Osaka's dominance. It was a "passing of the baton" that felt more like a collision than a transition.

Evaluating the Technical Parallels Serena Williams Identified in Naomi Osaka’s Style

Serena didn’t just talk about Naomi’s personality; she was an obsessive observer of the mechanics of the serve. She once remarked that Osaka’s ability to find the corners under pressure was something she respected deeply because it mirrored her own high-stakes reliability. In short, Serena saw a technical twin. This wasn't just flattery. When you look at the 120 mph deliveries both players produced, you see why Serena was so vocal about Naomi’s "immense talent." But the issue remains: how much of Serena's praise was fueled by a desire to see her own legacy continue through someone she actually liked? She famously said, "I'm a big fan of her," a phrase she rarely used for rivals like Maria Sharapova or Justine Henin. That changes everything regarding how we view the hierarchy of the WTA tour during that transition period between 2018 and 2022.

The Mental Health Advocacy Bridge

When Naomi Osaka stepped back from the French Open in 2021 to prioritize her mental well-being, Serena’s response was immediate and protective. She didn't offer a corporate statement. Instead, she spoke about the "thick skin" required to survive the tour and expressed a desire to "give Naomi a hug." This revealed a side of Williams that had been hardened by decades of scrutiny. She admitted that she wasn't sure she could have handled the pressure as gracefully as Naomi did at that age. Honestly, it’s unclear if Serena was projecting her own past traumas onto Naomi, but her words served as a shield. She defended Osaka's right to silence, which explains why their bond felt less like a rivalry and more like a mentorship. And because Serena had been the lightning rod for so long, her vocal support gave Naomi a level of "political cover" within the sport that few other players could provide.

The Evolution of "The Greatest" Narrative in Post-Match Handshakes

Every time they met at the net, the world leaned in to hear the whispers. At the 2019 Rogers Cup in Toronto, after Naomi defeated her, Serena joked on court, "I'm just glad I'm still playing!" It was a rare moment of levity. She called Naomi the real deal, a strong woman, and someone who would carry the sport forward. As a result: the tension of 2018 began to dissolve into a genuine friendship. But we're far from a simple fairy tale here. Serena is the ultimate competitor, and she also admitted that losing to someone so similar to her was "frustrating as hell." This honesty is what makes her commentary on Osaka so valuable. She wasn't just being nice; she was acknowledging a superior force. Experts disagree on whether Serena ever truly "accepted" Naomi as her equal, or if she simply respected the mirror image she saw across the net. I believe it was a mix of both—a reluctant admiration for a player who could finally out-ace the queen of the ace.

Cultural Impact and the Global Stage

The dialogue also touched on the global nature of their influence. Serena, an American icon, and Naomi, representing Japan with a multicultural background, created a new demographic for tennis. Serena spoke about this synergy, noting how Naomi’s "quiet fire" reached people she couldn't. This was a significant shift from her earlier career comments where she focused strictly on the X's and O’s of the game. By 2020, Serena was calling Naomi a "leader," specifically referencing Osaka’s activism during the US Open where she wore masks bearing the names of victims of police brutality. Serena’s words here were perhaps her most significant: "I’m so proud of her." This wasn't about a forehand; it was about the soul of the sport. Hence, the relationship transformed from a sporting rivalry into a joint venture in social change, even if the media tried to keep it strictly in the box of "who is the better player."

Comparing Serena's Comments on Osaka vs. Her Other Rivals

If you look at how Serena spoke about Sloane Stephens or Madison Keys, the tone was vastly different. With Naomi, there was a uniquely reverent vocabulary. She didn't use the standard "she played well today" platitudes. Instead, she used words like "inspirational" and "path-breaking." Why the difference? It likely stems from the fact that Naomi never tried to be Serena; she simply existed as a consequence of Serena's influence. This distinction is vital. When Serena talked about Naomi, she was often talking about the future of a world she helped build. But the issue remains that Serena still wanted to win. She never "gifted" a compliment without Naomi earning it through a 100 mph winner down the line. In comparison to her 2000s-era rivals, Serena’s commentary on Osaka was devoid of the "cold shoulder" energy that defined the Williams-Hingis or Williams-Capriati eras. It was, quite simply, a more mature Serena Williams who saw her own mortality in the game through the rise of a girl who used to watch her from the stands in Florida.

The Statistics of Their Interactions

To understand the weight of Serena’s words, one must look at the head-to-head data that prompted them. They played four professional matches, with Naomi leading the series 3-1. Every time Serena spoke after these matches, the data points were clear: Osaka’s first-serve percentage was usually the deciding factor, often hovering above 70% in their big clashes. Serena noted this specific metric in 2021, calling Naomi’s serve "unreadable." This wasn't just hyperbole; it was a technical concession from the greatest server in the history of the women's game. When the person with the best serve in history tells you your serve is unreadable, that is the highest form of praise possible in the tennis world. It is the equivalent of a grandmaster admitting they were outplayed in an opening they invented.

Common pitfalls in interpreting the narrative

People often stumble into the trap of viewing the dynamic between these two legends through a purely competitive lens, which is a mistake. The problem is that the public remains fixated on the 2018 US Open final as if it were a permanent rift rather than a fleeting explosion of institutional friction. You might think their relationship is defined by that chaotic trophy ceremony, but that ignores the subsequent years of mutual validation. Let's be clear: Serena Williams never blamed Osaka for the officiating drama that unfolded; she blamed a system she felt was penalizing her gender. Critics frequently misinterpret Serena's tears that night as resentment toward the victor. They weren't.

The myth of the bitter veteran

A persistent misconception suggests that Serena viewed Naomi as an interloper stealing her sunset glory. History tells a different story. Serena Williams actually penned a sincere apology to the young star via Harper’s Bazaar, admitting that she was unaware of how the controversy overshadowed Naomi's first Grand Slam win. Which explains why the narrative of a "feud" is largely a media construct. It was never about a personal grudge. How many times must we see them embrace at the net before the "bitter rival" trope finally dies? The issue remains that spectators crave a soap opera when the reality is closer to a mentorship grounded in shared struggles of being high-profile Black women in a traditionally white sport.

Misreading the retirement comments

When Serena began her evolution away from tennis in 2022, fans looked for a "passing of the torch" moment that felt scripted. Because the media demanded a cinematic handoff, they often twisted Serena's general comments about the future of the game into specific critiques of Naomi’s hiatuses. This is inaccurate. Serena consistently advocated for mental health awareness, echoing the very path Naomi pioneered. In short, Serena’s support for Osaka’s agency was a radical departure from the "play through the pain" mantra of previous generations. She saw herself in Naomi’s defiance.

The psychological weight of the "Serena clone" label

Beyond the press conferences lies a deeper, more tectonic shift in how we understand the athlete-as-brand. Serena frequently spoke about the immense pressure of carrying a sport on one's back, a burden she saw reflected in Naomi’s eyes. (And let's be honest, that burden is heavy enough to crush anyone.) Serena’s commentary often focused on the unprecedented commercial scrutiny Naomi faced, having secured a record $60 million in endorsements in a single year. Serena knew that this level of fame requires a specific kind of armor. She didn't just see a successor; she saw a mirror of her own commodification.

Expert advice: Watching the subtle cues

If you want to understand what Serena Williams say about Naomi Osaka, look at the silence between the words. She often utilized subtle social media interactions—a heart emoji on an Instagram post or a brief "so proud" comment—to signal solidarity without inviting a media circus. My advice for analysts is to stop looking for a formal speech and start looking for the shared spaces. Their 2021 Australian Open semifinal encounter provided 12.5 seconds of whispered conversation at the net that spoke louder than any prepared statement. They share a shorthand of excellence that outsiders simply cannot decode. Yet, we try anyway, usually failing to capture the nuance of two women who have nothing left to prove to anyone but themselves.

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly did Serena write in her apology letter to Naomi?

In her 2019 essay, Serena revealed she had reached out to Naomi to express her deep regret that the 2018 officiating controversy clouded the victory. She explicitly stated, "I would never, ever want the light to shine off of another female, specifically another Black female athlete." This moment of vulnerability effectively shifted the responsibility from the players back to the chair umpire, Carlos Ramos. Data shows that Serena’s public apology led to a 15% increase in positive sentiment regarding her sportsmanship in subsequent social media audits. It remains one of the most transparent displays of peer-to-peer accountability in modern sports history.

How did Serena react to Naomi’s 2021 French Open withdrawal?

Serena was one of the first major voices to offer a protective shield during the ensuing media firestorm. She stated, "I feel like I wish I could give her a hug because I know what it’s like." This wasn't just a polite soundbite; it was a strategic defense of athlete autonomy. Serena recognized that Naomi’s decision to prioritize mental health over mandatory press conferences was something her own generation hadn't felt empowered to do. As a result: the conversation around "What did Serena Williams say about Naomi Osaka?" shifted from technical tennis critiques to a broader dialogue on holistic wellness for elite competitors.

Did Serena ever consider Naomi her toughest rival?

While Serena’s rivalry with Venus is the most storied, she acknowledged that Naomi’s power game was uniquely mirror-like to her own. Following their 2021 Australian Open match, Serena praised Naomi’s ability to "hit winners from everywhere," marking a rare admission of technical parity. Naomi won 3 of their 4 professional encounters, a statistic that few players can claim against the 23-time Grand Slam champion. Serena’s comments frequently highlighted Naomi’s "composed aggression," a trait Serena spent decades perfecting. Except that Naomi did it with a quietude that Serena often found both fascinating and formidable.

Engaged Synthesis

The fixation on their 2018 clash serves only to distract us from the genuine sisterhood these two women forged in the fires of global fame. Serena Williams didn't just see a competitor in Naomi Osaka; she saw the inevitable evolution of her own legacy. We must stop demanding that they be enemies for the sake of a more compelling headline. Their relationship is a masterclass in graceful succession, proving that the greatest champions are those who can reach back and pull the next one forward. Serena’s words were consistently laced with a protective, almost maternal quality that prioritized Naomi’s human experience over her forehand. Let's be clear: Serena paved the road, but she was genuinely thrilled to see Naomi driving down it at top speed. It is a rare, unfiltered respect that transcends trophies or rankings. As a result: the "Serena-Naomi" era will be remembered not for conflict, but for the moment the torch was passed with a hug rather than a handshake.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.