YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
average  baseball  baseball's  career  defensive  difficult  hitter  hitters  injuries  likely  modern  player  players  seasons  that's  
LATEST POSTS

Will Anyone Ever Hit 700 Home Runs Again?

The 700 Club: Baseball's Mount Everest

When Barry Bonds launched his 700th career home run on September 17, 2004, he joined an exclusive club that had taken baseball over a century to populate. Babe Ruth reached 700 in 1934, Hank Aaron in 1973, and Bonds himself in 2004. That's it. Just three players had ever reached that magical number before Bonds made it four.

The thing is, reaching 700 home runs requires a perfect storm of circumstances: extraordinary natural talent, exceptional health, incredible longevity, and playing in an era that favors power hitting. Today's game has shifted dramatically from the conditions that allowed Ruth, Aaron, and Bonds to thrive.

Why 700 Became the Benchmark

The 700-home-run milestone emerged as baseball's unofficial benchmark for all-time greatness because it represented roughly twice the career total of an elite power hitter from earlier eras. When Babe Ruth first approached 700, the previous home run record stood at 536 (held by Hank Greenberg). Ruth's ability to nearly double that total seemed superhuman.

But here's where it gets interesting: the 700-home-run club wasn't always so exclusive. Through the 1960s, only Ruth had reached that mark. Aaron broke through in 1973, then the floodgates opened with Bonds, Alex Rodriguez, and Albert Pujols all surpassing 700 in the 21st century. So what changed?

The Modern Game: Why 700 Seems Unreachable

Today's baseball bears little resemblance to the power-friendly environment of the 1990s and early 2000s. Several factors have converged to make 700 home runs seem like an impossible target for current players.

The Three-True-Outcomes Era

Modern baseball has become obsessed with strikeouts, walks, and home runs—the so-called "three true outcomes." While this might seem beneficial for power hitters, it's actually created a paradox. Pitchers throw harder than ever, with the average fastball velocity increasing from 89.9 mph in 2008 to over 94 mph today. That's not just a statistic; it's the difference between making solid contact and swinging through pitches.

Moreover, defensive shifts have neutralized many power hitters' strengths. A hitter who once pulled 40 home runs might now see those same batted balls routinely converted into outs by strategically positioned fielders.

The Health Factor: Bodies Breaking Down

Perhaps the most overlooked obstacle to reaching 700 home runs is the dramatic increase in player injuries. Modern players are bigger, stronger, and faster than ever before, but their bodies are also more prone to breakdown.

Consider this: Barry Bonds played 22 seasons with relatively few significant injuries. Hank Aaron played 23 seasons, missing substantial time only once. Today's stars rarely make it past 15 seasons without major injuries. Mike Trout, perhaps the most talented player of his generation, has already missed significant time in six of his first 12 seasons.

The Contract Structure Problem

Here's something most fans don't consider: modern baseball contracts actually discourage the longevity needed for 700 home runs. Teams are increasingly reluctant to offer long-term deals to aging players, especially power hitters whose defensive value typically declines rapidly.

A player who hits 35 home runs at age 25 might struggle to find a multi-year deal at age 35, even if he's still productive. The economics of baseball have shifted toward younger, cheaper talent rather than paying premium dollars for declining veterans.

The Active Players: Who Has a Shot?

When examining active players, the math becomes sobering. Let's look at the most likely candidates and why their paths to 700 remain extraordinarily difficult.

Juan Soto: The Best Bet?

At 26 years old, Juan Soto has 235 career home runs. To reach 700, he'd need to maintain his current pace of roughly 35 home runs per season for another 14 seasons—taking him to age 40. That's theoretically possible, but it requires him to stay healthy, productive, and employed at an age when most power hitters are retired or significantly diminished.

The issue is that Soto would need to hit 35 home runs at age 39 and 40 to even have a chance. Very few players have ever maintained that level of power into their late 30s, especially in today's game where velocity and defensive positioning create additional challenges.

Ronald Acuña Jr.: The Wild Card

Acuña, also 26, has 171 home runs and a slightly different profile. His combination of speed and power makes him unique, but it also increases his injury risk. Players who rely on explosive athleticism often break down earlier than pure power hitters.

To reach 700, Acuña would need to average 35 home runs for the next 15 seasons. Given his injury history and the physical toll of his all-fields power approach, this seems highly improbable. He's more likely to reach 500 than 700.

The Next Generation: Too Early to Tell

Players like Julio Rodríguez, Bobby Witt Jr., and Juan Soto's teammate Elly De La Cruz represent baseball's future, but they're simply too early in their careers to project 700-home-run potential.

Rodríguez, at 23, has 63 home runs. Even if he maintains a 35-home-run pace, he'd need to play until he's 41 to reach 700. That's asking a lot from a player who relies heavily on speed and athleticism.

The Statistical Reality Check

Let's break down the numbers in a way that makes the 700-home-run challenge crystal clear. A player needs to average 35 home runs for 20 seasons to reach 700. That's not just difficult; it's historically unprecedented.

The Longevity Problem

Only 15 players in baseball history have played 20 or more seasons. Of those, only a handful were power hitters who could reasonably approach 700 home runs. The attrition rate for power hitters is particularly severe because:

  • Power typically peaks between ages 27-29
  • Most power hitters see significant decline by age 35
  • Injuries accumulate over time, especially for larger players
  • Teams become less willing to pay for declining production

The Pace Problem

Even if a player could maintain health for 20 seasons, the modern game's pace makes 35 home runs per season increasingly difficult. The average MLB game now features more pitching changes, more specialized relievers, and more defensive positioning than ever before.

A hitter who faces five different pitchers in a game, each throwing 96+ mph with specific game plans, has a much harder time hitting home runs than a player facing the same starter for multiple at-bats in previous eras.

What Would It Take? The Perfect Storm Scenario

For someone to realistically challenge 700 home runs in the modern era, several extraordinary circumstances would need to align:

The Physical Requirements

First, the player would need to be a physical outlier—someone with the strength of Aaron Judge, the hand-eye coordination of Tony Gwynn, and the durability of Cal Ripken Jr. This combination of attributes has never existed in a single player.

Second, they'd need to avoid the injuries that plague even the most careful athletes. Modern training methods and sports science can only do so much against the cumulative toll of thousands of high-intensity swings.

The Environmental Requirements

The player would need to play in a hitter-friendly ballpark for most of their career, avoid significant defensive shifts, and benefit from favorable weather patterns (yes, climate can affect home run rates).

They'd also need to play in an era that values power hitting enough to keep them employed through their decline phase—something that seems increasingly unlikely given baseball's analytical shift toward defensive value and on-base skills.

The Statistical Requirements

Mathematically, a player would need to hit at least 35 home runs per season for 20 seasons, or find some combination of higher peaks and acceptable valleys that averages out to the necessary total. Neither scenario seems realistic given current trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Could a player reach 700 home runs by playing longer than 20 seasons?

Technically yes, but this creates additional problems. Players who extend their careers into their 40s typically see dramatic declines in power output. Even if a player could maintain a 25-home-run pace from ages 40-45, they'd still need to average 38 home runs in their first 20 seasons—an extraordinarily difficult feat that few players have ever achieved.

Has anyone come close to 700 recently?

Albert Pujols finished his career with 703 home runs, the most recent player to surpass 700. Before him, Alex Rodriguez retired with 696. Since Pujols' retirement in 2022, no active player appears capable of reaching 700 within the next decade, barring extraordinary circumstances.

Could rule changes make 700 home runs more achievable?

Potentially. If Major League Baseball were to implement rules that significantly benefit power hitters—such as banning defensive shifts, moving the pitcher's mound back, or using a different baseball—it could create conditions more favorable to home run production. However, current trends suggest the opposite: baseball seems intent on maintaining the status quo rather than implementing power-friendly changes.

Is 700 home runs still the most impressive power milestone?

This is debatable. Some argue that 600 home runs might be a more meaningful benchmark in the modern era, as it represents truly elite power production without requiring the kind of superhuman longevity that 700 demands. Others suggest that different statistics—like career OPS or WAR—might better capture a player's overall value than raw home run totals.

The Bottom Line: 700 Is Likely Out of Reach

After examining all the factors—physical, statistical, economic, and environmental—it's difficult to envision a scenario where a player reaches 700 home runs in the foreseeable future. The combination of increased pitching velocity, sophisticated defensive positioning, injury concerns, and economic realities creates a perfect storm of obstacles.

Does this mean we'll never see another 700-home-run hitter? Probably not never—baseball has a way of surprising us. But if it happens, it will likely require either a dramatic shift in how the game is played or the emergence of a once-in-a-generation talent who defies all conventional wisdom about aging, injuries, and power production.

For now, the 700-home-run club remains baseball's most exclusive fraternity, with membership likely to stay at four for the foreseeable future. And that's okay. Some records are meant to stand as monuments to the extraordinary circumstances and abilities that made them possible in the first place.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.