YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
academy  actually  athletic  coordination  development  played  players  skills  soccer  specialization  sports  started  starters  starting  travel  
LATEST POSTS

Is 7 Years Old Too Late to Start Soccer?

Let’s cut through the noise: youth soccer has become a circus of sideline anxiety, tryout hype, and viral highlight reels of six-year-olds doing step-overs like they’re auditioning for Barcelona. But here’s the thing—most of those kids vanish by 13. Meanwhile, the ones who started later, played multiple sports, and actually enjoyed the process? They’re the ones showing up on academy rosters at 15. You don’t need to be Messi at seven to play at a high level. You just need time, exposure, and space to grow—on your own damn schedule.

The Myth of the “Golden Window” in Youth Soccer

There’s this idea floating around—that if your kid hasn’t joined a travel team by age six, they’ve already lost the race. Like missing a flight you never booked. But where does that come from? Mostly from clubs with expensive registration fees and recruiters who benefit from early identification. The reality? Long-term athletic development doesn’t work on a rigid timeline. It’s messy. It’s nonlinear. Some kids bloom at 12. Others at 16.

We’ve seen it over and over: early bloomers plateau while late starters surge past them physically and technically. Take Jude Bellingham. Started at Birmingham City’s academy at 7—same age we’re talking about. But he didn’t dominate instantly. He trained, he played, he made mistakes. And by 16, he was starting in the Championship. Not because he started early—but because he developed consistently.

And that’s exactly where the “golden window” argument falls apart. It assumes peak performance in adulthood hinges on cramming skills before age 8. Yet, research from the UK’s Football Association shows that only about 18% of professional players were identified before age 9. Which means over four out of five? They slipped under the radar—then emerged later. So no, starting at 7 isn’t late. It’s actually right on time.

Physical and Cognitive Readiness at Age 7

By 7, most kids can follow multi-step instructions, handle basic spatial awareness, and have the motor coordination to dribble and pass with some control. Fine. But what people don’t think about enough is that motor skill acquisition isn’t just about kicking a ball. It’s about balance, agility, rhythm—and those come faster when kids have played tag, jumped rope, ridden bikes, or tried gymnastics.

Coordination and Motor Skills

At this age, the nervous system is primed for learning movement patterns. A child who’s active in unstructured play often picks up soccer mechanics faster than one drilled in isolation. Dribbling? It’s not just footwork. It’s peripheral vision, timing, anticipation. These aren’t taught in lines doing cone drills. They’re built through play—kicking around in the yard, pickup games, messing up and trying again.

Attention Span and Learning Curve

And yes, attention spans are short. But that’s not a barrier—it’s a feature. Kids at 7 learn through doing, not lectures. A 10-minute coaching talk? Useless. A 5-minute demo followed by 30 minutes of small-sided games? That’s gold. That’s where real learning happens. Because they’re engaged. They’re solving problems on the fly: “How do I get past this kid without losing the ball?” No coach can script that. But it happens every Saturday morning at local fields across the country.

Comparing Early vs. Late Starters: What the Data Suggests

Here’s a stat that changes everything: a 2020 study tracking Dutch youth academies found that among players who made first-team appearances, the average age of joining was 9.2. Not 6. Not 7. Nine. And that’s in the Netherlands—where youth development is borderline scientific. So if even there—where they track every sprint and pass—most pros don’t come in until after 7, why are American parents panicking at 6?

Early Specialization Risks

Pushing too hard, too early, comes with costs. Overuse injuries—especially in the knees and growth plates—have risen 40% in youth soccer over the past decade. And burnout? By age 13, nearly 70% of kids quit organized sports altogether. Many of them are the ones who were pushed into elite travel teams at 6, trained year-round, and never got to just play for fun. Is that really the goal?

Late Starters’ Advantages

Meanwhile, kids who begin at 7 or later often have a wider athletic base. Maybe they played baseball, swam, or did karate. That cross-training builds resilience—physically and mentally. They’re less likely to get injured. They adapt faster. And because they weren’t “the star” at 6, they don’t carry the pressure of expectation. They’re free to learn. To fail. To grow.

Real-World Examples: Pros Who Started at or After 7

Okay, so data’s one thing. Stories? They stick. Take Mohamed Salah. Started playing seriously at 14. Fourteen. Yes, he kicked balls before then—but not in any formal system. His first club? Arab Contractors SC in Cairo. No fancy academy. No viral clips. Just passion, repetition, and opportunity.

Or how about Carli Lloyd? Didn’t fully commit to soccer until high school. She played basketball and ran track. Yet still became a two-time Olympic gold medalist and World Cup champion. And that’s not a fluke. It’s a pattern. Because early specialization isn’t a guarantee. It’s a gamble. And the house usually wins.

And then there’s Gareth Bale. Started at 9. Nine! Joined Southampton’s academy later than many of his peers. But because he was athletic—fast, strong, explosive—he caught up quickly. By 17, he was in the Premier League. So no, 7 isn’t late. If anything, it’s early compared to some who made it at the highest level.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my child still make a travel or academy team if they start at 7?

Absolutely. Most local travel teams don’t filter kids out until U9 or U10. That gives two to three years to develop skills, gain confidence, and catch up technically. And if your child is athletic, coachable, and willing to put in reps? They’ll close the gap. Coaches care more about attitude and adaptability than raw skill at this age. Talent is nice. But effort wins spots.

How many hours per week should a 7-year-old train?

Two to three sessions max. One practice, one game, maybe a second training. That’s 3–5 hours total. Any more than that, and you’re risking burnout and overuse. At this age, unstructured play matters more than extra drills. Let them kick the ball in the backyard. Play keep-away with siblings. That’s where creativity thrives.

Should they play other sports too?

Yes—actually, I’d argue they must. Playing multiple sports builds overall athleticism. Baseball improves hand-eye coordination. Swimming builds lung capacity. Basketball teaches spatial awareness and quick decision-making. And that’s exactly what translates to better soccer later. The most versatile athletes aren’t the ones who kicked a ball every day since age 4. They’re the ones who played everything—and brought those skills to the pitch.

The Bottom Line

Seven years old? That’s not too late. It’s not early. It’s just—normal. Development isn’t a race with a fixed starting line. It’s a winding path, full of detours, plateaus, and sudden jumps. Some kids sprint ahead. Others start slow and finish strong. And honestly, it is unclear who’s going to stick with it long-term. What we do know: love for the game beats pressure every time.

I find this overrated—the idea that you have to lock in by age 6. It creates stress. It pushes kids toward quitting. And it ignores the fact that most professional soccer players weren’t standout prodigies at 7. They were kids who kept playing because it was fun. Because they got better gradually. Because they weren’t burned out by travel schedules and tryout stress before they could read a scoreboard.

So if your 7-year-old wants to try soccer? Sign them up. But not for glory. Not for scholarships. For joy. For movement. For the chance to fall in love with the game on their own terms. Because if they do—everything else has a way of following. And if they don’t? Well, at least they tried. And that’s more than most adults can say.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.