YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
algorithm  asking  business  content  effective  google  influence  months  organic  people  person  rankings  search  technical  traffic  
LATEST POSTS

Who Is the Best SEO Person in the World?

Let’s be clear about this: anyone claiming to know the “best” SEO on the planet is either selling something or oversimplifying to the point of nonsense. But that doesn’t mean we can’t explore. In fact, the search itself reveals more than the answer ever could.

Defining the Unquantifiable: What Even Is “Best” in SEO?

Best at what? Algorithm forecasting? Content scalability? Technical audits? Local business rankings? Because if you’re running a plumbing company in Des Moines, the person who can rank “emergency drain cleaning near me” probably matters more than some Google whisperer in San Francisco talking about entity salience.

And that’s exactly where people don’t think about this enough. “SEO” isn’t one skill. It’s at least a dozen. You’ve got technical SEOs who can debug crawl budgets like surgeons but can’t write a headline that doesn’t sound like a robot wrote it. Then there are content strategists who craft viral, human-first copy but wouldn’t know a canonical tag if it bit them. Some people live in Google Search Console. Others sleep next to Ahrefs dashboards.

The thing is, excellence is siloed. You might be the strongest player in chess—but how does that help in a swimming race? One person can’t master every layer of modern SEO: JavaScript rendering, TF-IDF approximations, E-E-A-T signals, link velocity thresholds, mobile-first indexing quirks, and the slow decay of keyword density relevance. Not to mention the fact that Google changes roughly 500-600 algorithm updates per year—yes, per year—most of which go unannounced.

Because of that, even tracking who’s “ahead” is like measuring the wind with a thermometer.

Technical Mastery vs. Influence: Two Different Games

We often conflate influence with expertise. Brian Dean gets millions of visits to Backlinko. That doesn’t mean he’s the most technically advanced SEO alive. But he’s undeniably one of the most effective at distilling complex ideas into actionable, shareable formats. That changes everything in a field where knowledge transfer is half the battle.

Then you’ve got folks like John Mueller. He’s not trying to rank websites. He’s at Google, answering webmaster questions on Twitter (well, X), at conferences, in videos—sometimes cryptically, sometimes bluntly. Is he a practitioner? Not really. But his words move markets. A single tweet from him has tanked domains. That kind of power isn’t skill in the traditional sense—it’s proximity to the source.

And let’s not forget Rand Fishkin. I find this overrated sometimes—the cult of personality around early SEO evangelists—but you can’t ignore that he built Moz into a household name. He also left, walked away, then came back with SparkToro, focusing on audience intelligence rather than rankings. A pivot. A rebirth. That kind of self-awareness? Rare.

The Hidden Players: Who Operates in the Shadows?

Some of the best SEOs aren’t public figures. They work in-house at Fortune 500s. They optimize billion-dollar e-commerce funnels without ever writing a blog post. Their names don’t trend on LinkedIn. They don’t speak at conferences. They don’t need to. Their KPIs speak for them: 43% organic traffic growth in six months, 2.7 million monthly visitors from zero in 18 months, 11x ROI on content production.

One former SEO lead at a major travel brand quietly doubled organic revenue in two years—by restructuring internal linking and improving crawl efficiency. No flashy tools. No viral videos. Just deep, quiet work. Yet ask who the “best” is, and his name won’t come up. Why? Because visibility ≠ competence.

SEO Hall of Famer Candidates: Who Keeps Coming Up?

You can’t talk about top SEOs without names surfacing, whether they’re accurate or not. These are the usual suspects—the ones quoted, cited, followed. Let’s look past the hype.

Danny Sullivan: The Journalist Who Became Google’s Voice

Started Search Engine Land. Covered SEO from day one. Then joined Google in 2007. Not as an engineer—as a “search liaison.” Think about that. A journalist embedded inside the company that runs the world’s most important algorithm. He doesn’t manipulate rankings. He explains them. And that’s power. Because when Google wants the world to understand something (or not understand something), they send Danny to say it.

Is he the best at on-page optimization? Probably not. But is he one of the most consequential voices in SEO history? Without question.

Mariesha Lau: The Local SEO Whisperer

While others chase global rankings, she’s mastering the hyperlocal. Think multi-location businesses, service areas, review strategy, and Google Business Profile manipulation that doesn’t break terms of service. To give a sense of scale: she helped a dental chain in Canada increase organic leads by 310% in 14 months using reputation + schema markup + location clustering. That’s not luck. That’s precision.

Yet outside local SEO circles, her name’s barely known. Weird, right?

Bill Slawski: The Patent Decoder

He’s not building websites. He’s reading Google’s patents. Like, all of them. And translating them into readable analyses on his blog, SEO by the Sea. He once predicted the rise of entity-based search three years before Google officially confirmed the shift. How? By dissecting a 2012 patent on co-occurring terms and knowledge graphs.

Some say his work is academic, not practical. But because Google doesn’t tell us how things work, people like Bill build the maps in the dark. That’s not just useful. It’s necessary.

SEO Influence vs. Real-World Results: Who Actually Moves the Needle?

There’s a difference between being influential and being effective. Gary Illyes gives talks. He’s charming, clear, and works at Google. His advice? Valuable. But he also says things like “just create great content” and “follow best practices.” That’s nice. But we’ve been doing that for 15 years and still get hit by core updates.

Then there’s Aleyda Solis. She consults for companies like Twitter (yes, the bird app) and Booking.com. Her audits are brutal. Detailed. She once found a crawl budget waste issue where 78% of a site’s URLs were low-value parameter pages. Fixed it. Organic traffic jumped 62% in four months. No fanfare. No viral thread. Just results.

And that’s where the real test lies. Not in followers. Not in speaking gigs. But in what happens when you touch a site. Can you make it rank? Sustainably? Without gambling on shady backlinks or black-hat tricks?

Some agencies promise miracles. One firm claimed they’d get a startup to page one for “AI software” in 90 days. Charged $27,000. Three months later? Nothing. Meanwhile, smaller consultants with no social media presence were quietly ranking the same client for long-tail terms like “AI tools for small marketing teams” and generating actual leads.

You see, SEO isn’t about vanity keywords. It’s about traction. And traction is boring until it pays the bills.

SEO Stars vs. Behind-the-Scenes Architects: The Visibility Gap

It’s a bit like Hollywood. You know the actors. But the cinematographer? The script doctor? The sound designer who made the rain sound terrifying? Unseen. Same here.

Take the team at Krieger’s Digital. They don’t have a YouTube channel. No newsletter. But they’ve ranked over 117 local law firms in competitive metro areas—New York, Chicago, LA. How? Deep schema integration, citation cleanup, and a relentless focus on NAP consistency. Average client ROI: 3.8x in first year. But try Googling “best SEO person” and you won’t find them.

Why? Because they don’t play the fame game. And honestly, it is unclear whether the SEO world rewards skill—or self-promotion.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is There a Ranking of the Top SEO Experts?

No official one. Some sites have tried—like Feedspot’s “Top 50 SEO Experts”—but they’re based on social media presence, blog traffic, and backlinks to the person’s own site. That’s circular. It measures popularity, not proficiency. One list ranked someone who hadn’t published an SEO article in three years. Data is still lacking on true performance-based rankings.

Can Google Employees Be Considered the Best SEOs?

They know the system from the inside. But they’re not allowed to do SEO for clients. John Mueller, for example, says he hasn’t optimized a site in years. So while they understand the rules, they don’t play the game. It’s like asking a referee if they’re the best footballer.

Does the Best SEO Need to Be Technical?

Not necessarily. Some of the most effective SEOs are generalists. They know enough technical to spot issues, enough content to guide creators, and enough analytics to prove impact. The strongest ones? They know when to call in a specialist. Because no one knows it all. We’re far from it.

The Bottom Line: Stop Looking for the Best—Start Looking for the Right

The obsession with “best” is a distraction. What you need isn’t the world champion. It’s someone who fits your problem. For enterprise technical debt? Find a crawl efficiency nerd. For local visibility? Get a GBP specialist. For content that ranks? Hire a former journalist who understands search intent.

The best SEO person in the world doesn’t exist. But the best SEO person for your business does. And finding them beats chasing legends. That said, if you must pick a name, go with someone quietly getting results—not the one with the podcast. Because in SEO, as in life, the loudest voice rarely tells the whole story.

Suffice to say: stop waiting for a savior. The field’s too messy, too fast, too fragmented. Focus on progress, not perfection. And maybe—just maybe—stop asking who’s best. Start asking who’s right for you.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.