YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
ASSOCIATED TAGS
distribution  energy  enterprise  income  infrastructure  investors  midstream  natural  partners  pipeline  pipelines  prices  products  stocks  transfer  
LATEST POSTS

What Is the Best Pipeline Stock to Own Right Now?

We’re far from it if you think pipeline stocks are all created equal—some are ticking time bombs masked as dividend aristocrats, while others quietly build value like bricklayers laying stone by stone.

How Pipeline Stocks Work: Infrastructure That Keeps Energy Moving

Pipelines are the unsung arteries of the energy world. They move crude oil, natural gas, refined products, and even carbon dioxide across states and continents. Most operate as master limited partnerships (MLPs), a tax structure that avoids corporate income tax as long as they pass most earnings to investors. This setup makes them high-yield magnets—often yielding 6% to 8%, sometimes more. But not all MLPs are built the same. Some rely heavily on commodity prices. Others, like true midstream operators, earn fees just for transporting fuel, shielding them from oil market swings.

And that’s where it gets tricky: investors often confuse pipeline companies with oil producers. They’re not. A drillbit company lives and dies by $/barrel. A pipeline operator? It makes money whether oil is $50 or $100—because someone always needs to move the stuff.

EPD generates over 95% of its cash flow from fee-based contracts, not volume bets or commodity exposure. That insulation is why its distribution has grown for 25 straight years—even through bear markets, pandemics, and the shale bust of 2020. Compare that to Energy Transfer (ET), which still carries heavier commodity risk and a more aggressive leverage profile. One feels like a utility. The other? A leveraged play with a yield that looks tempting—until you dig into the debt.

Midstream firms don’t explore. They don’t refine. They don’t sell gasoline at stations. They are, quite literally, toll collectors on energy highways. That business model—boring, reliable, contractual—is why institutional money quietly pours into this sector during uncertain times.

Why Midstream Is Different From Upstream and Downstream

Upstream means drilling and extraction. Downstream means refining and retail. Midstream—the part we’re talking about—sits in the middle. It’s pipelines, storage tanks, processing plants. Because it’s asset-heavy and regulated, returns are stable but rarely explosive. The thing is, that stability is underrated. While upstream companies lay off workers when prices crash, midstream firms keep collecting fees. It’s a bit like comparing a toll road operator to a trucking company—the trucker struggles when fuel prices spike; the toll booth doesn’t care.

The Tax Structure Quirk: MLPs and K-1 Forms

Most pipeline stocks are MLPs, meaning they issue Schedule K-1 tax forms instead of 1099s. For some investors, this is a hassle—K-1s complicate tax filing, especially in IRAs (where they can trigger unrelated business taxable income). But the trade-off is real: MLPs often offer higher yields than traditional corporations because they avoid double taxation. Not every investor wants that complexity. But if you’re in a taxable account and want yield without chasing junk bonds, it’s a worthwhile compromise.

The Top Contenders: EPD, ET, MMP, and SPHD Compared

Let’s cut through the noise. Four names dominate the pipeline conversation: Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Energy Transfer (ET), Magellan Midstream Partners (MMP), and the Alerian MLP ETF (SPHD). Each serves a different purpose. EPD is the gold standard for safety and consistency. ET offers growth—but at a cost. MMP once stood out for its clean balance sheet, but its merger with ONEOK in 2023 changed the game. SPHD spreads risk across dozens of names, but dilutes the upside.

Enterprise Products Partners has a $72 billion enterprise value, operates over 50,000 miles of pipeline, and handles everything from ethane to liquefied petroleum gas. Its distribution coverage ratio—a measure of payout safety—has hovered near 1.6x for years. That’s strong. Energy Transfer, by contrast, runs leaner, with over $60 billion in enterprise value and a yield nudging 8%, but its coverage ratio has historically danced closer to 1.2x, leaving less margin for error.

And then there’s Magellan. Before the ONEOK deal, it was a darling—low debt, fee-based model, consistent hikes. Post-merger? It’s no longer a standalone stock. So if you liked MMP’s profile, you’re now betting on a larger, more diversified energy infrastructure firm with different priorities.

SPHD, the ETF, owns all of the above in varying weights. It yields about 7.3% and spreads risk. But because it includes smaller, less stable MLPs, its overall resilience isn’t quite at EPD’s level. It’s a solid “set and forget” option—except when markets panic. Then, even the strong get dragged down with the weak.

Because diversification isn’t always protection when sentiment turns.

Enterprise Products Partners: The Steady Eddie

EPD doesn’t try to win the yield war. Its current payout is around 6.5%. But it’s raised that payout every single year since 1998. Think about that: through 9/11, the financial crisis, the 2014 oil crash, and the pandemic, EPD kept increasing what it pays investors. Its CEO, Jimmy Gallogly, ran the company like a Swiss watchmaker—precise, conservative, focused on cash flow above all. Under current leadership, the strategy hasn’t changed.

And that’s exactly where EPD wins: it doesn’t need to take reckless bets to grow. Its footprint is already massive. It connects Gulf Coast export terminals to Permian Basin wells. It owns massive fractionation trains that separate natural gas liquids. These are expensive, hard-to-replicate assets. They create natural moats. You can’t just build a rival pipeline overnight—permits take years, capital runs into billions.

Energy Transfer: Growth With Baggage

Energy Transfer is more aggressive. It’s run by Kelcy Warren, a billionaire known for big moves and tighter financial cushions. The company has grown through acquisition, not just organic build-out. That strategy works in rising markets. But when interest rates climb—as they did in 2022 and 2023—debt servicing eats into cash flow. ET’s net debt exceeds $50 billion. EPD’s is closer to $20 billion despite a similar size.

The issue remains: can ET sustain its distribution long-term without further equity raises or asset sales? Analysts are split. Some argue its scale protects it. Others point to past suspensions of distribution growth as warning signs. Because unlike EPD, ET paused hikes during downturns. That matters if you’re counting on compounding.

Why Yield Isn’t Everything: The Hidden Risks in Pipeline Stocks

A 9% yield looks great on paper. But if it’s funded by borrowing, not cash flow, it’s a mirage. We saw this blow up in 2015–2016 when dozens of MLPs slashed payouts after overextending. The problem is, investors chase yield like moths to flame—until the flame burns them.

Distribution coverage below 1.3x should raise eyebrows. Below 1.1x? Red flag. EPD’s consistent 1.5x+ gives it room to weather storms. Other names flirt with danger. Take NuStar Energy (NS). It yielded over 10% in 2022—and then cut its payout by 60%. Oops.

Regulatory risk is quieter but real. Environmental groups target pipelines constantly. Projects like Keystone XL get canceled. Permitting delays cost millions. Yet existing pipelines? They’re already built. That’s why owning established, operational assets beats betting on expansion dreams.

And here’s something people don’t think about enough: not all pipelines are essential forever. The rise of renewables and electrification could, over decades, reduce demand for oil and gas transport. But we’re talking 30-year timelines. In the short to medium term, energy demand remains robust—especially globally. Europe still needs LNG. Asia wants petrochemical feedstocks. The U.S. produces more natural gas than ever.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are Pipeline Stocks Safe During Recessions?

Generally, yes—more so than most energy sectors. Because pipelines move essential fuels, their volumes don’t drop sharply during downturns. Heating oil, gasoline, jet fuel—people still need them even when times are tough. EPD’s cash flow dipped just 3% during the worst of 2020. That said, a prolonged global slowdown could impact industrial demand and new project approvals.

Can You Hold Pipeline Stocks in an IRA?

You can—but beware of UBTI (unrelated business taxable income). MLPs in tax-advantaged accounts can trigger taxes once annual UBTI exceeds $1,000. For hands-off investors, ETNs like JPMorgan Alerian MLP ETN (AMJ) avoid K-1s but come with their own risks, including credit exposure to the issuer.

Will Pipeline Stocks Survive the Energy Transition?

Honestly, it is unclear. Some pipelines may repurpose for hydrogen or CO2 transport. Others will phase out. But the infrastructure won’t vanish overnight. The transition will take decades. In the meantime, demand for existing services remains strong—especially for natural gas, which is still a key bridge fuel.

The Bottom Line: Why EPD Is the Smart Long-Term Pick

I am convinced that Enterprise Products Partners is the best pipeline stock for most investors. It’s not the highest-yielding. It won’t make headlines. But it compounds reliably, operates with discipline, and owns irreplaceable infrastructure. You’re not buying growth here—you’re buying resilience. And in a world where “safe” assets yield next to nothing, that’s worth something.

ET has its place for aggressive yield seekers. SPHD works for passive investors. But if you want one pipeline stock that balances income, stability, and long-term viability? EPD stands alone. Because while others chase momentum, EPD keeps building, paying, and enduring—quietly, consistently, year after year.

That’s not exciting. But it might be the smartest thing you do all year.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Is 6 a good height? - The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.
  • Is 172 cm good for a man? - Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately.
  • How much height should a boy have to look attractive? - Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man.
  • Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old? - The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too.
  • Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old? - How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is 6 a good height?

The average height of a human male is 5'10". So 6 foot is only slightly more than average by 2 inches. So 6 foot is above average, not tall.

2. Is 172 cm good for a man?

Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.

3. How much height should a boy have to look attractive?

Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.

4. Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

5. Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

6. How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years)
14 Years112.0 lb. (50.8 kg)64.5" (163.8 cm)
15 Years123.5 lb. (56.02 kg)67.0" (170.1 cm)
16 Years134.0 lb. (60.78 kg)68.3" (173.4 cm)
17 Years142.0 lb. (64.41 kg)69.0" (175.2 cm)

7. How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

8. Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

9. Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

10. Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.